This article discusses the development of goal setting theory through induction. The processes such as formulating concepts and definitions, measurement issues, data gathering, data integration and presentation, identifying moderators and mediators, resolving contradictions, noting issues in application, expansions and extensions, and the role of induction in deduction are explained. A multi-decade effort that involves these processes led to a useful theory that has withstood the test of time.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.
2.
AlessandriG.BorgogniL.LathamG. P.CepaleG.TheodorouA.De LongisE. (2020). Self-set goals improve academic performance through nonlinear effects on daily study performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 77, 101784.
3.
AmabileT.KramerSt. (2011). The progress principle. Harvard Business Review Press.
4.
AmbroseM. L.KulikC. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 231–292.
5.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1958). Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies, and incentives. In AtkinsonJ. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. Van Nostrand.
6.
AudiaG.KristofA.BrownK. G.LockeE. A. (1996). The relationship of goals and micro-level work processes to performance on a multi-path, manual task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 483–497.
7.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.
8.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
9.
BanduraA.LockeE. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.
10.
BaumJ. R. (2013). Goals and entrepreneurship. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge
11.
BeckA. (2019). The 60-year evolution of cognitive theory and therapy. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 14(1),16–20.
12.
BeckerT. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.
13.
BockL. (2015). Work rules. Twelve.
14.
CampbellJ. P.WilmotM. P. (2018). The function of theory in IWOP. In AndersonN.OnesD. S.SinangilH. K.ViswesvaranC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (IWOP) (2nd ed.). Sage.
15.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
16.
ChenX.LathamG. P.PiccoloRItzchakovG. (2020). An enumerative review and a meta-analysis of primed goal effects on organizational behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review. doi: 10.1111/apps.1223
17.
DarwinC. (1958 [1859]). The origin of species. New American Library (Penguin).
18.
DoerrJ. (2018). Measure what matters. Penguin.
19.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
20.
ErezM. (1977). Feedback; a necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624–627.
21.
HarrimanD. (2010). The logical leap: Induction in physics. New American Library.
HeslinP. A.CaprarD. V. (2013). Goals and self-efficacy as mediators. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
24.
HeslinP. A.WangK. L. (2013). Determinants of goals. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
25.
HowardA. (2013). The predictive validity of conscious and subconscious motives on career advancement. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
26.
JohnsG. (2017). Incorporating context in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 42, 577–595.
27.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
28.
KerrS.LePelleyD. (2013). Stretch goals: Risks, possibilities, and best practices. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
29.
KleinH. J.CooperJ. T.MonahanC. A. (2013). Goal commitment. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
30.
KramerW. SThayerA. L.SalasE. (2013). Goal setting in teams. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
31.
LathamG. P. (2012). Work motivation: History. Theory, research, and practice. Sage.
32.
LathamG. P. (2019). Perspectives of a practitioner-scientist on organizational psychology/organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology/Organizational Behavior, 6, 1–16.
33.
LathamG. P.BrcicJ.SteinhauerA. (2017). Toward an integration of goal setting theory and the automaticity model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 66, 25–48.
34.
LathamG. P.ErezM.LockeE. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772.
35.
LathamG. P.GanegodaD. B.LockeE. A. (2011). Goal setting: A state theory, but related to traits. In Chamorro-PremuzicT.StummS. V.FurhamA. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences. Wiley-Blackwell.
36.
LathamG. P.HuJ.BrcicJ. (2020). The effect of a context-specific primed goal on goal commitment and team performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review. doi: 10.1111/apps.12207
37.
LathamG. P.KinneS. B. (1974). Improving job performance through training in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 187–191.
38.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (2006). Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 332–340.
39.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (2013). Potential pitfalls in goal setting and how to avoid them. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 593–604). Routledge.
40.
LathamG. P.MitchellT. R.DossettD. L. (1978). Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 163–171.
41.
LathamG. P.YuklG. A. (1975). Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 299–302.
42.
LathamG. P.YuklG. A. (1976). The effects of assigned and participative goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 166–171.
43.
LewinK. (1945). The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126–136.
44.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally.
45.
LockeE. A.KirkpatrickS.WheelerJ. K.SchniederJ.NilesK.GoldsteinH.WelshK.ChahD. (1991). The essence of leadership: The four keys to leading successfully. Lexington Books.
46.
LockeE. A. (2001). Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In ErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Erlbaum.
47.
LockeE. A. (2003). Good definitions: The epistemological foundation of scientific progress. In GreenbergJ. (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science. L. Erlbaum.
48.
LockeE. A. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33, 867–890.
49.
LockeE. A. (2009). It’s time we brought introspection out of the closet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 24–25.
50.
LockeE. A. (2012). Construct vs. concept validity. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 146–148.
51.
LockeE. A. (2015). Theory building, replication, and behavioural priming: Where do we go from here?Perspectives in Psychological Science, 10, 408–414.
52.
LockeE. A. (2018). The illusion of determinism: Why free will is real and causal. Edwin A. Locke.
53.
LockeE. A. (2019a). Some observations about goals, money and cheating in business. Organizational Dynamics, 48, 1–5.
54.
LockeE. A. (2019b). What makes writing about goals work?Academy of Management Discoveries, (Guideposts), 5, 1–2.
55.
LockeE. A.BryanJ. F. (1968). Grade goals as determinants of academic achievement. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 217–228.
56.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task performance. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
59.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
60.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2019a). Does prospect theory add or subtract from our understanding of goal directed motivation? In StoneD. L.DulebohnJ. H. (Eds.), The only thing that is constant in HRM today is change (research in human resource management). Information Age Publishing.
61.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2019b). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5, 93–105.
62.
MaceC. A. (1935). Incentives: Some experimental studies. Industrial health research board (Great Britain), Report No, 72.
63.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper.
64.
MasudaA. D.LockeE. A.WilliamsK. J. (2015). The effects of simultaneous learning and performance goals on performance: An inductive exploration. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 37–52.
65.
MawritzM. B.FolgerM.LathamG. P. (2014). Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger and anxiety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 358–372.
66.
McGregorD. M. (1975). The human side of enterprise. McGraw Hill.
67.
MentoA. J.LockeE. A.KleinH. (1992). Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 395–405.
68.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on the capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
69.
MischelW. (2009). Becoming a cumulative science. APS Observer, 22, 1.
70.
MitchellT. R.DanielsD. (2003). Observations and commentary on recent research in work motivation. Motivation and Work Behavior, 7, 225–254.
71.
MorisanoD.HirshJ. B.PetersonJ. B.PihlR. O.ShoreB. M. J. (2010). Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 255–264.
72.
OettingenG.WittchenM.GollwitzerP. M. (2013). Regulating goals pursuit through mental contrasting with implementation intentions. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.]
73.
OnesD. S.KaiserR. B.Chamorro-PremuzicT.SvenssonC. (2017). Has industrial-organizational psychology lost its way? The industrial-organizational psychologist. http://www.siop.org/tip/april17,lostio.aspx
74.
OrdonezL. D.SchweitzerM. E.GalinskyA. D.BazermanM. H. (2009). Goal gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6–16.
75.
PeikoffL. (1991). Objectivism: The philosophy of Ayn Rand. Dutton.
76.
PopperK. (2003). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
77.
PorterL. W. (1961). A study of perceived need satisfactions in bottom and middle management jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 1–10.
78.
PritchardR. D.YoungB. L.KoenigN.SchmerlingD.DixonN. W. (2013). Long-term effects of goal setting on performance with the productivity measurement and enhancement system (Promes). In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
79.
RandA. (1990). Introduction to objectivist epistemology. NAL Books.
80.
RonanW. W.LathamG. P.KinneS. B. (1973). The effects of goal setting and supervision on worker behavior in an industrial situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 302–307.
81.
RyanT. A.SmithP. C. (1954). Principles of industrial psychology. Ronald.
82.
SassoT.Gonzalez-MorenoM. G. (2018). Centering the target of mistreatment in our measures. Industrial & Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 11(1), 107–112.
83.
SchippersM. C.MorisanoD.LockeE. A.ScheepersW. A.LathamG. P.de JongE. M. (2020). Writing about personal goals and plans regardless of goal type boosts academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 1010.
84.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P. (2005). Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used?Academy of Management Perspectives, 19, 124–131.
85.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P.TasaK.LathamB. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227–239.
86.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P.WoodwarkM. (2013). Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review. In LockeE. ALathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
87.
ShantzA.LathamG. P. (2009) An exploratory field experiment of the effects of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 109(1), 9–17.
88.
ShantzA.LathamG. P. (2011) The effect of primed goals on employee performance: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 50(2), 289–299.
89.
ShawJ. D. (2017). Advantages of starting with a theory. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 819–822.
90.
StajkovicA. D.LockeE. A.BlairE. S. (2006). A first examination of the relationships between primed subconscious goals, assigned conscious goals, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1172.
91.
SunS. H.FreseM. (2013). Multiple goal pursuit. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
92.
TraversC. (2013). Using goal setting theory to promote personal development. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
93.
VroomV. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
94.
WoodR. F.WhelanJ.SojoV.WongM. (2013). Goals, goal orientation, strategies, and performance. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
95.
WuG.HeathC.LarrickR. (2008). A prospect theory model of goal behavior. University of Chicago, graduate school of business. Unpublished manuscript.
