Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose

Although symptoms are expected to improve after the resection of pituitary macroadenomas, tumor resection volume does not always correlate with the patient’s symptoms. Our objectives were to assess the pre and postoperative volumes of pituitary macroadenomas before, immediately after surgery and at follow-up, and to explore possible associations and correlations among these changes and symptoms.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies at 24 hours and at 3, 6 and 9 months follow-up of 146 patients who underwent surgery for pituitary macroadenomas. We measured tumor volumes before and after surgery and compared changes with symptom improvement.

Results

The mean preoperative tumor volume was 24.66 cm³ (standard deviation 65.18 cm³, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14–35.32). The most common symptoms were visual/cranial nerve abnormalities (65%) and headaches (56%). Immediately after surgery, symptoms persisted without significant changes in all patients. A progressive tumor volume decrease was noted during follow-up, and symptoms improved in 78% of patients. Despite no imaging evidence of chiasm or cavernous sinus compression, 32 patients showed no symptom improvement. Patients with symptoms for more than 1 year (mean duration of symptoms 26 months, SD 24.3, 95% CI 22.03–29.97 months) had a higher risk of the persistence of symptoms compared to patients with a mean duration of symptoms of less than 1 year (odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 2.4–3, P < 0.005).

Conclusions

The duration of symptoms prior of surgery is a more important factor than tumor resection volume alone when considering the long-term outcome of symptoms. Furthermore, lack of symptom improvement in the immediate postoperative period does not necessarily represent an inadequate resection.

Keywords

Clinical outcome macroadenoma resection volume

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sharif-Alhoseini

Rahimi-Movaghar

. Pituitary adenomas: a review. J Inj Violence Res 2012; 4(3 Suppl. 1): 56.

Ezzat

et al.

The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 2004; 101: 613–619.

Kovacs

Horvath

Vidal

. Classification of pituitary adenomas. J Neuro-Oncol 2001; 54: 121–127.

Levy

Matharu

Meeran

et al.

The clinical characteristics of headache in patients with pituitary tumours. Brain 2005; 128: 1921–1930.

Huang

. The influence of pituitary adenoma size on vision and visual outcomes after trans-sphenoidal adenectomy: a report of 78 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 57: 23–31.

Vargas

et al.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of 485 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Int J Endocrinol 2015; 2015: 756069.

Wei

et al.

Relationship between pituitary adenoma texture and collagen content revealed by comparative study of MRI and pathology analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 12898–12905.

Dos Santos

ARL

et al.

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas: technical aspects and report of casuistic. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2010; 68: 608–612.

Muskens

et al.

Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary 2017; 0: 1–14.

10.

Kim

Lee

Kim

. Cranial nerve palsies accompanying pituitary tumour. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14: 1158–1162.

11.

Gnanalingham

Bhattacharjee

Pennington

et al.

The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 415–419.

12.

Thotakura

Patibandla

Panigrahi

et al.

Predictors of visual outcome with transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas having suprasellar extension: a prospective series of 100 cases and brief review of the literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2017; 12: 1.

13.

Knosp

Steiner

Kitz

et al.

Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 610–618.

14.

Davies

Carr

Soh

et al.

Assessing size of pituitary adenomas: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative methods on MR. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 677–683.

15.

Yoon

et al.

Pituitary adenomas: early postoperative MR imaging after transsphenoidal resection. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1097–1104.

16.

Kremer

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging after transsphenoidal surgery of clinically nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas and its impact on detecting residual adenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144: 433–443.

17.

Yoneoka

et al.

Early morphological recovery of the optic chiasm is associated with excellent visual outcome in patients with compressive chiasmal syndrome caused by pituitary tumors. Neurol Res 2015; 37(1): 1–8.

18.

Sun

Zhang

Z-Q

C-Y

et al.

Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; 10(11): 1742–1750.

19.

Pierallini

et al.

Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging – initial experience. Radiology 2006; 239: 223–231.

20.

Boxerman

et al.

Preoperative MRI evaluation of pituitary macroadenoma: imaging features predictive of successful transsphenoidal surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 720–728.

21.

Cohen

Cooper

Kupersmith

et al.

Visual recovery after transsphenoidal removal of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 1985; 17: 446–452.

22.

Gondim

Almeida

JPC

Albuquerque

LAF

et al.

Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach. World Neurosurg 2014; 82: e281–e290.

23.

Wolf

et al.

Quantitative evaluation of headache severity before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 2015; 124: 1–7.

24.

Abouaf

Vighetto

Lebas

. Neuro-ophthalmologic exploration in non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2015; 76: 210–219.

25.

Nawar

Abdel Mannan

Selman

et al.

Pituitary tumor apoplexy: a review. J Intens Care Med 2008; 23: 75–90.

26.

Chuang

C-C

et al.

Surgical outcome of oculomotor nerve palsy in pituitary adenoma. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18: 1463–1468.

Relationship between postoperative volume of macroadenomas and clinical outcome after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References