Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hormonal induction of spermatogenesis offers men with azoospermia due to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) the promising prospect of fertility restoration. However, an important exception is the subset of individuals affected by congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (CHH), also known as Kallmann syndrome if associated with anosmia, who often display dismal responses to fertility induction, despite prolonged therapy. This primarily stems from the loss of minipuberty, which is a crucial phase of testicular maturation in early life that has a far-reaching impact on eventual spermatogenic capacity. Further exacerbating the compromised reproductive health is the failure to initiate timely pubertal induction in many CHH patients, resulting in suboptimal genital and psychosexual development. In this paper, the clinical implications and management of male HH across the lifespan is comprehensively reviewed, with a special focus on novel strategies that have the potential to modify disease severity and maximize fertility potential in CHH by addressing the inadequacies of conventional approaches.

Keywords

hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism Kallmann syndrome minipuberty delayed puberty infertility spermatogenesis gonadotrophin therapy

Introduction

Hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) is defined as a clinical syndrome of gonadal failure due to deficient hypothalamic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. Whereas men with primary testicular dysfunction have irreversibly diminished spermatogenic capacity, gonadotrophin therapy provides men with HH the opportunity to restore endogenous testosterone production and spermatogenesis. Indeed, the prospect of fertility can be greatly enhanced by appropriate spermatogenesis induction treatment, backed by modern assisted reproduction technology in less robust responders, or those with less fertile partners. However, it has been long recognized that a significant proportion of men with congenital forms of HH do not respond favourably to conventional treatment approaches and, in this article, we explore possible reasons for this. Insights into the ontogenesis of the male reproductive tract and accumulating clinical evidence now support novel strategies in which interventions at various stages of life in individuals with more severe disease can potentially improve long-term sexual and reproductive outcomes.

Triphasic testicular maturation and hormonal control of spermatogenesis

In contrast with females who are born with their lifetime supply of oocytes, males require three distinct phases of testicular maturation to develop and sustain spermatogenesis. The first phase of testicular development commences in utero at week 7 of embryonic development, with the secretion of testosterone by foetal-type Leydig cells under the regulation of placental human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG).

This is followed by ‘minipuberty’, a transient activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular (HPT) axis during the third trimester of gestation that continues until 6 months postnatal.¹ A hallmark of this developmental phase is the robust gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) activity, accompanied by the rise of serum testosterone and gonadotrophin levels to near-adult male levels at 2–3 months of age.² During this period, inguinoscrotal testicular descent and anchoring in the scrotum, as well as penile growth, are driven by luteinizing hormone (LH)-induced testosterone and insulin-like 3.^3,4 Concurrently, active proliferation of Sertoli cells occurs under the stimulation of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), marked by exponential increase in serum inhibin B (I_B) and anti-Müllerian hormone.² As androgen receptors are not expressed on Sertoli cells until 5 years of age, germ cell maturation and spermatogenesis do not occur.⁵ Thereafter, the decline of reproductive hormones to low levels signifies the end of minipuberty, and the HPT axis retreats into quiescence for the rest of childhood.

The reactivation of pulsatile GnRH secretion in early adolescence heralds the onset of puberty, and is detectable clinically by testicular enlargement of ⩾4 ml. Another wave of FSH-stimulated Sertoli cells and spermatogonial proliferation sets in, with a resultant increase in the length and diameter of the seminiferous tubules. They eventually account for 90% of the entire testicular volume (TV), representing key determinants of spermatogenic potential.⁶

Subsequently, under the influence of Leydig cell-derived testosterone, Sertoli cells cease to proliferate further and undergo maturation to establish the microenvironment necessary to facilitate spermatogenesis. Sperm production is now possible under the concerted actions of FSH and intra-testicular testosterone.⁷ Importantly, the high local concentration of testosterone, which is 40-fold greater than the systemic levels,⁸ is a prerequisite for its paracrine effects on the stimulation of spermatogenesis.

Causes of hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

Differentiating HH into congenital and acquired aetiologies has important clinical implications. First, congenital causes are uncommon but tend to have a more significant impact on reproductive function because of the early disruption to gonadal development. Second, acquired causes may either be permanent or medically reversible, requiring very different management approaches, hence necessitating accurate elucidation of underlying pathology.

Congenital

Congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (CHH) is a rare genetic condition characterized by deficiency in secretion or action of GnRH, with otherwise normal pituitary function. From limited published literature, a prevalence of 1 in 4000–15,000 is currently estimated.^9,10 Although a marked male preponderance (~4:1)¹¹ in CHH has been consistently reported, it remains incompletely explained at the genetic level, as only a small fraction is identified to be of X-linked inheritance (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Key genetic mutations involved in the pathogenesis of CHH, with corresponding mode of inheritance.¹²

Broadly speaking, the genetic defects underlying CHH can be classified into two main groups: abnormal GnRH and olfactory neuronal migration (anosmia/hyposmia, that is Kallmann syndrome), and impaired GnRH secretion or action (normosmic CHH). This simple dichotomy provides a convenient way to categorize patients clinically based on their sense of smell, but belies the diversity of the genetic mutations involved; over 30 gene loci have been implicated to date and half of the CHH cases remained unaccounted for.¹² This complexity is also reflected in the various modes of transmission possible, including all forms of classical Mendelian inheritance and oligogenicity.^12,13 (Figure 1). Additionally, CHH is phenotypically heterogeneous, with variable association with other nonreproductive abnormalities such as cleft lip and palate, dental agenesis, ear defects, deafness, renal agenesis, bimanual synkinesis (mirror hand movements) and skeletal anomalies.¹³

Multiple pituitary hormonal deficiencies can occur as a result of defective development and organogenesis of pituitary gland, a condition known as combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). With a prevalence of 1 in 8000, it is defined by the impaired production of growth hormone, resulting in growth retardation and failure to thrive in children, along with a deficiency of one or more other anterior pituitary hormones, most commonly LH and FSH.^14,15 Pituitary hormone deficiencies may develop over a variable period of time during life and are not necessarily all present neonatally. Interestingly, overlapping genetic overlap has been observed between CHH and CPHD with HH, but most individuals are presently of an unknown genotype.^14,16 Unlike CHH, the pituitary gland is usually of abnormal appearance in CPHD and isolated growth hormone (GH) deficiency.

Acquired

Organic causes of HH typically result in permanent hypogonadism and are commonly associated with other anterior pituitary hormonal deficiencies. They include destructive and infiltrative disorders of the hypothalamus or pituitary gland, such as pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas, sarcoidosis, haemochromatosis, lymphocytic hypophysitis and histiocytosis, as well as iatrogenic causes including pituitary surgery and radiation therapy. Of note, haemochromatosis preferentially affects gonadotrophs due to the expression of an iron transporter in their cell membranes, and thus tends to manifest as isolated HH (± diabetes, arthralgia, cirrhosis, or cardiomyopathy).¹⁷

In contrast, functional causes of HH, leading to suppression of gonadotrophin and testosterone production, are potentially reversible by disease remission or medical treatment, or discontinuation of the offending medication. One of the most frequent causes of acquired isolated HH is hyperprolactinaemia, which can result from the use of medications that interfere with the dopaminergic system (especially antipsychotic agents), prolactinomas, and less frequently pituitary stalk damage. Other drugs that can reversibly suppress the HPT axis include opiates, glucocorticoids and androgens or anabolic steroids (AASs).

In addition, nutritional disorders (low levels of leptin¹⁸) or any undiagnosed chronic illness¹⁹ may also negatively affect hypothalamic GnRH secretion, as is the case in women with hypothalamic amenorrhoea. Obesity-induced HH is being increasingly described in men (but not women), and is postulated to reside in adipose tissue-derived factors, including proinflammatory cytokines and altered insulin signalling, exerting central inhibitory effects on the HPT axis.^20,21 However, it is unclear whether these men are genuinely hypogonadal, or just have a form of non-gonadal illness. Moreover, obese men having insulin resistance and low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), may still have physiological levels of free testosterone even when levels of total testosterone are low.²²

Clinical manifestations and diagnostic evaluation

Infants

Because of the lack of minipuberty, a high proportion of male infants with congenital GnRH or gonadotrophin deficiencies are affected by cryptorchidism or micropenis. In the largest United Kingdom (UK) series of men with CHH, around 50% were cryptorchid at birth, of which one-third had bilateral disease,²³ compared with the UK birth prevalence of 5–6%,^24,25 whereas micropenis affects 4.6–25.4%^26–28 of CHH males compared with the general population birth prevalence of 0.015–0.35%.^29,30 Experienced parents may also observe the absence of erections on nappy change. In addition, children may manifest nonreproductive CHH-associated phenotypes at birth, including cleft lip or palate, syndactyly or other anomaly of digits, and hearing impairment detected on automated otoacoustic emissions test.³¹ However, anosmia usually cannot be reliably detected until after age 6–8 years.

In contrast with the diagnostic challenges of CHH in early adolescence (discussed later), the phase of male minipuberty provides an extraordinary window of opportunity in which the diagnosis can be established in infancy. By biochemical profiling of reproductive hormones during this period, ideally during the physiological peak of HPT axis activity expected around 1–3 months of age, the findings of abnormally low testosterone, FSH and LH levels would be confirmatory for CHH. Such a strategy was proven to be useful in identifying concomitant HH in a cohort of male infants with congenital hypopituitarism.³² Moreover, there is also a possibility of thereby inducing testicular descent without surgery, although evidence is sparse. Therefore, proactive screening for absent minipuberty in infants with ‘red flag’ features (Table 1), particularly bilateral cryptorchidism or micropenis, is advocated.³¹

Table 1.

Suggested approach to the management of CHH in males.

Age group	Clinical presentations	Investigations	Goals and treatment plan	Monitoring	Comments
Neonatal-infancy	Cryptorchidism or micropenis; ± other red flags*	1–3 months postnatal: serum T, FSH, LH ± AMH, I_B.	Re-position testes in scrotum by age 12 months: – Consider pre-orchidopexy combined gonadotrophin therapy for 3–6 months to induce testicular (and penile) growth. For micropenis, a short course of T therapy to induce penile growth: – For example, IM T cypionate/ enanthate 25 mg 3 weekly for 3 months	Serum T, FSH, LH ± AMH and I_B; Ultrasound testes	Establishing loss of minipuberty is key to early diagnosis. Spontaneous testicular descent may occur following gonadotrophin treatment. Long-term follow up of these children is recommended.
Adolescence	Delayed or arrested puberty; ± red flags	Morning T, FSH, LH and rest of anterior pituitary hormones; exclude systemic illnesses.	Age-appropriate pubertal induction to avoid psychosocial complications, and to optimize statural growth: – For example, IM T cypionate/ enanthate starting at 50 mg 4-weekly, with gradual up-titration over 2–3 years to full adult replacement levels	Serial testicular volume examination; T, FSH, LH, FBC	In isolated gonadotrophin deficiency, MRI pituitary is usually not required in the first instance. Serial assessment for spontaneous testicular growth helps differentiate between CDGP and CHH. Avoid premature hCG monotherapy.
Adulthood	Infertility; sexual dysfunction; under-virilization; ± red flags	Morning T, FSH, LH and rest of anterior pituitary hormones; exclude systemic illnesses; Semen analysis; BMD scan; consider MRI pituitary.	Sperm-induction with combined gonadotrophin (FSH + hCG) therapy: – FSH-priming (2–4 months) prior to adding hCG therapy is recommended, especially if testicular volume <4 ml	Serial testicular volume examination; T, E2, FSH ± I_B; Semen analysis	Early planning is crucial as spermatogenesis may take up to 2 years to achieve. Offer sperm cryopreservation prior to stopping gonadotrophin therapy.
			Long-term T replacement therapy: transdermal or injectable T formulations	T, SHBG, FBC, PSA (⩾55 years, or 40 if high risk).	Annual monitoring when steady state is reached.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; BMD, bone mineral density; CDGP, constitutional delay in growth and puberty; CHH, congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism; E2, oestradiol; FBC, full blood count; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotrophin; I_B, inhibin B; IM, intramuscular; LH, luteinizing hormone; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; T, testosterone.

Red flags:³¹ cryptorchidism, micropenis, absent erections on nappy change, anosmia/hyposmia, clefting, digit anomaly, deafness, family history.

Adolescents

Failure to develop secondary sexual characteristics due to pubertal delay is the main mode of presentation in adolescents with HH. In boys, the first sign of puberty is testicular enlargement, which normally occurs between 9 and 14 years old, corresponding to 2–2.5 standard deviations of the population mean.³³ Accordingly, delayed puberty is defined as the absence of testicular enlargement (<4 ml) by age 14 years.

During adolescence, the single most common cause of delayed puberty is constitutional delay in growth and puberty (CDGP), which accounts for 65–82% of affected boys.^34,35 Although CDGP represents a late variant in the normal spectrum of pubertal timing, it can only be diagnosed after the exclusion of pathological causes. Therefore, careful clinical assessment in conjunction with biochemical evaluation, such as full blood count, renal and liver profile, inflammatory markers, thyroid function and iron studies, is imperative to rule out an underlying chronic disorder.³⁶ In addition, pituitary function should be screened by measuring basal hormonal levels. Further investigations, such as dynamic endocrine function tests (rarely necessary) and cranial imaging, should be guided by baseline clinical and laboratory findings.

Notably, CDGP and CHH are difficult to distinguish in teenage years as isolated HH is common to both conditions, although linear growth deceleration is rarely a feature of CHH. A variety of physiological and stimulation tests have been proposed over the years, with some promising results emerging from recent studies on serum inhibin B, but there is yet a ‘gold standard’ test that can reliably differentiate them apart.³⁷ Genetics may have a role in future as CDGP and CHH do not seem to share a common genetic architecture.³⁸

Meanwhile, clinicians often fall back on the classic dogma of expectant management, that is, allowing adolescents with CDGP to undergo spontaneous initiation of puberty, as a means to identify those with CHH who do not.³⁹ As a consequence, the diagnosis of CHH is typically made in late adolescence or early adulthood,⁴⁰ leading to median 5 year delay in the initiation of pubertal induction. Moreover, around one-third of CHH patients have arrested partial puberty at presentation (testes ⩾ 4 ml, or breast stage 2–3) and may thus be wrongly reassured that ‘as puberty has begun, it will necessarily proceed to completion’.

Hence the crucial importance of identifying the presence of ‘red flags’ in a young man with pubertal delay, in particular cryptorchidism, micropenis, deafness, clefting or anosmia, would be strongly indicative of CHH.⁴¹

Adults

Infertility and sexual dysfunction, including poor libido, erectile dysfunction and loss of spontaneous erections, are important manifestations of hypogonadism in adulthood. Nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, reduced energy, low mood, inability to focus and sleep disorder can also be reported by hypogonadal men. Uncommonly, CHH may be uncovered in under-virialized adult men.⁴² Such delayed presentation beyond teenage years could be due to reluctance to engage with healthcare systems, or failure to be supported with appropriate pubertal induction by physicians they encountered earlier in life, but is underpinned by minimal exposure to reproductive endocrinology in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical training.

To confirm the diagnosis of hypogonadism unequivocally and consistently, low serum testosterone must be demonstrated.⁴³ As circulating testosterone levels are significantly influenced by diurnal rhythm, food intake and changes in health status, venipuncture should be carefully scheduled to avoid false positive results. This is especially crucial in those with less specific clinical features of androgen deficiency to avoid misdiagnosis. Hence, it is recommended that blood specimens be obtained on two separate mornings (8–10 am) after an overnight fast, and testing should be deferred in the event of acute illness, altered sleep–wake cycle (e.g. shift work), or short-term use of medications (e.g. glucocorticoids, opioids) that can suppress testosterone concentrations. In addition, measurement of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) to determine free testosterone concentrations by validated formula is helpful in men with conditions that can alter SHBG concentrations, such obesity and diabetes mellitus, or when initial total testosterone concentrations are equivocal. In the subsequent workup of HH, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sella turcica should be considered in men with broader pituitary hormone deficiencies, persistent or marked hyperprolactinaemia, profoundly low serum total testosterone (<5.2 nmol/l),⁴⁴ or symptoms of tumour mass effect (e.g. visual field defect, new-onset headache). If fertility is a concern, a minimum of two semen analyses should be performed in accordance to international standards established by the World Health Organization (WHO),⁴⁵ unless of course baseline TV is so low (<5 ml) as to make spermatogenesis extremely unlikely.

Treatment strategies

Infants

Neonates affected by cryptorchidism or micropenis must receive timely treatment to optimize genital development. Importantly, cryptorchidism has a far-reaching negative impact on future fertility potential, and delay in orchidopexy has been associated with further compromise in spermatogonia.⁴⁶ Therefore, current recommendations advocate surgical correction of undescended testis by about 1 year of age.⁴⁷ As for micropenis, the treatment usually entails a short course of low-dose testosterone delivered either by intramuscular injection or topical application to induce penile growth. A commonly described regimen is the intramuscular administration of four doses of 25 mg of testosterone cypionate or enanthate once every 3 weeks for 3 months.⁴⁸ Because the treatment is restricted to a brief duration, no significant concern exists with regards to virilization.

However, there are limitations to these treatments. Small testes render orchidopexy technically challenging with excess risk of testicular trauma and tissue loss,⁴⁹ which would further exacerbate the pre-existing testicular dysfunction. In addition, while exogenous testosterone effectively stimulates penile growth, it has absolutely no effect on testicular development. Recognizing the critical role of minipuberty, the feasibility and benefits of gonadotrophin treatment in recreating the hormonal milieu in affected male infants have been studied.

In the first published report of a boy with CHH and micropenis who received short-term recombinant human LH and FSH from age 7.9 to 13.7 months, the penile length successfully increased by 50% and the TV nearly tripled by the end of treatment.⁵⁰ In another report of two male infants (one case each of CPHD and CHH), 6 months of gonadotrophin combination therapy via subcutaneous pump infusion initiated at age 8 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively, led to a four-fold increase in both penile length and TV.⁵¹ More recently, 3–6 months of continuous subcutaneous infusion of recombinant human gonadotrophins in five male infants (four CHH and one CPHD) produced a several-fold increase in serum I_B concentrations, TV, and testosterone production.⁵²

More intriguingly, there is emerging evidence that spontaneous testicular descent could be successfully induced by gonadotrophin treatment, and thus obviate the need for surgery. In a study of eight infants with maldescended testes due to underlying HH (five CHH and three CPHD), gonadotrophin infusion induced complete testicular descent in six boys and partial descent in two boys, such that only one had to undergo orchidopexy eventually because of re-ascent of both testes 11 months later.⁵³ In another study, combined recombinant FSH and LH in the first 6 months of life successfully induced spontaneous testicular descent in two of four CHH/CPHD boys with bilateral cryptorchidism.⁵² However, the evidence base is diluted by studies wherein gonadotropin treatment was used on ‘all-comers’ with cryptorchidism, rather than in boys with proven or suspected CHH.

Even if gonadotrophin treatment turns out to be unsuccessful in inducing spontaneous testicular descent, it would still be hugely beneficial in facilitating orchidopexy in gonadotropin-deficient boys by enlarging the TV presurgically.

Therefore, short-term neonatal gonadotrophin treatment appears to be promising in replicating the effects of minipuberty, by correcting micropenis, promoting testicular growth, and inducing descent of malpositioned testes, with the prospect of augmenting future sexual and reproductive function.⁴⁹

Adolescents

Pubertal delay is associated with considerable psychosocial impairment, including low self-esteem, social withdrawal, poor school performance and even higher rates of substance use disorder.^33,54,55 This is especially problematic for CHH patients, as most only start to receive meaningful treatment in late adolescence at a mean age of 18–19 years.⁵⁶ The emotionally distressing experience of being stuck in a prepubertal, under-masculinized state while their peers progress through puberty can be psychologically scarring.¹⁴ Furthermore, the embarrassment of immature external genitalia can produce adverse lasting impact on their sexuality and ability to form intimate relationship, especially for those with history of cryptorchidism or microphallus.^56,57 Consequently, a high prevalence of men with CHH suffer from chronic depressive symptoms as adults, often requiring the use of antidepressants.^56,57

Therefore, the tendency to indiscriminately feed teenagers with pubertal delay and ‘red flags’ for CHH into ‘delayed puberty of unknown cause’ management pathways³⁹ is inappropriate and potentially damaging. Indeed, a 12–13 year-old with absent puberty and ‘red flag’ CHH features, for example, anosmia, or history of cryptorchidism, should obviously be diagnosed as ‘CHH until-proven otherwise’ and receive immediate sex hormone therapy to initiate puberty.

If there are no suspicious features of permanent hypogonadism, and a presumptive diagnosis of CDGP is made following initial evaluation, treatment with the aim of accelerating growth or inducing secondary sexual characteristics should be discussed, especially for those who are facing psychosocial difficulties. Treatment is commonly initiated at intramuscular injection of 50 mg testosterone ester each month for 3–6 months with close follow up,⁴¹ although this dosimetry should not be extrapolated for use in older apubertal men.⁴² However, if there is persistent absence of endogenous gonadotrophin-dependent puberty (lack of testicular enlargement) on serial follow up, MRI brain with coronal T2 sequences through the olfactory bulbs would be indicated. In addition to excluding hypothalamo-pituitary pathologies, the radiological finding of absent or hypoplastic olfactory bulbs is pathognomonic for Kallmann syndrome.

For adolescents with CHH (or other cause of permanent HH), the testosterone dose is gradually increased over a course of 3 years until full adult replacement levels. Such a pubertal induction strategy seeks to replicate the typical tempo of puberty so that the appearance of secondary sexual characteristics would be age appropriate and in tandem with the degree of psychosexual development.⁴¹ This is also necessary to ensure the optimization of statural growth by promoting a growth spurt and preventing premature fusion of epiphyseal plates. However, for older men in whom there are no concerns about final height, a faster tempo of pubertal induction is appropriate.⁴²

However, exogenous testosterone therapy does not induce testicular growth nor promote spermatogenesis. In clinical practice, teenage and young adult patients are often troubled by negative body image and poor self-esteem due to the appearance of small testes, despite having achieved full virilization in all other aspects. Notably, in a recent study on young men with HH, gonadotrophin treatment was found to have a greater positive impact on the health-related quality of life compared with testosterone replacement, particularly if spermatogenesis is successfully demonstrated on semen analysis,⁵⁸ which conceivably relates to an enhanced sense of masculinity. Moreover, early induction of spermatogenesis has the advantage of reducing the time required for appearance of sperm and the need for prolonged cycles of gonadotrophin treatment in adult life. As such, gonadotrophin treatment plays an essential role in the management of patients with prepubertal-onset HH and should be carefully planned for in order to optimize testicular maturation and fertility potential.

One important aspect to consider is the sequence of gonadotrophins initiation. In normal pubertal development, Sertoli cells and seminiferous tubules initially expand under the stimulation of FSH, and as intra-testicular testosterone increases with the progression of puberty, they stop proliferating and undergo terminal differentiation. Indeed, FSH monotherapy in children and adolescents with prepubertal-onset HH has been proven to be effective in promoting testicular growth and increase in circulating I_B concentrations.^59,60 Importantly, in a small subgroup of adolescents with CHH, FSH-priming prior to combination with hCG successfully induced spermatogenesis in three out of four patients.⁶⁰ This sequential gonadotrophin therapy, FSH monotherapy followed by combined FSH and hCG, is emerging to be a promising fertility-induction strategy. Crucially, as hCG monotherapy would cause premature differentiation of the diminished pool of Sertoli and germ cells, thereby abolishing any chance of proliferation, it should be avoided in those with immature testes.

As patients approach late adolescence/adulthood, close collaboration between paediatric and adult endocrinologists is necessary to ensure smooth transition of care, which is unfortunately an often neglected aspect in the care of young patients with chronic diseases.⁵⁷

Adults

Fertility can be restored in men with HH by sperm-induction protocols that replicate endocrine regulation of spermatogenesis using pulsatile GnRH therapy or exogenous gonadotrophins. However, while treatment successfully stimulates sperm production in majority of patients, largely comprises of adult (postpubertal)-onset HH, a significant proportion of men with congenital forms of HH have very poor response. These men have lifelong profound deficiencies in LH and FSH secretion which have severely compromised their spermatogenic potential. It is important to identify these individuals so that targeted treatment approach can be undertaken to improve outcomes.

Conventional sperm-induction regimens

Although pulsatile GnRH treatment is biologically and technically feasible to induce fertility in men with CHH (GnRH deficiency), it is rarely used outside of research settings because of limited availability of drug, infusion devices and expertise to deliver such a therapy. Moreover, it is ineffective in men with HH due to pituitary disease, hence further restricting its applicability. Therefore, exogenous gonadotrophins, which have importantly demonstrated comparable efficacy to that of pulsatile GnRH treatment,^61,62 are favoured in clinical practices.

(i) hCG monotherapy ± adjuvant FSH (hCG ± FSH)

This regimen is only suitable for men at the mildest end of the disease spectrum, for example, men with adult-onset HH who have undergone normal pubertal and gonadal development, especially if they have fathered children before. In these men, treatment with only hCG is usually sufficient to achieve optimal sperm counts by about 6 months. Thereafter, if the sperm count remains unsatisfactory despite good adherence and appropriate dosing, FSH can be added to the regimen. However, a trial of hCG monotherapy is futile in men with prepubertal testes (TV <4 ml) or a history of cryptorchidism, as the failure rate is exceedingly high, even with prolonged therapy up to 10 years.^63–65

As a long-acting LH-analogue, hCG is typically initiated at 3000–5000 IU per week divided into 2–3 subcutaneous injections. Common side effects to monitor for include erythrocytosis and gynaecomastia. Hence, to ensure well-tolerated and optimal dosing, clinicians should monitor trough levels of serum testosterone, haematocrit and oestradiol every 4–6 weeks to guide dose titration until a steady state has been achieved. Of note, as testes enlarge during the course of treatment, normal serum testosterone may sometimes be attainable at lower doses. Similar dosing principles would apply for newer recombinant hCG (choriogonadotrophin alfa), which comes in the form of injection prefilled pen. In resource-limited settings, careful storage of the remaining hCG in the refrigerator in between injections is considered safe.

(ii) Combined gonadotrophin treatment (hCG + FSH)

Depending on the severity of FSH and LH deficiencies, men with CHH (or CPHD) could have different prognosis for fertility outcomes. Those with partial gonadotrophin deficiencies generally have milder phenotype. They may enter puberty spontaneously, accompanied by a degree of testicular maturation, only to experience failure to progress later.⁶⁶ On the other hand, two-thirds of men with CHH have profound GnRH deficiency, characterized by prepubertal TV (<4 ml), low serum I_B concentration (<60 pg/ml) or a history of cryptorchidism, which likewise are negative predictors of treatment response.^27,67

For CHH patients with evidence of prior gonadal development (TV ⩾4 ml) and no history of cryptorchidism, combined gonadotrophin therapy (hCG + FSH) at inception is recommended to optimize testicular growth and spermatogenesis. However, in a subset of patients with near-adult size testes, hCG monotherapy could achieve success, with the addition of FSH after 6 months if response is suboptimal. Commonly available FSH preparations, highly purified urinary gonadotrophins (hMGs) and recombinant FSH, are self-administered by subcutaneous injections. The starting dose of FSH is 75 IU 3 times per week, with dose adjusted (up to 300 IU 3 times per week) as necessary, to achieve serum FSH concentration in the physiologic range of 4–8 IU/l.⁶⁸ If a new long-acting FSH analogue is chosen, injection is given every 10–14 days.^68,69

As already stated, hCG monotherapy has no place in the management of men with prepubertal testes (TV < 4 ml) or a history of cryptorchidism, as the failure rate is exceedingly high, even with prolonged therapy^63–65 and non-responders to hCG/FSH combination therapy after 3–6 months of hCG pretreatment (a protocol originally devised for FSH product licensing studies in men and not grounded in developmental physiology) are over-represented by patients with similar characteristics.⁷⁰ Therefore, spermatogenesis induction with combined gonadotrophin treatment from the outset is considered the standard of care for this group of patients. However, it is disappointing that up to one-third of men remains azoospermic on combined gonadotrophin therapy (or the equivalent pulsatile GnRH therapy).⁶² Of the responders, a significantly longer period of treatment compared with men with larger baseline TV would be required before sperms are observed in ejaculate.²⁷ In addition, sperm counts typically plateau well below that of WHO reference value (⩾15 million/ml),^45,27 although that does not necessarily preclude the possibility of natural conception.^67,71,72

Sequential gonadotrophin treatment (FSH FSH + hCG)

Men with complete CHH have markedly diminished spermatogenic capacity due to the absence of FSH-stimulated Sertoli and germ cell proliferation, which would explain the dismal response to conventional gonadotrophin treatment. As such, it would be desirable to maximize the growth of Sertoli cells and seminiferous tubules first by administering FSH therapy only (FSH-priming), before the subsequent introduction of hCG therapy, so as to prevent premature differentiation of Sertoli cells under the influence of LH-induced intra-testicular testosterone.

The potential advantage of such unopposed FSH treatment in adult was demonstrated in a randomized, open-label trial of 13 treatment-naïve adult CHH men with prepubertal testes (TV < 4 ml).⁷³ In this study, seven men were randomized to recombinant FSH pretreatment for 4 months before embarking on a 24-month GnRH treatment protocol. During the FSH-only phase, TV doubled and serum I_B levels rose to adult levels, and all patients in this arm subsequently developed sperm in ejaculate on GnRH therapy, compared with four of six men in the 24-month GnRH-only arm. Encouragingly, trends towards larger TV, higher maximal sperm counts and shorter time to first appearance of sperm in the ejaculate in the FSH-pretreated group were also observed.

Although larger multicentre studies are needed to confirm these findings, FSH-priming appears to be a logical and promising approach to improving fertility in men with a severe form of CHH, by providing a critical window for maximal expansion of immature Sertoli and germ cell mass. As serum I_B was observed to plateau following 2 months of unopposed FSH treatment in the aforementioned study,⁷³ it can be safely inferred that treatment between 2–4 months would suffice, before introducing hCG to induce maturation and initiate the process of spermatogenesis. Once TV reaches around 8 ml, seminal fluid analysis can be performed every 2–3 months to monitor for sperm production.

Genetic counselling and screening of offspring

Genetic counselling is essential for patients with CHH who are seeking fertility because of the risk of passing on the disease to their offspring.¹² However, unless classical Mendelian inheritance mode of transmission (autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant or X-linked transmission) is certain, counselling is often difficult due to the complex genetic architecture (oligogenicity) in many cases. An estimated 5–10% transmission risk can be advised in such scenarios.⁷⁴ It is also good practice to have patients engaged with their providers/genetic specialists in ongoing discussion, as the genetic landscape is constantly evolving in the current era of next-generation sequencing. Furthermore, as screening of offspring for minipuberty is extremely helpful in facilitating early diagnosis, it should be offered to prospective parents during the counselling process.

Artificial reproductive technology and sperm cryopreservation

Spermatogenesis induction may take between 6 and 24 months to achieve maximal effect,^62,72,75 and natural conception may not occur until 2–3 years of gonadotrophin therapy,⁷² with significantly lower chance of success in men with poor prognostic factors. Therefore, given the potential length of treatment process, it would be necessary to factor in the urgency to conceive, particularly in relation to the age and health of the partner. Early involvement of a fertility specialist is thus important to facilitate concurrent evaluation for any female subfertility issue, as well as timely access to artificial reproductive technologies (ARTs) if needed, including in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and microdissection with testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). Compared with other surgical sperm retrieval techniques, micro-TESE has proven superiority in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (e.g. Klinefelter syndrome) because of the direct magnified visualization afforded during the harvesting process, which would similarly be advantageous to men with HH should gonadotrophin treatment fail to achieve sperm in ejaculate.⁷⁶

If conception is successful, gonadotrophin treatment into the second trimester of pregnancy is recommended in order to maintain spermatogenic capability in the unfortunate event of miscarriage. Treatment with hCG alone may also be continued if the couple desires another child in the near future.⁷⁷ Otherwise, if decision is made to switch to testosterone replacement, sperm cryopreservation (banking) prior to stopping gonadotrophin therapy should be considered, as future fertility with repeat gonadotrophin treatment, though associated with quicker initiation of spermatogenesis,^67,72 is not assured.

Further considerations

Long-term management of classical hypogonadism

Approximately 10–20% of men with CHH experience reversal of hypogonadism, albeit with risk of relapse.⁷⁸ Otherwise, the vast majority of men with organic HH would require lifelong physiological testosterone replacement to avoid androgen deficiency-related end-organ deficits, including anaemia, osteoporosis and muscle wasting. Among the formulations available, long-acting testosterone undecanoate depot injection and transdermal applications are preferred because of their favourable pharmacokinetics in providing stable circulating testosterone concentrations. Once appropriate dosing has been established, annual monitoring of testosterone, haematocrit/haemoglobin for testosterone-induced erythrocytosis, as well as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men aged ⩾55 years (40 years if high risk) is recommended.⁴³ In addition, baseline bone mineral density (BMD) measurements is useful to identify patients with low bone mass; testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men has been shown to be effective in improving BMD,⁷⁹ and thus antiresorptive agents should be deferred until later life, unless the patient has already sustained a fragility fracture.

Alternative treatment for functional HH: aromatase inhibitors and selective oestrogen receptor modulators

In recent years, there is increasing interest in the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) as alternative modalities in the treatment of male hypogonadism and subfertility.⁸⁰ It is crucial to recognize that, in order for these agents to work, hypothalamic–pituitary function must be intact because these act by decreasing oestradiol-mediated negative feedback inhibition. Therefore, AIs/SERMs are only potentially viable in patients with functional, but not organic, causes of HH. Some common scenarios include severe obesity, chronic opiate use, and withdrawal from AASs. But in the absence of robust data on the safety and efficacy of these agents, measures to address the underlying cause and avoidance of testosterone treatment are preferred instead. However, if aetiological factors cannot be resolved satisfactorily, or recovery of spermatogenesis does not occur within a reasonable timeframe, an off-label trial of AIs/SERMs for a limited course (e.g. clomiphene 25 mg, three times per week to 50 mg daily, anastrozole 1 mg, three times per week)⁸⁰ might be considered for selected patients before embarking on definitive fertility-induction treatment with gonadotrophins.

Conclusion

While infertility due to male HH is generally considered to be amenable to hormonal therapy, the clinical response depends principally on the onset and severity of the neuroendocrine defect. Men with congenital forms of HH typically have much less favourable prognosis because of severely compromised testicular development beginning in foetal life. Strategies to identify these patients early in childhood, as well as instituting timely pubertal induction in adolescence, can significantly improve long-term sexual and reproductive function. Furthermore, a fertility-induction protocol that seeks to maximize Sertoli and germ cell proliferation (FSH-priming) holds promise in enhancing spermatogenesis for these individuals. Couples would also benefit from multidisciplinary care and access to ARTs when necessary. Long-term physiological testosterone replacement is necessary for men with organic/permanent HH, whereas condition-specific treatment for those with functional HH can effectively restore endogenous HPT axis function.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Both authors contributed equally to the writing, editing and approval of this commissioned manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ORCID iD

Du Soon Swee

References

Forest

Cathiard

Bertrand

JA.

Evidence of testicular activity in early infancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1973; 37: 148–151.

Johannsen

Main

Ljubicic

et al . Sex-differences in reproductive hormones during mini-puberty in infants with normal and disordered sex development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018–00482.

Bay

Main

Toppari

et al . Testicular descent: INSL3, testosterone, genes and the intrauterine milieu. Nat Rev Urol 2011; 8: 187–196.

Koskenniemi

Virtanen

Wohlfahrt-Veje

et al . Postnatal changes in testicular position are associated with IGF-I and function of sertoli and leydig cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103: 1429–1437.

Rey

Musse

Venara

et al . Ontogeny of the androgen receptor expression in the fetal and postnatal testis: its relevance on sertoli cell maturation and the onset of adult spermatogenesis. Microsc Res Tech 2009; 72: 787–795.

Russell

Ren

Hikim

et al . A comparative study in twelve mammalian species of volume densities, volumes, and numerical densities of selected testis components, emphasizing those related to the sertoli cell. Am J Anat 1990; 188: 21–30.

Andersson

Müller

Skakkebæk

NE.

Different roles of prepubertal and postpubertal germ cells and sertoli cells in the regulation of serum inhibin B levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 4451–4458.

Coviello

Bremner

Matsumoto

et al . Intratesticular testosterone concentrations comparable with serum levels are not sufficient to maintain normal sperm production in men receiving a hormonal contraceptive regimen. J Androl. 2004; 25: 931–938.

Fromantin

Gineste

Didier

et al . Impuberism and hypogonadism at induction into military service. Statistical study. Probl Actuels Endocrinol Nutr 1973; 16: 179–199.

10.

Laitinen

Vaaralahti

Tommiska

et al . Incidence, phenotypic features and molecular genetics of kallmann syndrome in Finland. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011; 6: 41.

11.

Dzemaili

Tiemensma

Quinton

et al . Beyond hormone replacement: quality of life in women with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Endocr Connect 2017; 6: 404–412.

12.

Maione

Dwyer

Francou

et al . Genetic counseling for congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and Kallmann syndrome: new challenges in the era of oligogenism and next-generation sequencing. Eur J Endocrinol 2018; 178: R55–R80.

13.

Mitchell

Dwyer

Pitteloud

et al . Genetic basis and variable phenotypic expression of Kallmann syndrome: towards a unifying theory. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2011; 22: 249–258.

14.

Fang

George

Brinkmeier

et al . Genetics of combined pituitary hormone deficiency: roadmap into the genome era. Endocr Rev 2016; 37: 636–675.

15.

Otto

França

Correa

et al . Frequent development of combined pituitary hormone deficiency in patients initially diagnosed as isolated growth hormone deficiency: a long-term follow up of patients from a single center. Pituitary 2015; 18: 561–567.

16.

Castinetti

Reynaud

Saveanu

et al . An update in the genetic aetiologies of combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 174: R239–R247.

17.

Pelusi

Gasparini

Bianchi

et al . Endocrine dysfunction in hereditary hemochromatosis. J Endocrinol Invest 2016; 39: 837–847.

18.

Chan

Heist

DePaoli

et al . The role of falling leptin levels in the neuroendocrine and metabolic adaptation to short-term starvation in healthy men. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1409–1421.

19.

Turner

Wass

JAH

. Gonadal function in men with chronic illness. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997; 47: 379–403.

20.

Gautier

Bonnet

Dubois

et al . Associations between visceral adipose tissue, inflammation and sex steroid concentrations in men. Clin Endocrinol 2013; 78: 373–378.

21.

Bruning

Gautam

Burks

et al . Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 2000; 289: 2122–2125.

22.

Dwyer

Quinton

The metabolic syndrome in central hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Front Horm Res 2018; 49: 156–169.

23.

Quinton

Duke

Robertson

et al . Idiopathic gonadotrophin deficiency: Genetic questions addressed through phenotypic characterization. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001; 55: 163–174.

24.

Acerini

Miles

Dunger

et al . The descriptive epidemiology of congenital and acquired cryptorchidism in a UK infant cohort. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94: 868–872.

25.

John Radcliffe Hospital Cryptorchidism Study Group. Cryptorchidism: a prospective study of 7500 consecutive male births, 1984–8. John Radcliffe Hospital Cryptorchidism Study Group. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 892–899.

26.

Bonomi

Vezzoli

Krausz

et al . Characteristics of a nationwide cohort of patients presenting with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). Eur J Endocrinol 2018; 178: 23–32.

27.

Pitteloud

Hayes

Dwyer

et al . Predictors of outcome of long-term GnRH therapy in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 4128–4136.

28.

Stamou

Varnavas

Kentrou

et al . Isolated GNRH deficiency: Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of the genetically heterogeneous Greek population. Eur J Endocrinol 2017; 176: L1–L5.

29.

Nelson

Park

Wan

et al . The increasing incidence of congenital penile anomalies in the United States. J Urol 2005; 174(4 Pt 2): 1573–1576.

30.

Gaspari

Paris

Jandel

et al . Prenatal environmental risk factors for genital malformations in a population of 1442 French male newborns: a nested case control study. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 3155–3162.

31.

Quinton

Mamoojee

Jayasena

et al . Society for Endocrinology UK guidance on the evaluation of suspected disorders of sexual development: emphasizing the opportunity to predict adolescent pubertal failure through a neonatal diagnosis of absent minipuberty. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017; 86: 305–306.

32.

Braslavsky

Grinspon

Ballerini

et al . Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in infants with congenital hypopituitarism: a challenge to diagnose at an early stage. Horm Res Paediatr 2015; 84: 289–297.

33.

Palmert

Dunkel

Delayed puberty. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 443–453.

34.

Sedlmeyer

Palmert

MR.

Delayed puberty: analysis of a large case series from an academic center. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 1613–1620.

35.

Varimo

Miettinen

Känsäkoski

et al . Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, functional hypogonadotropism or constitutional delay of growth and puberty? An analysis of a large patient series from a single tertiary center. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 147–153.

36.

Boehm

Bouloux

Dattani

et al . Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism-pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015; 11: 547–564.

37.

Harrington

Palmert

MR.

Distinguishing constitutional delay of growth and puberty from isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: critical appraisal of available diagnostic tests. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 3056–3067.

38.

Cassatella

Howard

Acierno

et al . Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and constitutional delay of growth and puberty have distinct genetic architectures. Eur J Endocrinol. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-17–0568.

39.

Christie

Viner

Adolescent development. BMJ 2005; 330: 301.

40.

Dwyer

Tiemensma

Quinton

et al . Adherence to treatment in men with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017; 86: 377–383.

41.

Dunkel

Quinton

Transition in endocrinology: induction of puberty. Eur J Endocrinol. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-13–0894.

42.

Pazderska

Mamoojee

Artham

et al . Safety and tolerability of one-year intramuscular testosterone regime to induce puberty in older men with CHH. Endocr Connect 2018; 7: 133–138.

43.

Bhasin

Brito

Cunningham

et al . Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103: 1715–1744.

44.

Dalvi

Walker

Strachan

MWJ

et al . The prevalence of structural pituitary abnormalities by MRI scanning in men presenting with isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2016; 84: 858–861.

45.

Cooper

Noonan

von Eckardstein

et al . World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 231–245.

46.

Kollin

Stukenborg

Nurmio

et al . Boys with undescended testes: endocrine, volumetric and morphometric studies on testicular function before and after orchidopexy at nine months or three years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 4588–4595.

47.

Kolon

Herndon

CDA

Baker

et al . Evaluation and treatment of Cryptorchidism: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014; 192: 337–345.

48.

Hatipoğlu

Kurtoğlu

Micropenis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2013; 5: 217–223.

49.

Bouvattier

Maione

Bouligand

et al . Neonatal gonadotropin therapy in male congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012; 8: 172–182.

50.

Main

Schmidt

Toppari

et al . Early postnatal treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with recombinant human FSH and LH. Eur J Endocrinol 2002; 146: 75–79.

51.

Bougnères

François

Pantalone

et al . Effects of an early postnatal treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with a continuous subcutaneous infusion of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 2202–2205.

52.

Stoupa

Samara-Boustani

Flechtner

et al . Efficacy and Safety of continuous subcutaneous infusion of recombinant human gonadotropins for congenital micropenis during early infancy. Horm Res Paediatr 2017; 87: 103–110.

53.

Lambert

Bougnères

Growth and descent of the testes in infants with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism receiving subcutaneous gonadotropin infusion. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2016; 2016: 13.

54.

Graber

Seeley

Brooks-Gunn

et al . Is pubertal timing associated with psychopathology in young adulthood? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43: 718–726.

55.

Taranger

Delayed puberty. BMJ 1985; 291: 141–141.

56.

Varimo

Hero

Laitinen

et al . Health-related quality of life in male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2015; 83: 141–143.

57.

Dwyer

Quinton

Morin

et al . Identifying the unmet health needs of patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism using a web-based needs assessment: implications for online interventions and peer-to-peer support. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9: 83.

58.

Shiraishi

Oka

Matsuyama

Assessment of quality of life during gonadotrophin treatment for male hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014; 81: 259–265.

59.

Raivio

Toppari

Perheentupa

et al . Treatment of prepubertal gonadotrophin-deficient boys with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. Lancet 1997; 350: 263–264.

60.

Raivio

Wikström

Dunkel

Treatment of gonadotropin-deficient boys with recombinant human FSH: long-term observation and outcome. Eur J Endocrinol 2007; 156: 105–111.

61.

Büchter

Behre

Kliesch

et al . Pulsatile GnRH or human chorionic gonadotropin/human menopausal gonadotropin as effective treatment for men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a review of 42 cases. Eur J Endocrinol 1998; 139: 298–303.

62.

Liu

Banks

Barnes

et al . Two-year comparison of testicular responses to pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone and exogenous gonadotropins from the inception of therapy in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 67: 1140–1145.

63.

Yang

Zhang

Dong

et al . Application of hormonal treatment in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: more than ten years’ experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44: 393–399.

64.

Burris

Rodbard

Winters

et al . Gonadotropin therapy in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: the response to human chorionic gonadotropin is predicted by initial testicular size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 66: 1144–1151.

65.

Vicari

Mongioì

Calogero

et al . Therapy with human chorionic gonadotrophin alone induces spermatogenesis in men with isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism-long-term follow-up. Int J Androl 1992; 15: 320–329.

66.

Pitteloud

Hayes

Boepple

et al . The role of prior pubertal development, biochemical markers of testicular maturation, and genetics in elucidating the phenotypic heterogeneity of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 152–160.

67.

Liu

Baker

HWG

Jayadev

et al . Induction of spermatogenesis and fertility during gonadotropin treatment of gonadotropin-deficient infertile men: predictors of fertility outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 801–808.

68.

Prior

Stewart

McEleny

et al . Fertility induction in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Epub ahead of print 8 September 2018. DOI: 10.1111/cen.13850.

69.

Nieschlag

Bouloux

PMG

Stegmann

et al . An open-label clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corifollitropin alfa combined with hCG in adult men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017; 15: 17.

70.

Warne

Decosterd

Okada

et al . A combined analysis of data to identify predictive factors for spermatogenesis in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism treated with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 594–604.

71.

Burris

Clark

Vantman

et al . A low sperm concentration does not preclude fertility in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism after gonadotropin therapy. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 343–347.

72.

Liu

Gebski

Turner

et al . Predicting pregnancy and spermatogenesis by survival analysis during gonadotrophin treatment of gonadotrophin-deficient infertile men. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 625–633.

73.

Dwyer

Sykiotis

Hayes

et al . Trial of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone pretreatment for GnRH-induced fertility in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: E1790–1795.

74.

Sykiotis

Plummer

Hughes

et al . Oligogenic basis of isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 15140–15144.

75.

Mao

Liu

Nie

et al . Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy is associated with earlier spermatogenesis compared to combined gonadotropin therapy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Asian J Androl 2017; 19: 680–685.

76.

McEleny

Cheetham

Quinton

Should we be offering fertility preservation by surgical sperm retrieval to men with Klinefelter syndrome?

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017; 86: 463–466.

77.

Depenbusch

von Eckardstein

Simoni

et al . Maintenance of spermatogenesis in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal men with human chorionic gonadotropin alone. Eur J Endocrinol 2002; 147: 617–624.

78.

Sidhoum

Chan

Lippincott

et al . Reversal and relapse of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: resilience and fragility of the reproductive neuroendocrine system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: 861–870.

79.

Behre

Kliesch

Leifke

et al . Long-term effect of testosterone therapy on bone mineral density in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82: 2386–2390.

80.

Ring

Lwin

Köhler

Current medical management of endocrine-related male infertility. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 357.

Managing congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism: a contemporary approach directed at optimizing fertility and long-term outcomes in males

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Triphasic testicular maturation and hormonal control of spermatogenesis

Causes of hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

Congenital

Acquired

Clinical manifestations and diagnostic evaluation

Infants

Adolescents

Adults

Treatment strategies

Infants

Adolescents

Adults

Conventional sperm-induction regimens

(i) hCG monotherapy ± adjuvant FSH (hCG ± FSH)

(ii) Combined gonadotrophin treatment (hCG + FSH)

Sequential gonadotrophin treatment (FSH FSH + hCG)

Genetic counselling and screening of offspring

Artificial reproductive technology and sperm cryopreservation

Further considerations

Long-term management of classical hypogonadism

Alternative treatment for functional HH: aromatase inhibitors and selective oestrogen receptor modulators

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding

Ethical approval

Conflict of interest statement

ORCID iD

References