NageleMKochW: Dynamic function MR of the cervical vertebral column. RoFo157/3: 222–228, 1992.
14.
DvorakJPanjabiMM: Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine18/1: 120–127, 1993.
15.
SeveryDMMathewsonJHBetchcolCO: Controlled automobile rear-end collisions: An investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena. Can Serv Med J11: 727–759, 1955.
16.
McKenzieJAWilliamsJF: The dynamic behaviour of the head and cervical spine during whiplash. J Biomech4: 477–490, 1971.
17.
MackayGM: The effectiveness of vehicle safety design changes in accident and injury reduction. In: Conference for vehicle safety legislation: Its engineering and social implications. Institute of mechanical engineers, London1973.
18.
DeansGTMagalliardJN: Neck sprain — A major cause of disability following car accidents. Injury18: 10–12, 1987.
19.
NygrenA: Injuries to car occupants — Some aspects of the interior safety of cars. Acta Otolaryngol92: 103, 1984.
20.
OlneyDBMardsenAK: The effect of head restraints and seat belts on the incidence of neck injury in car accidents. Injury17: 365–367, 1986.
21.
KahaneCJ: An evaluation of head restraints. Federal motor vehicle safety standard 202. United States Department of transportation national highway and traffic safety administration, Washington DC1982.
22.
O'NeillBHaddonW: Automobile head restraints -frequency of neck injury claims in relation to the presence of head restraints. Am J Public Health62: 399–406, 1972.
EvansRW: The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury. Neurologic Clinics10/4: 815–847, 1992.
31.
BallaJIansekR: Headache arising from disorders of the cervical spine. In: HopkinsA (ed): Headache: Problems in diagnosis and management. Saunders, London1988.
32.
HohlM: Soft-tissue injuries of the neck in automobile accidents: Factors influencing prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg56A: 1675–1682, 1974.
33.
RadanovBPSturzeneggerM: Relationship between early somatic, radiological, cognitive and psychosocial findings and outcome during a one-year follow-up in 117 patients suffering from common whiplash. Br J Rheumatol33/5: 442–448, 1994.
34.
NorrisSHWattI: The prognosis of neck injuries resulting from rear end vehicle collisions. J Bone Joint Surg65: 608–611, 1983.
35.
FazlMLaFebvreJ: Posttraumatic disruption of the cervical spine, an easily overlooked diagnosis: Presentation of three cases. Neurosurgery26/4: 674–677, 1990.
36.
PennieBHAgambarL: Patterns of injury and recovery in whiplash. Injury22/1: 57–59, 1991.
37.
KinoshitaH: Pathology of hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. Paraplegia32/6: 367–374, 1994.
38.
CintronEGilulaL: The widened disk space: A sign of cervical hyperextension injury. Radiology141: 639–644, 1981.
39.
KangJDFiggieMPBohlmanHH: Sagittal measurements of the cervical spine in subaxial fractures and dislocations. An analysis of two hundred and eighty-eight patients with and without neurological deficits. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A76/11: 1617–1628, 1994.
40.
TaylorA: The mechanism of injury to the spinal cord in the neck without damage to the vertebral column. J Bone Joint Surg33B: 543–547, 1951.
41.
van den HauweLDe SchepperAM: Whiplash trauma: A study of 200 litigation claims. European Radiology5: S290, 1995.
42.
HarrisJH: Number of plain radiographs necessary to evaluate the cervical spine in trauma patients. Am J Roentgenol163/1: 217–218, 1994.
43.
FrickerRGachterA: Lateral flexion/ radiographs: Still recommended following cervical spinal injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg113/2: 115–116, 1994.
AchesonMBLivingstonRRRichardsonML: High-resolution CT-scanning in the evaluation of cervical spine fractures: Comparison with plain film examinations. Am J Roentgenol148: 1179, 1987.
46.
HandelSFLeeYY: Computed tomography of spinal fractures. Radiol Clin North Am19: 69, 1981.
47.
EharaSEl-KhouryGYClarkCR: Radiologic evaluation of dens fracture: Role of plain radiography and tomography. Spine17: 475–479, 1992.
48.
El-KhouryGYKatholMHDanielWH: Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: Value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol164/1: 43–50, 1995.
49.
Van GoethemJvan den HauweLParizelP: Whiplash: Definition, classification and radiological findings. In: Radiologisch Uur van het UZA. UZA, Antwerp1994.
50.
PetterssonKHildingssonC: MRI and neurology in acute whiplash trauma. Acta Orthop Scand65/5: 525–528, 1994.
51.
FagerlundMBjörnebrinkJ: MRI in acute phase of whiplash injury. Eur Radiol5: 297–301, 1995.
52.
GoldbergARothfusWDeebZ: The impact of magnetic resonance on the diagnostic evaluation of acute cervi-cothoracic trauma. Skeletal Radiol17: 89–95, 1988.
53.
IgnelziR: The potential role of low field MR with open design in assessing ligamentous injury in acute cervical trauma. Surg Neurol39: 519–529, 1993.