This paper argues that critical perspectives have constituted a marginal yet continued presence in work and organizational (W-O) psychology and calls for a reflexive taking stock of these perspectives to ground a critical research agenda. We argue that critical W-O psychology has been positioned between a psychology literature with limited development of critical perspectives, and an emergent critical management literature that has allowed their selective development. This in-between position has allowed critical W-O psychology to persist, albeit in a fragmented form, while limiting its potential for theoretical and applied impact. We use this diagnosis to reflect on how critical perspectives can best develop from within W-O psychology. We end with a call for developing a critical movement unique to the current historical moment, drawing upon without repeating the experiences of its home disciplines, in a future oriented and reflexive psychology research agenda.
AbbottA. (2001). The chaos of disciplines. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbdelnourS.HasselbladhH.KallinikosJ.(2017). Agency and institutions in organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1775–1792.
3.
AckersP. (2006). The history of occupational psychology: A view from industrial relations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(2), 213–216.
4.
AckroydS. (2004). Methodology for management and organisation studies: Some implications of critical realism. In FleetwoodS.AckroydS. (Eds.), Critical realist applications in organisation and management studies. Routledge.
5.
AdlerP. S.ForbesL. C.WillmottH. (2007). Critical management studies. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 119–179.
6.
AguinisH.BradleyK. J.BrodersenA. (2014). Industrial–organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(2014), 284–303.
7.
AlcadipaniR.HassardJ.IslamG. (2018). “I shot the sheriff”: Irony, sarcasm and the changing nature of workplace resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1452–1487.
8.
AlexandrovaA. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. Oxford University Press.
9.
AlexandrovaA.HaybronD. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid?Philosophy of Science, 83 (5), 1098–1109.
10.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644.
AmisJ.SilkM. L. (2008). Understanding quality: The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research. Organization Research Methods, 11(3), 456–480.
13.
AndersonP. (2017). The H-word: The peripeteia of hegemony. Verso.
14.
AnseelF.CaretteB.LangJ. W.LievensF. (2014). The move to business schools: How is industrial–Organizational psychology holding up in Europe?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 365–370.
15.
AnseelF.Van LysebettenS.Van EsR.RosseelJ. (2018). Our neoliberal fantasies? A preliminary test of research trends in leading journals in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 549–551.
16.
ArendtH. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
17.
ArnaudG.VidailletB. (2018). Clinical and critical: The Lacanian contribution to management and organization studies. Organization, 25(1), 69–97.
18.
AxelE. (2009). What makes us talk about wing nuts?: Critical psychology and subjects at work. Theory Psychology, 19(2), 275–295.
19.
BalP. M.DóciE. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 536–548.
20.
BalP. M.DóciE.LubX.RossenbergY. G. T. V.NijsS.AchnakS.BrinerR. B.BrookesA.ChudzikowskiK.De CoomanR.De GieterS.De JongJ.De JongS. B.DorenboschL.Ghoreishi GalugahiM. A.Hack-PolayD.HofmansJ.HornungS.KhudaK.KlamerR.…ZelstM. V. (2019). Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 289–299.
21.
BansalTSmithW. K.VaaraE. (2018). From the editors: New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195.
22.
BaritzL. (1960). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. Wesleyan University Press.
23.
BettacheK.ChiuC.-Y. (2019). The invisible hand is an ideology: Toward a social psychology of neoliberalism. Journal of Social Issues, 75, 8–19.
24.
BloomP. (2016). Work as the contemporary limit of life: Capitalism, the death drive, and the lethal fantasy of ‘work–life balance’. Organization, 23(4), 588–606.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
32.
CascioW. F.AguinisH. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062–1081.
33.
CassellC.SymonG. (2006). Qualitative methods in industrial and organizational psychology. In HodgkinsonG. P.FordJ. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2006 (Vol. 21, pp. 339–380). Wiley.
34.
CastañedaD. A.SanchezG. (1978). Problemas de la importación tecnológica psicolaboral en los países en desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 10, 71–82.
35.
CavellS. (1979). The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film. Harvard University Press.
36.
CederströmC.SpicerA. (2015). The wellness syndrome. Polity Press.
37.
CelikatesR. (2006). From critical social theory to a social theory of critique: On the critique of ideology after the pragmatic turn. Constellations, 13(1), 21–40.
38.
ChristopherJ. C.HickinbottomS. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18(5), 563–589.
39.
ColellaA.HeblM.KingE. B. (2017). One hundred years of discrimination research in the journal of applied psychology: A sobering synopsis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102,500–513.
40.
ContuA. (2008). Decaf resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 364–379.
CullinaneN.DundonT. (2006). The psychological contract: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 113–129.
43.
CunliffeA.CouplandC. (2012). From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations, 65(1), 63–88.
44.
DashtipourP. (2015). Social psychology: A commentary on organizational research. In: ParkerI. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Psychology (pp. 79–87). Routledge.
45.
DaviesW. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. Verso.
46.
de KockF. (2017). Industrial, work, and organizational psychology in Africa. In The Sage handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (2nd ed.). SAGE.
47.
DelbridgeR.SallazJ. J. (2015). Work: Four worlds and ways of seeing. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1449–1462.
48.
De VosJ. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. Routledge.
49.
DearyI. J.AustinE. J.CarylP. G. (2000). Testing versus understanding human intelligence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 180–190.
50.
DejoursC.DerantyJ. P. (2010). The centrality of work. Critical Horizons, 11(2), 167–180.
51.
DelbridgeR.KeenoyT. (2010). Beyond managerialism?International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(6), 799–814.
52.
DesrosièresA. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Harvard University Press.
53.
DickP.NadinS. (2006). Reproducing gender inequalities? A critique of realist assumptions underpinning personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 481–498.
54.
DidierE.TassetC. (2013). Pour un statactivisme. La quantification comme instrument d’ouverture du possible. Revue de Sciences Humaines, 24,123–140.
55.
DóciE.BalP. M. (2018). Ideology in work and organizational psychology: The responsibility of the researcher. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 558–560.
56.
EmreM. (2018). The personality brokers: The strange history of Myers-Briggs and the birth of personality testing. Random House.
57.
ErlerJ. (2015). Bold alliances aid translational work. Nature, 517, 438.
58.
FelinT.FossN. J.PloyhartR. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632.
59.
FerrerasI.BattilanaJ.MédaD. (2020). Le Manifeste Travail. Démocratiser, démarchandiser, dépolluer. Le Seuil.
60.
FineM. (2012). Resuscitating critical psychology for “revolting” times. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 416–438.
61.
FiskeA. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.
62.
FlemingP. (2009). Authenticity and the cultural politics of work. OUP.
63.
FlemingP. (2015). The mythology of work. Pluto Press.
64.
FotakiM. (2020). Feminist research changing organizations and societies: Taking stock and looking to the future. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30, 390–399.
65.
FotakiM.KennyK.VachhaniS. J. (2017). Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters. Organization, 24(1), 3–17.
66.
FraserN.HonnethA. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political- philosophical exchange. Verso.
67.
GabrielY. (1999). Organizations in depth: Psychoanalysis of organizations. SAGE.
68.
GardnerD. M.RyanA. M.SnoeyinkM. (2018). How are we doing? An examination of gender representation in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 369–388.
69.
GerardN. (2014). Searching for capitalism. The Industrial Organizational Psycholgist, 51(3), 85–86.
70.
GerardN. (2016). Towards a critical IO psychology. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 54.
71.
GerardN. (2017). Handmaidens to capitalism. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10, 410–414.
72.
GergenK. J. (2016). Toward a visionary psychology. Humanistic Psychologist, 44, 3–17.
GodardJ. (2014). The psychologization of employment relations?Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 1–18.
75.
GordoÁ.De VosJ. (2010). Psychologism, psychologising and de-psychologisation. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 8, 3–10.
76.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Hoare andQ.SmithG. N., Eds. and Trans.). Lawrence & Wishart.
77.
GreenS. E.LiY. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency, and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 662–1697.
78.
GreyC. (2018). Does Brexit mean the end for critical management studies in Britain?Organization, 25(5), 662–670.
HabermasJ. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
83.
HammersleyM. (2005). Should social science be critical?Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35(2), 175–195.
84.
HarleyB.FaemsD. (2017). Theoretical progress in management studies and the role of qualitative research. Journal of Management Studies, 54(3), 366–367.
85.
HaslamA. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. SAGE.
86.
HassardJ. (1994). Postmodernist organizational analysis: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 303–24.
87.
HattonE. (2017). Mechanisms of invisibility: Rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work, Employment and Society, 31(2), 336–351.
88.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
89.
HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC.WalkerdineV. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. Routledge.
90.
HillD. B. (2006). Theory in applied social psychology: Past mistakes and future hopes. Theory & Psychology, 16, 613–640.
91.
HollwayW. (1991). Work psychology and organizational behaviour: Managing the individual at work. SAGE.
92.
HookD. (2005). A critical psychology of the postcolonial. Theory & Psychology, 15(4), 475–503.
93.
HorkheimerM. (1992). Traditional and critical theory. In IngramD.Simon-IngramJ. (Eds.), Critical theory: The essential readings (pp. 239–254). Paragon House. (Original work published 1937).
94.
HornungS. (2012). Beyond “new scientific management” critical reflections on the epistemology of evidence-based management. In: RousseauD. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford University Press.
95.
HornungS.HögeT. (2019). Humanization, rationalization or subjectification of work? Employee-oriented flexibility between i-deals and ideology in the neoliberal era. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7, 3090–3119.
96.
IslamG. (2012). Recognition, reification, and practices of forgetting: Ethical implications of Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 37–48.
97.
IslamG. (2015). Extending organizational cognition: A conceptual exploration of mental extension in organizations. Human Relations, 68(3), 463–487.
98.
IslamG. (2020). Psychology and business ethics: A multi-level research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 1–13.
IslamG.ZyphurM. (2006). Critical industrial psychology: What is it and where is it?Psychology in Society, 34, 17–30.
101.
IslamG.ZyphurM. (2009). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., p. 17). SAGE.
102.
JacksonB. (2001). Management gurus and management fashions. Routledge.
103.
JohnsonP.BuehringA.CassellC.SymonG. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 131–156.
104.
JonesC.O’DohertyD. (Eds.). (2005). Manifestos for the business school of tomorrow. Dvalin Books.
105.
KaufmanB. E. (2020). The real problem: The deadly combination of psychologisation, scientism, and normative promotionalism takes strategic human resource management down a 30-year dead end. Human Resource Management Journal, 30, 49–72.
106.
KleinV. H.(2015). Bringing values back in: The limitations of institutional logics and the relevance of dialectical phenomenology. Organization, 22(3), 326–350.
107.
KönigC.FellC.KellnhoferL.SchuiG. (2015). Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?Scientometrics, 105, 1931–1952.
108.
KoppesL. L. (2007). Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology. Psychology Press.
109.
KornhauserA. (1947). Industrial psychology as management technique and as social science. American Psychologist, 2, 224–229.
110.
LamontP. (2020). The construction of “critical thinking”: Between how we think and what we believe. History of Psychology, 23(3), 232–251.
111.
LawlerE. E. (1971). Thoughts about the future. Professional Psychology, 2, 21–22.
112.
LawsonT. (2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(4), 483–505.
113.
LawthomR. (1999). Using the ‘F’ word in organizational psychology: Foundations for critical feminist research. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 1, 65–78.
114.
LefkowitzJ. (2011). The science, practice, and morality of work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 112–115.
115.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.
116.
LoackerB.MuhrS. L. (2009). How can I become a responsible subject? Towards a practice-based ethics of responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 265–277.
117.
LockeR. R.SpenderJ. C. (2011). Confronting managerialism. Zed Books.
118.
LykesM. B. (2003). Developing an activist liberatory community psychology: One step at a time. The Community Psychologist, 36(4), 39–42.
119.
ManroopL. (2017). A multiparadigm approach to job search scholarship. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(4), 330–356.
120.
MatherR. (2003). Hegemony and Marxist psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13(4), 469–487.
121.
MathieuJ. E.ChenG. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 610–641.
122.
McDonaldM.Bubna-LiticD. (2012). Applied social psychology: A critical theoretical perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 853–864.
123.
McDonaldM.Bubna-LiticD. (2017). Critical organisational psychology. In GoughB. (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology (pp. 597–619). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
124.
McKennaS.RichardsonJ.ManroopL. (2011). Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 148–157.
MennickenA.EspelandW. N. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 1–23.
127.
MeuseK. P. D.TangK.FeilK. (2014). A critical analysis of topical content and authorship trends in applied psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 47(4), 45–50.
128.
MillerP.RoseN. (1995). Production, identity, and democracy. Theory and Society, 24(3), 427–467.
129.
MillsA. J.MillsJ. H. (2013). CMS: A satirical critique of three narrative histories. Organization, 20(1), 117–129.
130.
MillsJ. H.ThurlowA.MillsA. J. (2010). Making sense of sensemaking: The critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 5, 182–195.
131.
MillwardL. J. (2006). The transition to motherhood in an organizational context: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 315–333.
132.
MondoL. J.KrautA. I. (2010). Does globalization change I-O research? Not that much, so far. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 47.
MumbyD. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—A critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 429–443.
135.
MünsterbergH. (1913). Psychology and industrial efficiency. Constable.
136.
MyersC. G. (2016). Where in the world are the workers? Cultural underrepresentation in I-O research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 144–152.
137.
NordW. R. (1977). Job satisfaction reconsidered. American Psychologist, 32, 1026–1035.
138.
NoronhaE.D’CruzP. (2017). Critical perspectives on work and employment in globalizing India. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited.
139.
NyeinK. P.CaylorJ. R.DuongN. S.FryT. N.WildmanJ. L. (2020). Beyond positivism: Toward a pluralistic approach to studying “real” teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 10, 87–112.
140.
PalmerD. (2006). Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another’s work: ASQ 50 years out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 535–559.
141.
ParkerI. (2009). Critical psychology and revolutionary Marxism. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 71–92.
ParkerS.ParkerM. (2017). Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in critical management studies: Alternative organizations as allies. Human Relations, 70, 366–1387.
144.
PetriglieriG.PetriglieriJ. L.(2010). Identity workspaces: The case of business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(1), 44–60.
PorterT. M. (1993). Statistics and the politics of objectivity. Revue de Synthèse, 114, 87–101.
147.
PowerM. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford.
148.
PrasadA.PrasadP. (2002). The coming of age of interpretive organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 4–11.
149.
PrattM. G.BonaccioS. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 93–715.
150.
PrilleltenskyI. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. State University of New York Press.
151.
PrilleltenskyI.SteadG. B. (2013). Critical psychology, well-being, and work. In BlusteinD. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the psychology of working (pp. 19–36). Oxford University Press.
152.
PrinsS. (2006). The psychodynamic perspective in organizational research: Making sense of the dynamics of direction setting in emergent collaborative processes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 335–355.
153.
ProvisC. (1996). Unitarism pluralism, interests and values. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34, 473–495.
154.
Pulido-MartinezH. (2019). Outlining critical psychology of work in Latin America. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 672–689.
155.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 11401–11405.
156.
RaynardM.KodeihF.GreenwoodR. (2019). Proudly elitist and undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices. Organization Studies, 42(1), 7–33.
157.
ReadingB. (1997). The university in ruins. Harvard University Press.
158.
ReedyP. C.KingD. R. (2019). Critical performativity in the field: Methodological principles for activist ethnographers. Organizational Research Methods, 22, 564–589.
159.
ReichmanW. (2014). Industrial and organizational psychology encounters the world. In ReichmanW. (Ed.), Industrial and organizational psychology help the vulnerable serving the underserved (pp.1–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
160.
RhodesC.WrightC.PullenA. (2018). Changing the world? The politics of activism and impact in the neoliberal university. Organization, 25(1), 139–147.
161.
RobersonQ. M. (2019). Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 69 –88.
162.
RoseN. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press.
163.
RoseN. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press.
164.
RoseN. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). Free Association Books.
165.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ. (2011). How come the critters came to be teaching in business schools? Contradictions in the institutionalization of critical management studies. Organization, 18(5), 673–689.
166.
RudolphC. W.ZacherH. (2018). What are the mechanisms? The black box of neoliberalism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 556–557.
167.
RuppD. S.FolgerR.SkarlickiD.ShaoR. (2017). A critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of ‘organizational justice’: Is it time for reassessment?Academy of Management Annals, 11(2),919–959.
SagivLSchwartzS.H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.
170.
SalterP.AdamsG. (2013). Toward a critical race psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(11), 781–793.
171.
SchoenfeldtL. F. (1999). From dust bowl empiricism to rational constructs in biographical data. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 147–167.
172.
SilverstoneR. (1994). The power of the ordinary: On cultural studies and the sociology of culture. Sociology, 28(4), 991–1001.
173.
StawB. D. (2016). Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–19.
174.
SteffyB. D.GrimesA. J. (1986). A critical theory of organization science. Academy of Management Review, 11, 322–336.
175.
SteffyB. D.GrimesA. J. (1992). Personnel/organizational psychology: A critique of the discipline. In AlvessonM.WillmottH. (Eds.), Critical management studies. SAGE.
176.
SugarmanJ. (2005). Persons and moral agency. Theory & Psychology, 15(6), 793–811.
177.
SymonG.BuehringA.JohnsonP.CassellC. (2008). Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labour process. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1315–1336.
178.
SymonG.CassellC. (2006). Neglected perspectives in work and organizational psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 307–314.
179.
TeoT. (1999). Methodologies of critical psychology: Illustrations from the field of racism. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 1, 119–134.
180.
TeoT. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243–254.
181.
TeoT. (2018). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. Palgrave Macmillan.
182.
TeoT.AfşinB. (2020). The impossible conditions of the possibility of an alter-global psychology. In SundararajanL.HwangK. -K.YehK.-H. (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives (pp. 159–174). Palgrave Macmillan.
183.
TrothA. C.GuestD. E. (2020). The case for psychology in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Journal, 30, 34–48.
184.
VaaraE. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–810.
185.
VachhaniS. J. (2012). The subordination of the feminine? Developing a critical feminist approach to the psychoanalysis of organizations. Organization Studies, 33(9),1237–1255.
186.
van DijkH.KooijD.Karanika-MurrayM.De VosA.MeyerB. (2020). Meritocracy a myth? A multilevel perspective of how social equality accumulates through work. Organizational Psychology Review, 10(3–4), 240–269.
187.
VandenBosG. R.WinklerJ. M. (2015). An analysis of the status of journals and research in psychology from Latin America. Psicologia: Reflexão Crítica, 28, 82–93.
188.
VisserM. (2019). Pragmatism, critical theory and business ethics: Converging lines. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 45–57.
189.
WeberW. G.HögeT.HornungS. (2020). Past, present, and future of critical perspectives in work and organizational psychology—A commentary on Bal (2020). Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie [German Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology], 64, 207–215.
190.
WeberW. G.UnterrainerC.HögeT. (2020). Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta-analysis of individual organisational, and societal outcomes. Applied Psychology, 69, 1009–1071.
191.
WestwoodR. I.JackG. (2007). Manifesto for a post-colonial international business and management studies: A provocation. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 3(3), 246–265.
192.
Wray-BlissE. (2004). ‘A right to respond? Monopolisation of ‘voice’ in CMS’. Ephemera, 4(2): 101–120.
193.
ZacherH. (2019). A critical perspective on “critical organizational scholarship”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 456–459.
194.
ZanoniP.ThoelenA.YbemaS. (2017). Unveiling the subject behind diversity: Exploring the micro-politics of representation in ethnic minority creatives’ identity work. Organization, 24(3), 330–354.
195.
ZickarM. J. (2010). Recognizing the need for a humanistic movement within industrial–organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 97–99.
196.
ZyphurM. J.PieridesD. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16.
197.
ZyphurM. J.PieridesD. C. (2019). Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 1–18.
