Making (Sense of) an Impact: What Number Matters in Research?

Chakma J Sun GH Steinberg JD Sammut SM Jagsi R . Asia's ascent — global trends in biomedical R&D expenditures. N Engl J Med 2014;370(1):3–6 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1311068.

Journal Citation Reports® [Internet]. New York: Thomson Reuters; c2014 [cited 2014 Dec 1]. Available from: http://thomsonreuters.com/journal-citation-reports/.

Bergstrom CT . Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. Coll Res Lib News 2007;68(5): 314–6.

Hirsch JE . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(46):16569–72 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

Costas R Bordons M . The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J Informetr 2007;1(3):193–203 doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001.

Bornmann L Marx W Gasparyan AY Kitas GD . Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatol Int 2012;32(7):1861–7 doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1.

Radicchi F Fortunato S Castellano C . Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105(45):17268–72 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806977105.

Van Noorden R . Nature News Blog: Scientists join journal editors to fight impact-factor abuse [Internet]. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2013 May 16 [cited 2014 Dec 1]. Available from: http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/05/scientists-join-journal-editors-to-fight-impact-factor-abuse.html.