Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and NAFLD with different comorbidities and risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and abnormal albuminuria.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 3872 Chinese individuals excluding those with hepatitis B or C infection and absence of alcohol abuse were included in the study. NAFLD was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography. The liver fibrosis was assessed by NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² and/or abnormal albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ⩾ 3 mg/mmol). The logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between NAFLD and NAFLD with different comorbidities and risk of CKD.

Results:

The prevalence of CKD and abnormal albuminuria was higher in individuals with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD (15.8% vs 11.9%, p < 0.001; 14.8% vs 11.0%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that NAFLD was risk factor of CKD. Notably, after adjustment for sex, age, and DM, NAFLD was associated with 1.31-fold higher risk of prevalent CKD ⩾ 1 (p < 0.05). NAFLD individuals with elder age, DM, obesity, hypertension, MetS, and advanced liver fibrosis had higher risks of both prevalent CKD and abnormal albuminuria than those without comorbidities.

Conclusions:

NAFLD and NAFLD with traditional comorbidities are strongly associated with risk of prevalence of CKD and abnormal albuminuria. Patients with NAFLD especially those with coexisting comorbidities were recommended to carefully access the development of CKD.

Keywords

CKD liver fibrosis NAFLD

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases¹ and has become a worldwide health burden over the past two decades. The prevalence of NAFLD has been reported to be approximately 25% in the general population, and it appears to be rapidly increasing, with an estimated 3.6 million new cases annually.² NAFLD includes a broad range of disease spectrum, such as simple hepatic steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which with time can progress to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or the need for a liver transplant.³ Studies have demonstrated that NAFLD not only leads to end-stage liver disease but is also strongly associated with extrahepatic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.⁴

The known risk factors for NAFLD are strongly similar to those of chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD was defined by a low serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and/or raised urinary albumin measured by the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR).⁵ The prevalence of CKD is estimated to be 9.1% in the global population, which amounts to approximately 700 million cases and brings heavy health burden and socioeconomic costs.⁶ Some studies reported that the prevalence and incidence risk of CKD were significantly increased among NAFLD patients compared with those without NAFLD.^7,8 Furthermore, CKD is independently associated with an increased overall mortality among patients with NAFLD.⁹ One study analyzed the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) database during the years 2002–2011 and showed that up to 35% of patients transplanted for NAFLD-related cirrhosis progressed to stage 3b-4 CKD within 2 years after liver transplantation, compared with 10% of patients transplanted for other etiologies.¹⁰ As NAFLD-related cirrhosis and HCC increase, the incidence of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation has increased remarkably in recent years.^11,12 NAFLD is an emerging risk factor for renal dysfunction, unlike other etiologies of cirrhosis. Early recognition and interventions for CKD among NAFLD patients to reduce the staggering cost of CKD and related hospitalizations is a global priority. Unfortunately, the impact of NAFLD on the risk of CKD is often unrecognized and requires further study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CKD in a unique cohort of Chinese individuals, who attend physical examination in a physical examination center and identify the association between NAFLD, especially in those with different comorbidities, and risk of CKD.

Methods

Study population

This was a single-center cross-sectional general population survey from a physical examination center in Beijing, China, between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Individuals above the age of 18 years who visited the center for annual physical examination were included. Individuals with a history of hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody positivity, excessive alcohol consumption (⩾30 g/day in men and ⩾20 g/day in women), drug-induced liver disease, decompensated liver cirrhosis, active malignancy, or had missing important clinical and laboratory data or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) were excluded from the analyses.

Sample size calculation and justification

Different sample sizes can be calculated based on the different prevalence of CKD. Here, the sample size was determined based on the overall prevalence of CKD in China.¹³ Using Formula: n = 4pq/d²; p = 10% that is, 0.1; q = 1–0.1 = 0.9; d = allowable error; d = 0.020; n = 4 ×0.1 ×0.9/0.02² = 900. Considering 15% of missing data or refusal, the justified sample size was 1035.

Data collection

The data were obtained from electronic medical records (EMRs), including demographic characteristics, past medical history, drug history, physical assessments (including weight, height, waist circumference, and sitting blood pressure), laboratory parameters, and liver ultrasonography.

A total of 3872 eligible individuals were included in the final data analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the data collection. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing (approval number: 2018-047-08).

Body mass index (BMI) is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Obesity was defined as a BMI of ⩾28 kg/m². Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of ⩾7.0 mmol/L or hemoglobin A1c ⩾ 6.5%, or prescription of antidiabetic drugs. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ⩾ 130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ⩾ 85 mmHg, or prescription of antihypertensive drugs. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program ATP III criteria as the presence of any three or more of the following metabolic conditions: (1) abdominal obesity, waist circumference ⩾ 102 cm in men and ⩾ 88 cm in women; (2) serum triglycerides (TG) ⩾ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; (3) serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) in men and < 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) in women or drug treatment for low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; (4) blood pressure ⩾ 130/85 mmHg or drug treatment for elevated blood pressure; (5) fasting plasma glucose ⩾ 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose.¹⁴

Diagnostic criteria of NAFLD

Fatty liver was defined using liver ultrasonography. Participants with other secondary causes of chronic liver disease were excluded, as described in the exclusion criteria. NAFLD was diagnosed based on evidence of fatty liver on ultrasonography.

The severity of liver fibrosis was assessed non-invasively using the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) score. The NFS was calculated as: −1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 × impaired fasting glucose/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio − 0.013 × platelet count (×10⁹ /L) – 0.66 × albumin (g/dL). The FIB-4 score was calculated according to the following formula: age × AST (IU/L) / [platelet count (×10⁹ /L) ×ALT (IU/L)^1/2]. The lower and upper cutoffs for NFS were −1.455 and 0.676, respectively, and those for FIB-4 were 1.3 and 2.67, respectively.¹⁵ A score below the lower cutoff was used to exclude advanced fibrosis, while a score above the upper cutoff was indicative of advanced fibrosis.

Assessment of chronic kidney disease

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation as follows: eGFR = 186 × [serum creatinine (mg/dL)]^−1.154× [age (years)]^−0.203 × (0.742 if female).¹⁶ CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and/or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ⩾ 3 mg/mmol.¹⁷ Stages of CKD were defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines: stage 1, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ⩾ 3 mg/mmol with eGFR ⩾ 90 mL/min/1.73 m²; stage 2, ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol with eGFR of 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m²; stage 3, eGFR of 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m² (with or without ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol); stage 4, eGFR of 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m²; and stage 5, eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m². Abnormal albuminuria was defined as ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol.¹⁷

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range, IQR), counts, or percentages (%) as appropriate. The normality of the samples was assessed using SPSS. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Q-Q plot were used for this analysis. Continuous data were compared using an independent Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test for groups without normal distributions. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Univariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard analysis to identify the independent parameters of CKD or ACR. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. In addition, stratified analyses to evaluate whether the association of NAFLD with CKD or NAFLD with ACR differed between subgroups defined by sex, age (<60 or ⩾ 60 years), DM, obesity (BMI < 28, ⩾28 kg/m²), hypertension, and MetS was performed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS (version 16.0; IBM, NY, USA), or R software (version 3.3.2; R Development Core Team, Austria).

Results

Clinical characteristics of the study population

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. There were 1967 subjects without NAFLD and 1905 subjects with NAFLD. The mean age was 60.0 years. The mean eGFR was 91.9 mL/min/1.73 m². The prevalence of NAFLD was 49.2%. Compared with subjects without NAFLD, those with NAFLD were more likely to be male, and have a higher BMI, longer waist, DM, hypertension, and MetS. Similarly, uric acid, urinary ACR, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and platelet count were significantly higher in subjects with NAFLD than in those without.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.

Characteristics	Overall(n = 3872)	Non-NAFLD(n = 1967)	NAFLD(n = 1905)	p value
Age (years)	60 ± 10	60 ± 11	60 ± 10	0.050
Male (%)	2958 (76.4)	1396 (71.0)	1562 (82.0)	<0.001
BMI (kg/m²)	25.6 ± 3.0	24.2 ± 2.6	27.0 ± 2.8	<0.001
Waist (cm)	88.1 ± 9.2	84.0 ± 8.3	92.4 ± 8.1	<0.001
Diabetes (%)	908 (23.5)	346 (17.6)	561 (29.4)	<0.001
Hypertension (%)	1889 (48.8)	796 (40.5)	1093 (57.4)	<0.001
Metabolic syndrome (%)	645 (16.7)	124 (6.3)	521 (27.3)	<0.001
BUN (mmol/L)	5.6 ± 1.4	5.6 ± 1.5	5.6 ± 1.4	0.423
Creatinine (μmol/L)	83.8 ± 21.2	83.3 ± 25.5	84.3 ± 15.3	0.122
Uric acid (μmol/L)	348.7 ± 76.8	337.7 ± 78.2	382.0 ± 80.7	<0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m)²	91.9 ± 16.5	91.9 ± 16.9	91.9 ± 16.0	0.858
Urinary ACR (mg/mmol)	0.53 (0.29,1.38)	0.48 (0.28,1.15)	0.58 (0.31,1.60)	<0.001
ALT (U/L)	24.0 (22.0, 28.0)	24.0 (22.0,27.0)	26.0 (22.0,30.0)	<0.001
AST (U/L)	18.0 (13.0,24.0)	16.0 (13.0,21.0)	22.0 (17.0,29.0)	<0.001
TBiL (μmol/L)	11.2 (8.8,14.6)	11.5 (9.0,15.1)	11.9 (9.3,15.3)	0.028
ALP (U/L)	66.0 (56.0,77.5)	66.0 (55.0,77.0)	68.0 (58.0,81.0)	<0.001
GGT (U/L)	25.0 (18.0,37.0)	20.0 (15.0,29.0)	30.0 (22.0,44.0)	<0.001
LDH (U/L)	177.0 (159.0,196.0)	181.0 (168.0,186.0)	178.0 (161.0,197.0)	0.528
Albumin (g/L)	45.4 ± 2.4	45.2 ± 2.4	45.7 ± 2.4	<0.001
HbA1c (%)	6.05 ± 0.83	5.93 ± 0.72	6.18 ± 0.90	<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)	5.64 ± 1.41	5.37 ± 1.23	5.92 ± 1.52	<0.001
TC (mmol/L)	4.55 ± 0.93	4.49 ± 0.89	4.53 ± 0.93	0.228
TG (mmol/L)	1.33 (0.96,1.87)	1.09 (0.82,1.47)	1.63 (1.22,2.26)	<0.001
HDL-C (mmol/L)	1.34 ± 0.37	1.46 ± 0.39	1.22 ± 0.29	<0.001
LDL-C (mmol/L)	2.96 ± 0.85	2.95 ± 0.83	2.97 ± 0.86	0.414
Platelet count (*10⁹/L)	228.7 ± 51.1	226.0 ± 53.6	231.6 ± 53.4	<0.001

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FPG, fast plasma glucose; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein- cholesterol; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; TbiL, total bilirubin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; URINARY ACR, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio.

NAFLD and the prevalence of CKD or the presence of abnormal albuminuria

The prevalence of CKD and the presence of abnormal albuminuria are shown in Figure 1. The prevalence of CKD was higher in subjects with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD (15.8% vs 11.9%, p < 0.001). In addition, compared with non-NAFLD subjects, the prevalence of CKD was significantly higher in NAFLD with DM, hypertension, and MetS (25.5%, 21.0%, and 25.0%, respectively; all p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of CKD between NAFLD with obesity and NAFLD subjects (15.8% vs 19.1%, p = 0.068). Similarly, the presence of abnormal albuminuria was higher in subjects with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD (11.0% vs 14.8%, p < 0.001). Compared with non-NAFLD subjects, the presence of abnormal albuminuria was significantly higher in NAFLD with DM, hypertension, and MetS (23.5%, 19.3%, and 23.2%, respectively; all p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the presence of abnormal albuminuria between NAFLD with obesity and NAFLD subjects (14.8% vs 18.0%, p = 0.081). Subjects with NAFLD and DM had the highest prevalence of both CKD and abnormal albuminuria among subjects with NAFLD and comorbidities.

Figure 1.

Comparison of prevalence of CKD (panel a) and presence of abnormal albuminuria (panel b) between subjects with non-NAFLD, NAFLD, and NAFLD with difference comorbidities.

Different groups of subjects with NAFLD and CKD stages or abnormal albuminuria

The comparisons of CKD stage and abnormal albuminuria between the non-NAFLD group and different groups of subjects with NAFLD are illustrated in Table 2. The stages of CKD and abnormal albuminuria were significantly different between subjects with and without NAFLD. The NAFLD population was more likely to have CKD 3–5 stage and levels of abnormal albuminuria. In particular, the more advanced CKD stage and increased rate of abnormal albuminuria were more likely to be observed in NAFLD subjects older than 60 years of age, with DM, obesity, hypertension, and MetS.

Table 2.

Comparison of CKD stages and abnormal albuminuria between different groups of subjects with NAFLD.¹⁷

Characteristics	CKD stages			ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol (%)
Characteristics	No CKD	CKD 1–2	CKD 3–5	ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol (%)
Non-NAFLD	1733 (88.1)	192 (9.8)	42 (2.1)	217 (11.0)
NAFLD	1604 (84.2)	263 (13.8)	38 (2.0)	281 (14.8)
p value	<0.001			<0.001
NAFLD (Male)	1326 (84.9)	203 (13.0)	33 (2.1)	220 (14.1)
NAFLD (Female)	278 (81.0)	60 (17.5)	5 (1.5)	61 (17.8)
p value	0.074			0.080
NAFLD (age < 60)	820 (88.5)	103 (11.1)	4 (0.4)	105 (11.3)
NAFLD (age ⩾ 60)	784 (80.2)	160 (16.4)	34 (3.4)	176 (18.0)
p value	<0.001			<0.001
NAFLD without DM	1186 (88.2)	142 (10.6)	16 (1.2)	149 (11.1)
NAFLD with DM	418 (74.5)	121 (21.6)	22 (3.9)	132 (23.5)
p value	<0.001			<0.001
NAFLD without obesity	1160 (85.5)	173 (12.8)	23 (1.7)	182 (13.4)
NAFLD with obesity	444 (80.9)	90 (16.4)	15 (3.7)	99 (18.0)
p value	0.032			0.010
NAFLD without hypertension	740 (91.1)	70 (8.6)	2 (0.3)	70 (8.6)
NAFLD with hypertension	864 (79.0)	193 (17.7)	36 (3.3)	211 (19.3)
p value	<0.001			<0.001
NAFLD without metabolic syndrome	1213 (87.6)	152 (11.0)	19 (1.4)	160 (11.6)
NAFLD with metabolic syndrome	391 (75.1)	111 (21.3)	19 (3.6)	121 (23.2)
p value	<0.001			<0.001

ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Risk of prevalent CKD and abnormal albuminuria according to logistic regression analysis

Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to further understand the association between NAFLD and kidney damage. As shown in Table 3, the unadjusted OR for prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 1 was 1.39 (95% CI = 1.16–1.67). After adjustment for age and sex, the OR for prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 1 was 1.46 (95% CI = 1.21–1.76). After adjustment for age, sex, and DM, the OR for prevalent of CKD stage ⩾ 1 remained statistically significant (all p < 0.05). Similarly, there was a significant association between NAFLD and albuminuria. Notably, after adjustment for age, sex, and DM, the OR for the presence of abnormal albuminuria remained statistically significant (all p < 0.05). Conversely, for prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 3, no significant association was observed. Compared with NAFLD subjects without comorbidities, those with NAFLD and age more than 60 years, with DM, obesity, hypertension, and MetS had a higher prevalence of CKD stage ⩾ 1 and increased urinary albumin excretion (all p < 0.05). Similarly, NAFLD subjects older than 60 years of age, with DM, hypertension, and MetS had a higher prevalence of CKD stage ⩾ 3 (all p < 0.05).

Table 3.

Associations of NAFLD and NAFLD with comorbidities with CKD (defined as either CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3) and abnormal albuminuria (defined as ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol).¹⁷

Variables	CKD ⩾ 1		CKD ⩾ 3		ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol
Variables	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
NAFLD	1.39 (1.16–1.67)	<0.001	1.07 (0.69–1.67)	0.759	1.40 (1.15–1.69)	0.001
NAFLD (adjusted for age, sex)	1.46 (1.21–1.76)	<0.001	1.06 (0.67–1.67)	0.798	1.45 (1.20–1.76)	<0.001
NAFLD (adjusted for age, sex, DM)	1.31 (1.08–1.58)	0.006	0.98 (0.62–1.55)	0.937	1.30 (1.07–1.58)	0.010
Sex
NAFLD (Male)	1.31 (0.97–1.78)	0.078	1.46 (0.57–3.77)	0.435	1.32 (0.97–1.80)	0.081
NAFLD (Female)	Reference
Age
NAFLD (age ⩾ 60)	1.90 (1.47–2.45)	<0.001	8.31 (2.94–23.51)	<0.001	1.72 (1.32–2.23)	<0.001
NAFLD (age < 60)	Reference
DM
NAFLD with DM	2.57 (2.00–3.31)	<0.001	3.39 (1.77–6.50)	<0.001	2.47 (1.91–3.20)	<0.001
NAFLD without DM	Reference
Obesity
NAFLD with obesity	1.40 (1.08–1.82)	0.012	1.63 (0.84–3.14)	0.147	1.42 (1.09–1.86)	0.010
NAFLD without obesity	Reference
Hypertension
NAFLD with hypertension	2.72 (2.05–3.61)	<0.001	13.79 (3.31–57.45)	<0.001	2.54 (1.90–3.38)	<0.001
NAFLD without hypertension	Reference
Metabolic syndrome
NAFLD with MetS	2.36 (1.83–3.04)	<0.001	2.72 (1.43–5.18)	0.002	2.31 (1.78–3.01)	0.001
NAFLD without MetS	Reference

ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetic mellitus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; MetS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratios.

Subgroup analysis of NAFLD with increased prevalence of CKD and presence of abnormal albuminuria

As shown in Figures 2 and 3, the association between NAFLD and CKD or abnormal albuminuria was evaluated in different subgroups. A positive association between NAFLD and CKD or abnormal albuminuria was consistent in different subgroups, except for sex subgroups (all p values for interaction > 0.10).

Figure 2.

Odds ratios for prevalent CKD comparing participants with NAFLD with those without NAFLD in different subgroups.

Figure 3.

Odds ratios for abnormal albuminuria (increased ACR) comparing participants with NAFLD with those without NAFLD in different subgroups.

NAFLD severity and risk of prevalent CKD and presence of abnormal albuminuria

As shown in Figure 4, the prevalence of CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3 and the presence of abnormal albuminuria gradually increased in accordance with the severity of NAFLD.

Figure 4.

Comparison of prevalence of CKD (panel a, c) and presence of abnormal albuminuria (panel b, d) between subjects with NAFLD and those without NAFLD stratified by NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and Fibrosis 4 score (FIB-4).

As shown in Table 4, the unadjusted ORs of prevalent of CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3 or abnormal albuminuria for NAFLD severity assessed by NFS or FIB-4 scores were statistically significant (all p < 0.05). After adjustment for age and sex, the ORs for prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3 or abnormal albuminuria for NAFLD severity assessed by NFS or FIB-4 scores were almost statistically significant (all p < 0.05, except the prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 3 for NAFLD severity assessed by FIB-4 scores). After adjustment for age, sex, and DM, the ORs for prevalent of CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3 or abnormal albuminuria for NAFLD severity assessed by NFS were almost statistically significant (all p < 0.05), only the prevalent of CKD stage ⩾ 1 for NAFLD severity assessed by FIB-4 scores remained statistically significant (p = 0.026). Univariable logistic regression analyses stratified by the severity of NAFLD were performed to further understand the association between NAFLD and kidney damage. The ORs of prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 1 for increasing levels of NFS were 1.00 (reference), 2.14 (1.65–2.77), and 2.49 (1.76–3.54). Similarly, the ORs of prevalent CKD stage ⩾ 1 for increasing FIB-4 score were 1.00 (reference), 1.36 (1.05–1.76), and 1.46 (1.08–1.98). The ORs of prevalent of CKD stage ⩾ 3 or abnormal albuminuria for NAFLD severity regardless of NFS or FIB-4 scores showed similar trends.

Table 4.

Associations of NAFLD severity (stratified by NFS scores and FIB-4 scores) with CKD (defined as either CKD stage ⩾ 1 or CKD stage ⩾ 3) and abnormal albuminuria (defined as ACR ⩾ 3 mg/mmol).¹⁷

Variables	CKD ⩾ 1		CKD ⩾ 3		ACR ⩾ 3mg/mmol
Variables	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
NFS scores	2.25 (1.78–2.83)	<0.001	3.96 (2.18–7.21)	<0.001	2.12 (1.68–2.68)	<0.001
NFS scores (adjusted for age, sex)	1.41 (1.24–1.61)	<0.001	1.73 (1.21–2.47)	0.003	1.40 (1.23–1.60)	<0.001
NFS scores (adjusted for age, sex, DM)	1.22 (1.06–1.41)	0.007	1.54 (1.03–2.30)	0.034	1.21 (1.05–1.41)	0.011
NFS category
NFS < −1.455	Reference
−1.455 ⩽ NFS < 0.676	2.14 (1.65–2.77)	<0.001	2.585 (1.22–5.49)	0.013	2.11 (1.62–2.75)	<0.001
NFS ⩾ 0.676	2.49 (1.76–3.54)	<0.001	4.533 (2.65–7.77)	<0.001	2.15 (1.49–3.09)	<0.001
FIB-4 scores	1.40 (1.13–1.73)	0.002	1.813 (1.08–3.05)	0.025	1.31 (1.05–1.63)	0.018
FIB-4 scores (adjusted for age, sex)	1.29 (1.07–1.56)	0.007	1.24 (0.81–1.90)	0.313	1.27 (1.05–1.53)	0.016
FIB-4 scores (adjusted for age, sex, DM)	1.24 (1.03–1.50)	0.026	1.20 (0.78–1.84)	0.41	1.21 (0.99,1.48)	0.051
FIB-4 category
FIB-4 < 1.3	Reference
1.3 ⩽ FIB-4 < 2.67	1.36 (1.05–1.76)	0.020	2.06 (1.06–3.99)	0.032	1.27 (0.97–1.66)	0.077
FIB-4 ⩾ 2.67	1.46 (1.08–1.98)	0.015	1.57 (0.75–3.31)	0.235	1.36 (0.99–1.88)	0.057

ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetic mellitus; FIB-4, fibrosis 4 score; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score; OR, odds ratios.

Discussion

This study suggested that the prevalence of NAFLD was 49.2% among the general population in Beijing, China. The prevalence of CKD and abnormal albuminuria was higher in individuals with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD. The comorbidities of NAFLD, including DM, hypertension, and MetS, increased the risk of CKD and abnormal albuminuria. The prevalence of CKD and abnormal albuminuria were significantly different in subgroup analyses stratified by age and subgroups of individuals with and without the presence of comorbidities such as DM, obesity, hypertension, and MetS. NAFLD was associated with a moderately increased risk of CKD and abnormal albuminuria, independently of traditional cardiometabolic risk factors. In addition, a greater severity of NAFLD was strongly associated with a higher risk of CKD and abnormal albuminuria. To our knowledge, this is the first cross-sectional study to investigate the association between NAFLD and CKD or abnormal albuminuria, and to analyze the association between the severity of NAFLD and CKD or abnormal albuminuria based on a health checkup of a population from Beijing, China.

Several large cross-sectional and case-control studies have reported that the prevalence of CKD in patients with NAFLD is between 4% and 42%.^18–23 A cross-sectional analysis of 37,825 cases from health checkup centers in Taiwan showed that the percentage of CKD was 17.5% in individuals with NAFLD and a significantly positive association between moderate to severe NAFLD and CKD even after adjustment for potential confounders such as age, sex, smoking, components of MetS, and the ALT level.²⁴ Their results were similar to those of our study. Another important observation of our study was that NAFLD remained a risk factor for CKD regardless of age, sex, and DM. The results of subgroup analysis confirmed that NAFLD was positively related to CKD even in female, younger individuals, and patients without comorbidities, suggesting that more attention should be paid to renal impairment in patients with NAFLD.

A previous meta-analysis of 11 longitudinal studies (involving a total of 28680 individuals) reported that NAFLD was associated with an almost 80% increased risk of incident CKD [random-effects hazard ratio (HR) = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.65–1.95].²⁵ An updated meta-analysis that incorporated nine observational studies with 96,595 adult individuals (34.1% with NAFLD) found that NAFLD was associated with an increased incidence of CKD (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.20–1.53) and patients with more advanced NAFLD or fibrosis were more likely to develop incident CKD (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.25–1.74).²⁶ Another largest and most updated meta-analysis of 13 studies with 1,222,032 individuals (28.1% with NAFLD) and 33,840 cases of incident CKD stage ⩾ 3 over a median follow-up of 9.7 years indicated that NAFLD is significantly associated with ~1.45-fold increased long-term risk of incident CKD stage ⩾ 3, and the risk seems to parallel the severity of NAFLD, especially the severity of liver fibrosis.⁸ To date, convincing evidence suggests that NAFLD could be a driving force for the development and progression of CKD.

In our study, the prevalence of NAFLD with obesity or DM was 28.8% and 29.4%, respectively. Obesity, a component of MetS, is the most common risk factor for NAFLD and an independent risk factor for CKD. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of CKD. Patients with NAFLD commonly develop DM. Targher et al.²¹ reported that in NAFLD patients with DM, the prevalence of CKD reached 40%. A previous study showed that metabolic abnormality was associated with a significantly increased risk of CKD progression.²⁷ In this study, we also found that individuals with NAFLD and coexisting MetS had a higher prevalence of CKD and abnormal albuminuria. Our study benefits from understanding the implications of both NAFLD and traditional risk factors for CKD. CKD shares similar risk factors with NAFLD, such as increasing age, obesity, hypertension, DM, and MetS. The relationship between NAFLD and CKD is complex and has not been definitively demonstrated. Three observational cohort studies have reported the influence of NAFLD on the risk of all-cause mortality, incidence of non-fatal cardiovascular events (CVEs), or progression of kidney disease within the CKD population.^9,28,29 Only one study showed a strong association between NAFLD and non-fatal CVEs in patients with CKD.²⁸ The results were conflicting for all-cause mortality and progression of renal disease. Additional larger prospective studies are needed to further examine this association.

Some studies have further analyzed the possible pathophysiological mechanisms by which NAFLD may contribute to the development and progression of CKD. Accumulating evidence suggests that NAFLD (especially with advanced fibrosis) exacerbates hepatic insulin resistance, promotes atherogenic dyslipidemia, induces hypertension, and causes the release of multiple proinflammatory cytokines and hepatokines that may contribute to the development and progression of CKD.^7,30,31 Adipose tissue has an endocrine function and can secrete many biologically active adipokines. These cytokines affect the metabolism of adipose tissue and the entire body of the organism. Several studies have reported the potential role of adipokines and other inflammatory mediators in the etiopathogenesis of both NAFLD and CKD. Higher levels of circulating leptin have been found to be associated with increased severity of NAFLD and contribute to the development and progression of CKD.^32,33 Adiponectin enhances glucose and fatty acid oxidation, improves insulin sensitivity, attenuates plaque formation, and increases aldosterone production.³⁴ Decreased adiponectin levels are inversely related to the severity of steatosis, necroinflammation, and fibrosis.^35,36 Similarly, decreased adiponectin levels were also associated with a higher risk of end-stage renal disease independent of conventional risk factors, BMI, and metabolic syndrome.³⁷

Therapeutic interventions for the treatment of both NAFLD and CKD are currently under investigation, and shared common risk factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation, and underlying pathophysiology suggest that medications and behavioral modifications may be applicable to both diseases. Lifestyle interventions, including exercise, weight loss, and bariatric surgery, can decrease hepatic fat content and inflammation, result in regression of fibrosis, and also have beneficial effects on renal functions, which are associated with improvements in glomerular hemodynamics.^38,39 A recent cross-sectional study determined that CKD-NAFLD patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) had a lower degree of liver stiffness than patients not on medications.⁴⁰ Some NAFLD studies suggest that ARBs can attenuate steatosis, insulin resistance, inflammation, necroinflammation, NAFLD activity score, fibrosis stage in NASH, and microalbuminuria.^41–43 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are all incretin mimetics, which have a potential role in improving NASH and CKD through multiple mechanisms.⁴⁴ Both GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 demonstrated nephroprotection in diabetic nephropathy.^45,46 Recent clinical trials reported that liraglutide induced significant weight loss and NASH resolution and improved markers of lipotoxicity, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction.⁴⁷ However, sitagliptin did not induce weight loss or improved radiological and biochemical markers of steatosis, liver fibrosis, and insulin resistance in diabetic NAFLD patients.⁴⁸ Given the disease burden imposed by NAFLD and CKD worldwide, it is necessary to identify NAFLD patients with higher risk of incident CKD to prevent early renal damage. Further research is needed to clearly illustrate the mechanism and provide effective treatment for liver and kidney disease in NASH-related CKD.

There are several limitations to our study that need to be noted. First, this is a cross-sectional design; in comparison with a longitudinal design, cross-sectional study is more prone to bias. Furthermore, our findings determined simple associations between NAFLD and CKD, which are inherently inapt to establish a clear causal or consequential nexus. Further intensive studies remain to be conducted to determine the precise relationship between the two. Second, the study population only included Chinese individuals who underwent annual physical examinations at the outpatient clinic. This population might not be representative of other ethnic groups and inpatients. Third, only liver ultrasonography (US) was used to diagnose the fatty liver. It is well known that US can miss milder fatty liver (<25%). However, the overdiagnosis of fatty liver on ultrasound is not common. Liver biopsy is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of NAFLD or NASH with liver fibrosis. Our population was physically examined, considering the risks and costs associated with liver biopsy or other non-invasive assessments such as Fibroscan or MRE (magnetic resonance elastography) and their inappropriateness for widespread use. NFS and FIB-4 score were used instead to assess liver fibrosis in this study. These scores were mainly designed to rule out advanced fibrosis and are not specifically useful for assessing liver fibrosis. In addition, our study enrolled individuals with different BMI statuses, and a recent study⁴⁹ that analyzed several non-invasive NAFLD markers including NFS, concluded that their reliability depends on BMI status. The non-invasive markers used to evaluate liver fibrosis in clinical practice should be further explored. Despite these limitations, the results of this study are important in raising awareness of CKD among Chinese individuals with NAFLD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, NAFLD was associated with a higher prevalence of CKD regardless of traditional risk factors, and the severity of NAFLD assessed by non-invasive methods was also positively associated with the prevalence of CKD. Our findings suggest that NAFLD with comorbidities may be associated with a higher risk of CKD and abnormal albuminuria. It is recommended that patients with NAFLD, especially those with coexisting comorbidities, should be carefully accessed for the development of CKD. Future studies should focus on the mechanisms and therapeutic targets for both NAFLD and CKD in a comorbid setting.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Ying Cao and You Deng contributed equally to this work. We thank all physicians who participated in the management of the subjects included in this study.

Author contributions

Wen Xie conceived and designed the study; Ying Cao, You Deng, Jingjing Wang, and Jingyu Zhang collected the data; Ying Cao and You Ddeng carried out the statistical analysis, discussed the results, and drafted the first manuscript. Hong Zhao and Wen Xie discussed the results and revised the manuscript. Wen Xie supervised the data collection and interpreted the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project (81600454), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770577), and the Clinical Medicine Development Project of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals (ZYLX201828).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Wen Xie

References

Younossi

Anstee

Marietti

, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15: 11–20.

Younossi

Koenig

Abdelatif

, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016; 64: 73–84.

Chalasani

Younossi

Lavine

, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018; 67: 328–357.

Wattacheril

Extrahepatic manifestations of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2020; 49: 141–149.

van der Velde

Matsushita

Coresh

, et al. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. A collaborative meta-analysis of high-risk population cohorts. Kidney Int 2011; 79: 1341–1352.

Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2020; 395: 709–733.

Byrne

Targher

NAFLD as a driver of chronic kidney disease. J Hepatol 2020; 72: 785–801.

Mantovani

Petracca

Beatrice

, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident chronic kidney disease: an updated meta-analysis. Gut. Epub ahead of print 10 December 2020. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323082.

Paik

Golabi

Younoszai

, et al. Chronic kidney disease is independently associated with increased mortality in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int 2019; 39: 342–352.

10.

Singal

Salameh

Kuo

, et al. Evolving frequency and outcomes of simultaneous liver kidney transplants based on liver disease etiology. Transplantation 2014; 98: 216–221.

11.

Singal

Hasanin

Kaif

, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for simultaneous liver kidney transplantation in the United States. Transplantation 2016; 100: 607–612.

12.

Huang

El-Serag

Loomba

Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 18: 223–238.

13.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012; 379: 815–822.

14.

Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143–3421.

15.

Wong

Adams

de Lédinghen

, et al. Noninvasive biomarkers in NAFLD and NASH—current progress and future promise. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15: 461–478.

16.

Levey

Bosch

Lewis

, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461–470.

17.

Levey

Eckardt

Tsukamoto

, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67: 2089–2100.

18.

Chang

Ryu

Sung

, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease predicts chronic kidney disease in nonhypertensive and nondiabetic Korean men. Metabolism 2008; 57: 569–576.

19.

Targher

Bertolini

Rodella

, et al. Relationship between kidney function and liver histology in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2166–2171.

20.

Yilmaz

Alahdab

Yonal

, et al. Microalbuminuria in nondiabetic patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: association with liver fibrosis. Metabolism 2010; 59: 1327–1330.

21.

Targher

Pichiri

Zoppini

, et al. Increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver. Diabet Med 2012; 29: 220–226.

22.

Sirota

McFann

Targher

, et al. Association between nonalcoholic liver disease and chronic kidney disease: an ultrasound analysis from NHANES 1988-1994. Am J Nephrol 2012; 36: 466–471.

23.

Sun

Lin

, et al. Fatty liver index, albuminuria and the association with chronic kidney disease: a population-based study in China. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e019097.

24.

Liu

Kuo

KL.

Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver and chronic kidney disease: an analysis of 37,825 cases from health checkup center in Taiwan. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020; 32: 65–69.

25.

Musso

Gambino

Tabibian

, et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001680.

26.

Mantovani

Zaza

Byrne

, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk of incident chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 2018; 79: 64–76.

27.

Yun

Kim

Park

, et al. Obesity, metabolic abnormality, and progression of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72: 400–410.

28.

Chinnadurai

Ritchie

Green

, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and clinical outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; 34: 449–457.

29.

Jang

Kang

Sinn

, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease accelerates kidney function decline in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cohort study. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 4718.

30.

Targher

Byrne

CD.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an emerging driving force in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2017; 13: 297–310.

31.

Francque

van der Graaff

Kwanten

WJ.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk: pathophysiological mechanisms and implications. J Hepatol 2016; 65: 425–443.

32.

Polyzos

Aronis

Kountouras

, et al. Circulating leptin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2016; 59: 30–43.

33.

Tesauro

Mascali

Franzese

, et al. Chronic kidney disease, obesity, and hypertension: the role of leptin and adiponectin. Int J Hypertens 2012; 2012: 943605.

34.

Shabani

Emamgholipour

Doosti

CTRP1 in liver disease. Adv Clin Chem 2017; 79: 1–23.

35.

Balmer

Joneli

Schoepfer

, et al. Significance of serum adiponectin levels in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Sci 2010; 119: 431–436.

36.

Silva

Colombo

Schiavon

LL.

Adiponectin: a multitasking player in the field of liver diseases. Diabetes Metab 2014; 40: 95–107.

37.

Kuo

Lin

, et al. The association of adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and clinical outcome in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2019; 14: e0220158.

38.

Docherty

le Roux

CW.

Bariatric surgery for the treatment of chronic kidney disease in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020; 16: 709–720.

39.

Lassailly

Caiazzo

Ntandja-Wandji

, et al. Bariatric surgery provides long-term resolution of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and regression of fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 1290–1301.e5.

40.

Orlic

Mikolasevic

Lukenda

, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the renin-angiotensin system blockers in the patients with chronic kidney disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2015; 127: 355–362.

41.

Musso

Cassader

Cohney

, et al. Emerging liver-kidney interactions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Trends Mol Med 2015; 21: 645–662.

42.

Hirata

Tomita

Kawai

, et al. Effect of telmisartan or losartan for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Fatty Liver Protection Trial by Telmisartan or Losartan Study (FANTASY). Int J Endocrinol 2013; 2013: 587140.

43.

Musso

De Michieli

Bongiovanni

, et al. New pharmacologic agents that target inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related kidney disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 972–985.

44.

Musso

Cassader

Cohney

, et al. Fatty liver and chronic kidney disease: novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 1830–1845.

45.

Imamura

Hirai

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, attenuates the progression of overt diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Tohoku J Exp Med 2013; 231: 57–61.

46.

Groop

Cooper

Perkovic

, et al. Linagliptin lowers albuminuria on top of recommended standard treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal dysfunction. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 3460–3468.

47.

Armstrong

Hull

Guo

, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 decreases lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol 2016; 64: 399–408.

48.

Cui

Philo

Nguyen

, et al. Sitagliptin vs. placebo for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol 2016; 65: 369–376.

49.

Jimenez

Marques

Gestic

, et al. Non-invasive markers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: reliability is variable according to BMI status. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 3888–3892.

The association between NAFLD and risk of chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Objective:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study population

Sample size calculation and justification

Data collection

Diagnostic criteria of NAFLD

Assessment of chronic kidney disease

Statistical analysis

Results

Clinical characteristics of the study population

NAFLD and the prevalence of CKD or the presence of abnormal albuminuria

Different groups of subjects with NAFLD and CKD stages or abnormal albuminuria

Risk of prevalent CKD and abnormal albuminuria according to logistic regression analysis

Subgroup analysis of NAFLD with increased prevalence of CKD and presence of abnormal albuminuria

NAFLD severity and risk of prevalent CKD and presence of abnormal albuminuria

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

ORCID iD

References