The morphological architecture and enzymatic hydrolysis of Brassica campestris straw after pretreatment with alkali and then with laccase was investigated. The results show that the diameters and depths of holes on the surface using the alkali and laccase pretreatment are larger than those observed with alkali pretreatment alone. At the same time, the crystallinity indices after alkali and laccase pretreatment are 1.1% higher compared with those observed after alkali pretreatment alone. The components were investigated, and saccharification analysis was carried out. The results showed that the contents of glucose (121 ± 1.1 g/L), xylose (55.9 ± 1.4 g/L), and total reducing sugar (195.3 ± 8.2 g/L) with the alkali and laccase treatment are 38, 193, and 69% higher than with the alkali pretreatment alone. Correspondingly, saccharification reaches 48.8 and 28.9% respectively with the alkali and laccase pretreatment and with the alkali treatment alone.
TsoskounogiouM., AyeridesG., and TritopoulouE.The end of cheap oil: current status and prospects. Energy Policy, 36 (2008) 3797–3806.
2.
DorianJ.P., FranssenH.T., and SimbeckD.R.Global challenges in energy. Energy Policy, 34 (2006) 1984–1991.
3.
SunY., and ChengJ.Y.Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol., 83 (2002) 1–11.
4.
BjerreA.B., OlesenA.B., FernqvistT., PlogerA., and SchmidtA.S.Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicellulose. Biotechnol. Bioengng, 49 (1996) 568–577.
5.
ChatterjeeM., MatsushimaK., IkushimaY., SatoM., YokoyamaT., KawanamiH., and SuzukiT.Production of linear alkane via hydrogenative ring opening of a furfural-derived compound in supercritical carbon dioxide. Green Chem., 12 (2010) 779–782.
6.
ZhuS.D., WuY.X., YuZ.N., LiaoJ.T., and ZhangY.Pretreatment by microwave/alkali of rice straw and its enzymic hydrolysis. Process Biochem., 40 (2005) 3082–3086.
7.
MartinezA.T., SperanzaM., Ruiz-DuenasF.J., FerreiraP., CamareroS., GuillenF., MartinezM.J., GutierrezA., and del RioJ.C.Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int. Microbiol., 8 (2005) 195–204.
8.
KumarR., SinghS., and SinghO.V.Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35 (2008) 377–391.
9.
BernardiR., NegriA., RonchiS., and PalmieriS.Isolation of the epithiospecifier protein from oil-rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) seed and its characterization. FEBS Lett., 467 (2000) 296–298.
10.
BeheraB.K., AroraM., and SharmaD.K.Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) studies on structural architecture of lignocellulosic materials of Calotropis procera during its processing for saccharification. Bioresour. Technol., 58 (1996) 241–245.
11.
MurugesanK., NamI.H., KimY.M., and ChangY.S.Decolorization of reactive dyes by a thermostable laccase produced by Ganoderma lucidum in solid state culture. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 40 (2007) 1662–1672.
12.
FukushimaY., and KirkT.K.Laccase component of the Ceriporiopsis subvemispora lignin-degrading system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61 (1995) 872–876.
13.
ChenS.C., MaD.B., GeW., and BuswellJ.A.Induction of laccase activity in the edible straw mushroom, Volvariella volvacea.FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 218 (2003) 143–148.
14.
RoseiroJ.C., ConceiçãoC.A., and Amaral-CollaçoM.T.Membrane concentration of fungal cellulases. Bioresource Technology1993; 43: 155–160.
15.
GhoseT.K.Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem., 59 (1987) 257–268.
16.
MillerG.L.Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analyt. Chem., 31 (1959) 426–428.
17.
KanamoriH., KanemitsuK., MiyasakaT., AmekuK., EndoS., AoyagiT., IndenK., HattaM., YamamotoN., KunishimaH., YanoH., KakuK., HirakataY., and KakuM.Measurement of (1–3)-beta-D-glucan derived from different gauze types. Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 217 (2009) 117–121.
18.
FadnisA.G., and TensonP.A.Kinetic method for the estimation of aldopentoses. J. Indian Chem. Soc., 86 (2009) 72–75.
19.
BonsignoreA., VergnanoC., and SegniP.Determination of aldopentoses in the presence of ketopentoses. Bol. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sperim., 34 (1958) 324–327.
20.
ZhaoH.B., KwakJ.H., ZhangZ.C., BrownH.M., AreyB.W., and HolladayJ.E.Studying cellulose fiber structure by SEM, XRD, NMR and acid hydrolysis. Carbohydrate Polym., 68 (2007) 235–241.
21.
KumarR., MagoG., BalanV., and WymanC.E.Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour. Technol., 100 (2009) 3948–3962.
22.
WuQ.L., GuS.Y., GongJ.H., and PanD.SEM/STM studies on the surface structure of a novel carbon fiber from lyocell. Synthetic Metals, 156 (2006) 792–795.
23.
LehringerC., DanielG., and SchmittU.TEM/FE-SEM studies on tension wood fibres of Acer spp., Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. Wood Sci. Technol., 43 (2009) 691–702.
24.
XuJ.L., ChengJ.J., Sharma-ShivappaR.R., and BurnsJ.C.Lime pretreatment of switchgrass at mild temperatures for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol., 101 (2010), 2900–2903.
25.
ZhangY.H.P., and LyndL.R.Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioengng, 88 (2004), 797–824.
26.
MosierN., WymanC., DaleB., ElanderR., LeeY.Y., HoltzappleM., and LadischM.Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol., 96 (2005) 673–686.
27.
XuZ., WangQ.H., JiangZ.H., YangX.X., and JiY.Z.Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw. Biomass Bioenergy, 31 (2007) 162–167.
28.
VallsC, VidalT, and RonceroM.B.The role of xylanases and laccases on hexenuronic acid and lignin removal. Process Biochem., 45 (2010) 425–430.
29.
AreskoghD., LiJ., NousiainenP., GellerstedtG., SipilaJ., and HenrikssonG.Oxidative polymerisation of models for phenolic lignin end-groups by laccase. Holzforschung, 64 (2010) 21–34.
30.
PengX.W., ZhongL.X., RenJ.L., and SunR.C.Laccase and alkali treatments of cellulose fibre. Surface lignin and its influences on fibre surface properties and interfacial behaviour of sisal fibre/phenolic resin composites. Composites Part A –Appl. Sci. Mfg, 41 (2010) 1848–1856.
