Influence of explosive casing materials and stiffener configurations on confined blast response of steel structures

Abstract

The confined explosion is a very complex and is a critical problem in various sectors such as defense, petrochemicals, important structures, and industrial structures. The explosives are generally enclosed in a casing. Steel is a commonly used explosive casing material and exhibits intricate and disastrous effects on the container structure, after the detonation of explosive sealed in it. The rupture of casing material develops shards, and these shards are responsible for damage to the container structure. Structure geometry and the material used for the explosive casing, affect the response of the structure subjected to explosions. The cubical or rectangular-shaped structures are generally used for blast resistance of structures. In this study, a finite element-based numerical investigation is conducted to estimate the dynamic response of steel cubical structure subjected to confined explosion. The influence of different lightweight explosive casing materials such as carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), and steel material on the response of the structure is assessed and compared. The initial velocities of the shards generated from explosive casings after the explosion are estimated and compared with code-based guidelines. Furthermore, the response of the un-stiffened and stiffened cubical structure with different stiffener configurations i.e., cross, plus vertical, horizontal, and v-type is compared, and an effective configuration of the stiffener is proposed with the highest blast resistance of the structure. It is observed that the CFRP and GFRP explosive casings show an enhanced energy dissipation ability compared to the steel explosive casing. Edge tearing and maximum central deflections are identified as the dominant failure modes, which can be controlled by using adequate stiffener configurations on the structure. The v-type stiffener and vertical stiffener configurations are found to be the most effective in resisting the effect of confined explosion compared to other configurations considering the strength and serviceability criteria.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

confined explosion edge tearing explosive casing shard steel structure stiffener

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

(1960) The elastic-plastic response of thin spherical shells to internal blast loading. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 27: 139–144.

Balkan

Demir

Arikoglu

(2020) Dynamic analysis of a stiffened composite plate under blast load: a new model and experimental validation. International Journal of Impact Engineering 143: 103591.

Chu

Wang

Yang

, et al. (2021) Analysis and design for the comprehensive ballistic and blast resistance of polyurea-coated steel plate. Defence Technology 19: 35–51.

Davis

(2012) Finite Element Modelling of Ballistic Impact on a Glass Fibre Composite Armor. Doctoral dissertation. California Polytechnic State University.

Demchuk

(1968) Method for designing explosion chambers. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 9(5): 558–559.

Dragos

Oehlers

(2013) Simplification of fully confined blasts for structural response analysis. Engineering Structures 56: 312–326.

Gangolu

Grisaro

(2025) Probabilistic modelling of steel column response to far-field detonations. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 255(255): 110665.

Goswami

Ganesh

Adhikary

(2022) Dynamic response prediction of RC structural components subjected to combined blast and fragment impact. Journal of Structural Engineering 148(2): 04021264.

Grisaro

Dancygier

(2021) Dynamic response of RC elements subjected to combined loading of blast and fragments. Journal of Structural Engineering 147(2): 04020315.

10.

Gunaryo

Hadi

(2019) A study of blast phenomenon due to an explosion of TNT encapsulated by steel casing shell: experimental and numerical analyses using LS-DYNA. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research 8(2): 202–206.

11.

Gurney

(1943) The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shells and grenades. Maryland: Ballistic Research Laboratories, BRL 405.

12.

Hader

(1983) Effects of bare and cased explosive charges on reinforced concrete walls. Zurich, Switzerland: Basler (Ernst) and Partners; 1983.

13.

Hutchinson

Price

(2014) On the continued acceleration of bomb casing fragments following casing fracture. Defence Technology 10: 211–218.

14.

Kadid

(2008) Stiffened plates subjected to uniform blast loading. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14: 155–161.

15.

Kloster

(2001) Coupled Lagrangian and Eulerian Approach to Detonation and Fragmentation Problems. Doctoral dissertation. Naval Postgraduate School.

16.

Linz

Fung

Lee

, et al. (2021) Response mechanisms of reinforced concrete panels to the combined effect of close-in blast and fragments: an integrated experimental and numerical analysis. International Journal of Protective Structures 12(1): 49–72.

17.

Matsagar

(2016) Comparative performance of composite sandwich panels and non-composite panels under blast loading. Materials and Structures 49(1-2): 611–629.

18.

Nyström

Gylltoft

(2009) Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 36(8): 995–1005.

19.

Pereira

Ghasemnejad

Wen

, et al. (2011) Blast response of cracked steel box structures repaired with carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composite patch. Materials and Design 32(5): 3092–3098.

20.

, et al. (2020) Safety assessment of generation III nuclear power plant buildings subjected to commercial aircraft crash part II: structural damage and vibrations. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 52(2): 397–416.

21.

Rana

Khan

Del Linz

, et al. (2019) Effect of cased charges on plain steel and steel-concrete sandwich targets. Thin-Walled Structures 136: 302–314.

22.

Schwer

(2004) Preliminary assessment of non-Lagrangian methods for penetration simulation. In: 8th International LS-DYNA User Conference, 8: 1-12, Detroit.

23.

Sharma

Singh

Matsagar

(2023) Modular design of industrial control room with steel and aluminum foam materials under internal or external blast loads. Interdisciplinary Symposium on Smart and Sustainable Infrastructures. Switzerland: Springer Nature, 999–1009.

24.

Sharma

Saini

Singh

, et al. (2025) Protection of steel and aluminum foam sandwich structure with polyurea and stiffeners under blast. Advances in Science and Technology 171: 101–110.

25.

Shi

Wang

Cui

(2020) Experimental studies on fragments of reinforced concrete slabs under close-in explosions. International Journal of Impact Engineering 144: 103630.

26.

Singh

Chakraborty

(2023) Effect of combined blast and fragment loading on RC wall and its mitigation using composite sections. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 37(5): 04023040.

27.

UFC-3-340-02 (2008) Structures to Resist the Effect of Accidental Explosions. US Departments of the Army, Navy, and the Air Force.

28.

Yao

Zhang

, et al. (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation on the dynamic response of steel chamber under internal blast. Engineering Structures 168: 877–888.

29.

Zhang

Yao

, et al. (2019) Dynamic response and damage analysis of steel box wall under internal blast loading. Advances in Mechanical Engineering II(I): 1–11.

30.

Zhao

(1989) Blast chamber. Explosion and Shock Waves 9(1): 85–96.

31.

Zhao

Yao

Zhang

, et al. (2020) Experimental and numerical studies on the dynamic response of stiffened plates under confined blast loads. Thin-Walled Structures 154: 106839.