Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background and aims

Majority of elective orthopaedic operations are postponed to accommodate the reallocation of healthcare resources to combat the pandemic. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the mental state of orthopaedic patients amidst limited orthopaedic management options. The secondary aim of this paper is to identify areas of significant stressors and to provide avenues for improvements.

Methods

A survey was administered on patients in outpatient clinics within a tertiary institution from 31 May to 13 June 2021 where government interventions prevented elective orthopaedic surgeries from being performed. Individuals' fatigue level were assessed with Chalder fatigue scale (CFS) and they were surveyed on their areas of stressors.

Results

A total of 160 orthopaedic patients (67 males and 93 females) were surveyed with an average age of 48.3 years old (range 17–88). 65 out of 160 (40.6%) were deemed to be severely fatigued (CFS > 4) with a higher prevalence amongst females than males (47.3% vs 31.3% respectively.) The top three areas identified as stressors included transmitting to family/friends, travel restrictions/quarantine orders and limitation on recreational/social activities (67.5%, 45.6% and 57.5% respectively). 25.6% of the patients indicated that the increased difficulty in accessing healthcare was a stress factor.

Discussion and conclusion

There is a high proportion of severe fatigue amongst orthopaedic patients. Combined with postponement of orthopaedic care and treatment, the detrimental effects of a prolong pandemic can be more pronounced on orthopaedic patients. Identified areas of stressors provide avenues for improvements to safeguard the mental health of orthopaedic patients.

Keywords

Orthopaedic pandemic covid-19 mental health severe fatigue

Introduction

Just as high rates of vaccines for the COVID-19 virus were administered, more contagious new strains of the virus such as the Delta and Omicron strain has hindered our progress to normality by fuelling the majority of new transmissions.¹ Moreover, the newer strains are much more contagious as compared to the Alpha strain,² leading to larger waves of infection which can further compromise the healthcare system. The unprecedented prolonged fight during a pandemic triggers a phenomenon known as pandemic fatigue which can negatively affect individual’s emotional well-being, leading to emotional burnout and fatigue.^3,4 Furthermore, To cope with the increasing strain of healthcare resources, government institutions and healthcare bodies have pre-emptively reduced elective caseloads to allow for diversion of manpower towards acute care.⁵ As such, elective surgeries for non-acute orthopaedic conditions such as osteoarthritis or sports injuries were repeatedly postponed despite having significant debilitating effects on an individual’s quality of life.

The combination of delayed orthopaedic surgical interventions and unfavourable mental health environment during a prolonged pandemic will have detrimental effects on the management of elective orthopaedic conditions and fatigue levels of orthopaedic patients. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends identifying and surveying populations that are at risk of emotional burntout and fatigue as one of their cornerstone strategies.⁶ Hence, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the current mental state of orthopaedic patients amidst the pandemic where management of orthopaedic conditions are significantly restricted. The secondary aim of this paper is to identify areas of significant stressors that can adversely affect the mental wellbeing of the patients and to provide avenues for improvements.

Methods

Data collection

This is a cross sectional study which involves a survey administered to orthopaedic patients. Orthopaedic patients were surveyed in outpatient orthopaedic clinics within a tertiary institution which has high volumes of patients daily. The period of study was from 31 May 2021 to 13 June 2021 which corresponds to the second half of Singapore’s ‘’Phase 2 heightened-alert’’. Within the tertiary healthcare institution, only infection, oncological, trauma or urgent spine surgeries were allowed to proceed. Elective cases such as joint replacement for osteoarthritis and ligamentous repair or reconstruction for sports injury were not permitted and repeatedly postponed. Orthopaedic patients were still allowed to attend their outpatient specialist appointments but there was a significant restriction on the number of patients per session.

Additional measures put in place by the government included social restrictions such as working from home as the default working arrangement, no dining in was allowed, social gatherings of no more than two individuals in public spaces or two unique visitors per day per household.

An Institutional Board waiver was obtained for this study.

Participants and recruitment

The study population included patients that presented to our outpatient orthopaedic specialist clinics. Patients were offered the opportunity to complete the survey in English or Chinese whilst waiting for their appointment or after their appointment. If the patient was unable to read, the clinic staff or the accompanying caregiver would assist with verbal translation. The entire recruitment process was on a voluntary basis. The survey was answered without any interference from the study administrator. The study administrators were not directly involved in the care of these patients. Individuals were allowed to leave out answers to questions where they were not comfortable with answering.

Variables

Basic demographics such as age, gender and occupation were recorded. No participant identifiers such as name and national identification number were captured. The survey comprised of 2 sections:

In the first section, Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS) was selected to evaluate for the presence of emotional burnout and fatigue in orthopaedic patients. CFS is a self-administered questionnaire that evaluates for the presence of severe fatigue in an individual. It can also be used as a surrogate for mental health well-being due to their strong correlation.⁷ It consists of 11 questions where responders answered either ‘’more than usual’’ or ‘’less than or normal’’.⁸

The second section aimed to identify areas that contribute to orthopaedic patient’s stress levels, which included self-infection, transmission to friends/family, increased difficulty in healthcare access, loss of job/financial strain, disrupted work schedule, difficulty in family arrangement, travel restrictions/quarantine orders, limitation on recreational and social activities. Patients were provided all the options of areas of stressors, and to select the options that they associate with.

Mann U Whitney test was used for statistical analysis and was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp)

Results

A total of 160 orthopaedic patients (67 males and 93 females) were surveyed with an average age of 48.3 years old (range 17–88). 65 out of 160 (40.6%) were deemed to be severely fatigued (CFS > 4)⁸ with a higher prevalence amongst females than males (47.3% vs 31.3% respectively.) The top 3 areas that were affected more than usual were ‘Need to rest more’, ‘Tiredness’ and ‘Lack of energy’ (44.8%, 40.1% and 37.2% respectively). Table 1

The top three areas identified as stressors included transmitting to family/friends, travel restrictions/quarantine orders and limitation on recreational/social activities (67.5%, 45.6% and 57.5% respectively). 25.6% of the patients indicated that the increased difficulty in accessing healthcare was a stress factor as well. Table 2

Discussion

Our survey showed that 40.6% of orthopaedic patients were found to be severely fatigued with an overall CFS score of 4 or more. The top stressors identified were transmitting to family/friends, limitation on recreational/social activities, and travel restrictions/quarantine orders (67.5%, 45.6% and 57.5% respectively)

Within our study, higher number of patients indicated that they felt more tired than usual, lack of energy and needing to rest more than usual, as compared to other areas within the CFS. Existing literature has described increasing levels of fatigue and psychological symptoms during a prolonged pandemic due to social isolation and increased stressors.^9–11 It is well established that fatigue and pain often co-exist and the most frequent presenting complain for orthopaedic patients is pain.^12,13 Furthermore, severe fatigue is a clinically significant predictor for adverse outcomes in orthopaedic conditions such as lower back pain and osteoarthritis.¹⁴ Patients with severe fatigue are more likely to have severe pain as severe fatigue itself have been hypothesized to intensify the pain sensation experienced,^15,16 further complicating symptomatic indications for orthopaedic interventions. A study found that patients with high fatigue severity were more likely to have pain recur after surgical interventions such as total knee replacement,¹⁷ potentially affecting patient reported outcome measures.

To accommodate reallocation of hospital resources for combatting the pandemic, elective orthopaedic surgeries around the world have been postponed or cancelled, including our study institution.^18,19 Many countries in the world, including Singapore, have experienced repeated waves of infection which resulted in repeated postponement of elective surgeries. Despite their elective nature, orthopaedic procedures such as total knee replacements are associated with improvement in quality of life scores and reduced fatigue levels 6 months postoperatively. Delays in these procedures can prolong the duration of severe fatigue and negatively impact patient’s quality of life scores.²⁰ Knebel et al. found that cancellation of elective orthopaedic surgery during this pandemic lead to higher pain levels experienced and analgesia consumption as compared to when their surgeries were scheduled.²¹ To address this issue, orthopaedic surgeons around the world are increasingly reverting to and recommending conservative management such as physiotherapy for elective conditions.^22,23 However, increased fatigue levels are known to decrease adherence to physiotherapy and can undermine the efficacy of conservative management.^24,25 Hence, severe fatigue has a multifaceted impact on the outcomes of orthopaedic conditions. The combination of increased fatigue and postponement of surgeries will likely complicate the management of elective orthopaedic conditions and have detrimental effects on their outcomes.

Top three areas of stressors identified by this survey are transmitting to family/friends, limitation on recreational/social activities, and travel restrictions/quarantine orders. The top area of stressor identified by orthopaedic patients in our study is transmission to family/friends, which is further echoed by another cross sectional survey performed in the US which also showed that transmission of the virus to their family members was a significant stressor.²⁶ Vaccinations can reduce transmission and severity of COVID-19 infection and therefore, alleviate the worries of transmission to friends’/family. During orthopaedic outpatient appointments, clinicians can consider checking on a patient’s vaccination status, addressing their vaccination concerns and to actively encourage them to participate in the vaccination drive.

The other two areas of stressors relates to the ability of individuals to pursue social and recreational activities. In a bid to control the virus spread, governments around the world imposed social restrictions which leads to isolation at home and decreased rates of physical activities. It is well established that increased physical activity is associated with lower pain levels and the sedentary lifestyle from social isolation can increase pain sensitivity.^27–30 The decrease in physical activity level is likely to aggravate pain levels in orthopaedic patients, which is further worsened by the uncertain availability of surgical interventions. Extra effort should be taken to enable patients to remain physically active, whilst respecting government interventions. Static exercises can be performed at home with video tutorials that are readily available at home. Video consultation can be applied to conduct virtual remote physiotherapy sessions to encourage patient’s compliance.^31–33

25.6% of the patients felt that there was increased difficulty in accessing healthcare. This could be explained to the fact that number of patient per clinic session was reduced by almost half, leading to longer follow-up intervals or increased difficulty in securing early appointments. Patients were also reluctant to attend hospital appointments due to the fear of contracting the virus and hence, there was a high default rate for clinic appointments. Local studies showed that patients were more reluctant to seek medical attention for health problems during this pandemic.^34,35 Delayed presentation for orthopaedic issues can further complicate treatment management for an otherwise straightforward condition. Delayed abscesses can lead to dissemination and might require more extensive surgical debridement,^36,37 delayed spinal cord compression can lead to permanent neurological deficit and delayed fractures can lead to increased bedbound risks and more technically challenging fixation.^38,39

Whilst governments are trying to put a reign on the pandemic, it is becoming clearer that the virus is tenacious and proving difficult to be eradicated. The mental health impact on delaying orthopaedic interventions should not be disregarded. Our study has demonstrated the incidence of severe fatigue, possible reduction in physical activities and altered healthcare seeking behaviour. As such, this prolonged pandemic is surely to have an unpropitious effect on the management of elective orthopaedic conditions and negatively affect orthopaedic patients’ quality of life. Hospital clinicians should be aware of this fact and take proactive steps in encouraging compliance to conservative management and maintenance of physical fitness.

Table 1.

CFS questionnaire responses.

	Usal or less	More than usual	Total
Tiredness	94	63	157
Need to rest more	85	69	154
Sleepy or drowsy	98	55	153
Problems strating things	119	32	151
Lack of energy	92	61	153
Less strangth in your muscles	96	57	153
Feel weak	110	44	154
Difficulties concentrating	112	39	151
Slip of the tongue when speaking	128	23	151
Difficult to find the right word	124	27	151
How is your memory	117	37	154

Table 2.

Areas of stressors identified by study individulas.

Area of stressors	No. of patients
Self-infection	62 (38.8%)
Transmiiting to family/friends^a	108 (67.5%)
Increased difficulty in healthcare access	41 (25.6%)
Decision on vaccination	31 (19.4)
Loss of job/financial strain	53 (33.1%)
Disrupted work schedule/wfh	52 (32.5%)
Difficulty in family arrangement	43 (26.9%)
Travel restrictions and quarantine orders^a	73 (45.6%)
Limitation on recreational/social activities^a	92 (57.5%)

^atop 3 area of stressors.

Strength and limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to date which examines the incidence of severe fatigue amongst orthopaedic patients during a pandemic. It has also highlighted areas of stressors which provide avenues for improvements. However, the lack of pre-pandemic fatigue levels makes it difficult to ascertain extent of the pandemic’s impact on fatigue levels for orthopaedic patients.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the ruinous impact of a prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on various tenets in orthopaedic care. High prevalence of severe fatigue, altered patient behavioural patterns and postpone of orthopaedic consults and elective operations would have a deleterious effect on the outcomes of elective orthopaedic conditions and the quality of life of orthopaedic patients. Whilst the pandemic has a detrimental impact on mental health, it can be more pronounced on orthopaedic patients.

Footnotes

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study, data collection and processing and analysis of data. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

An Institutional Board waiver was obtained for this study.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the first author.

Disclaimers

None of the authors, their immediate families, or any research foundation with which they are affiliated has received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article

ORCID iDs

Craigven Hao Sheng Sim

Khai Cheong Wong

Tet Sen Howe

Joyce Suang Bee Koh

References

Mahase

. Delta variant: what is happening with transmission, hospital admissions, and restrictions? BMJ 2021; 373: n1513. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1513

Chen

Wang

Gilby

, et al. Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): infectivity, vaccine breakthrough, and antibody resistance. J Chem Inf Model 2022; 62: 412–422.

Sagherian

Steege

Cobb

, et al. Insomnia, fatigue and psychosocial well-being during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of hospital nursing staff in the United States. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(21–22), DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15566

Brewer

Stratton

. Living with chronic fatigue syndrome during lockdown and a global pandemic. Fatigue Biomed Heal Behav 2020; 8: 144–155. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2020.1827503

Sarac

Schoenbrunner

, et al. A review of state guidelines for elective orthopaedic procedures during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102: 942–945. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00510

for Europe WHORO . Pandemic fatigue: reinvigorating the public to prevent COVID-19: policy considerations for Member States in the WHO European Region. Europe: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, 2020.

Williamson

Purcell

Sterne

, et al. The relationship of fatigue to mental and physical health in a community sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005; 40: 126–132. Epub ahead of print 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0858-5

Jackson

The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11). Occupational Medicine 2015; 65, DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqu168

Torrente

Yoris

Low

, et al. Psychological symptoms, mental fatigue and behavioural adherence after 72 continuous days of strict lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina. BJPsych Open 2022; 8: e10.

10.

Bartoszek

Walkowiak

Bartoszek

, et al. Mental well-being (depression, loneliness, insomnia, daily life fatigue) during COVID-19 related home-confinement—A study from Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 7417. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207417

11.

MacIntyre

Nguyen

Chughtai

, et al. Mask use, risk-mitigation behaviours and pandemic fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic in five cities in Australia, the UK and USA: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 106: 199–207. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.056

12.

Pollard

Choy

Gonzalez

, et al. Fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis reflects pain, not disease activity. Rheumatology 2006; 45: 885–889. Epub ahead of print 2006. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel021

13.

Rupp

Boshuizen

Jacobi

, et al. Impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 578–585. Epub ahead of print 2004. DOI: 10.1002/art.20539

14.

Feuerstein

Carter

Papciak

. A prospective analysis of stress and fatigue in recurrent low back pain. Pain 1987; 31: 3, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90162-X

15.

Meeus

Nijs

Meirleir

. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 377–386. Epub ahead of print 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.06.005

16.

Van Dartel

SAA

Repping-Wuts

JWJ

Van Hoogmoed

, et al.

Association between fatigue and pain in rheumatoid arthritis: does pain precede fatigue or does fatigue precede pain?

Arthritis Care Res 2013; 65: 862–869. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21932

17.

Lindberg

Miaskowski

RustøEn

, et al. Factors that can predict pain with walking, 12 months after total knee arthroplasty: a trajectory analysis of 202 patients. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 600–606. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1237440

18.

Oussedik

MacIntyre

Gray

, et al.

Elective orthopaedic cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: where are we now, and where are we heading?

Bone Jt Open 2021; 2: 103–110. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.22.bjo-2020-0161.r1

19.

Nepogodiev

Omar

Glasbey

, et al. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg 2020; 107(11). Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11746

20.

Hodges

Harmer

Dennis

, et al. Prevalence and determinants of fatigue following total knee replacement: a longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Care Res 2016; 68: 1434–1442. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22861

21.

Knebel

Ertl

Lenze

, et al. COVID-19-related cancellation of elective orthopaedic surgery caused increased pain and psychosocial distress levels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29: 2379–2385. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06529-4

22.

Phillips

Chang

Zura

et al. Impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic care: a call for nonoperative management. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis; 2020: 12, DOI: 10.1177/1759720X20934276

23.

Iyengar

Vaish

Vaishya

. Revisiting conservative orthopaedic management of fractures during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020; 11: 718–720. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.010

24.

Witlox

Velthuis

Boer

, et al. Attendance and compliance with an exercise program during localized breast cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial: The PACT study. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0215517. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215517

25.

Hlavaty

Brown

Jason

. The effect of homework compliance on treatment outcomes for participants with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Rehabil Psychol 2011; 56: 212–218. Epub ahead of print 2011. DOI: 10.1037/a0024118

26.

Huffman

Athanasiadis

Anton

, et al. How resilient is your team? Exploring healthcare providers’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Surg 2021; 221: 277–284. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.005

27.

Newcomer

Sinaki

. Low back pain and its relationship to back strength and physical activity in children. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 1433–1439. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb13948.x

28.

Skoffer

Foldspang

. Physical activity and low-back pain in schoolchildren. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 373–379. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0583-8

29.

Hirase

Kataoka

Inokuchi

, et al.

Effects of exercise training combined with increased physical activity to prevent chronic pain in community-dwelling older adults: a preliminary randomized controlled trial Pain

Res Manag 2018; 5;2018:2132039. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2132039

30.

Sluka

O’Donnell

Danielson

, et al. Regular physical activity prevents development of chronic pain and activation of central neurons. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 725–733. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01317.2012

31.

Laver

George

Ratcliffe

, et al. Use of an interactive video gaming program compared with conventional physiotherapy for hospitalised older adults: a feasibility trial. Disabil RehabilEpub. 2012;3412(21):1802-8. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.662570. 2012 Mar . PMID: 22409245.

32.

Russell

Blumke

Richardson

, et al. Telerehabilitation mediated physiotherapy assessment of ankle disorders. Physiother Res Int 2010; 15: 167–175. Epub ahead of print 2010. DOI: 10.1002/pri.471

33.

Fergus

Kafiyat

Merabti

, et al. Remote physiotherapy treatments using wireless body sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2009, Leipzig, Germany, 21–24 June 2009. Epub ahead of print 2009. DOI: 10.1145/1582379.1582640

34.

Tan

HMJ

Tan

Chang

, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the health-seeking behaviour of an Asian population with acute respiratory infections in a densely populated community. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1196. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11200-1

35.

Tay

Ang

Wei

, et al. Health-seeking behavior of COVID-19 cases during the first eight weeks of the outbreak in Singapore: differences between local community and imported cases and having visits to single or multiple healthcare providers. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 239.

36.

Solis

Hameed

Brown

, et al. Delayed emergency surgical presentation: impact of corona virus disease (COVID-19) on non-COVID patients. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90: 1482–1483. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1111/ans.16048

37.

Howley

Odoherty

McEniff

, et al. Late presentation of ‘Lemierre’s syndrome’: how a delay in seeking healthcare and reduced access to routine services resulted in widely disseminated Fusobacterium necrophorum infection during the global COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Case Rep 2020; 13: e239269. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239269

38.

Serra-Torres

Barreda

Weaver

, et al. Delayed presentation of patients with hip fractures during the COVID-19 ‘stay-at-Home’ order in the southmost region of the United States. Adv Orthop 2021; 2021: 8822004. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8822004

39.

Lim

Mulyadi Ridia

Pranata

. Epidemiological pattern of orthopaedic fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 16: 16–23. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.028

A prolonged pandemic impacts the mental health of orthopaedic patients

Abstract

Background and aims

Methods

Results

Discussion and conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Data collection

Participants and recruitment

Variables

Results

Discussion

Strength and limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical approval

Informed consent

Data availability

Disclaimers

ORCID iDs

References