Analysis of variability of fractional anisotropy values at 3T using a novel diffusion tensor imaging phantom

Abstract

We employed a novel diffusion tensor imaging phantom to study intra- and interscanner reproducibility on two 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. Using a phantom containing thousands of hollow micron-size tubes in complex arrays, we performed two experiments using a b value of 1000 s/ms² on two Siemens 3T Trio scanners. First, we performed 12-direction scans. Second, on one scanner, we performed two 64-direction protocols with different repetition times (TRs). We used a one-way analysis of variance to calculate differences between scanners and the Mann-Whitney U test to assess differences between 12-direction and 64-direction data. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CoV) for intrascanner and interscanner data. For 12-direction protocols, mean fractional anisotropy (FA) was 0.3003 for Scanner 1 (four scans) and 0.3094 for Scanner 2 (three scans). Lowest FA value on Scanner 1 was 2.56 standard deviations below the mean of Scanner 2. For 64-direction scans, mean FA was 0.2640 for 4000 ms TR and 0.2582 for 13,200 ms TR scans. For 12-direction scans, within-scanner CoV was 0.0326 for Scanner 1 and 0.0240 for Scanner 2; between-scanner CoV was 0.032. For 64-direction scans, CoV was 0.056 for TR 4000 ms and 0.0533 for TR 13,200 ms. The difference between median FA values of 12-direction and 64-direction scans was statistically significant (p < 0.001). We found relatively good reproducibility on any single MR scanner. FA values from one scanner were sometimes significantly below the mean FA of another scanner, which has important implications for clinical use of DTI.

Keywords

Brain diffusion fractional anisotropy imaging phantom quantitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hakulinen

Brander

Ryymin

et al.

Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain. BMC Med Imaging 2012; 12: 30.

Hasan

Gupta

Santos

et al.

Diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy of the normal-appearing seven segments of the corpus callosum in healthy adults and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 735–743.

Takao

Hayashi

Kabasawa

et al.

Effect of scanner in longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 466–477.

Giannelli

Cosottini

Michelassi

et al.

Dependence of brain DTI maps of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity on the number of diffusion weighting directions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 11: 2927.

Giannelli

Belmonte

Toschi

et al.

DTI measurements of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity at 1.5T: Comparison of two radiofrequency head coils with different functional designs and sensitivities. Med Phys 2011; 38: 3205–3211.

Marenco

Rawlings

Rohde

et al.

Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging. Psychiatry Res 2006; 147: 69–78.

Vollmar

O’Muircheartaigh

Barker

et al.

Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners. Neuroimage 2010; 51: 1384–1394.

Mirzaalian

de Pierrefeu

Savadjiev

et al.

Harmonizing diffusion MRI data across multiple sites and scanners. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2015; 9349: 12–19.

Guise

Fernandes

Nobrega

et al.

Hollow polypropylene yarns as a biomimetic brain phantom for the validation of high-definition fiber tractography imaging. Appl Mater Interface 2016; 9: 29960–29967.

10.

Jenkinson

Beckmann

Behrens

et al.

FSL. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 782–790.

11.

Andersson J, Jenkinson M and Smith S. Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation. Technical Report TR07JA2, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/techrep (2007, accessed 11 March 2018).

12.

MacDonald

Johnson

Cooper

et al.

Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2091–2100.

13.

Matsushita

Hosoda

Naitoh

et al.

Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in the acute stage of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury for detecting white matter lesions and predicting long-term cognitive function in adults. J Neurosurg 2011; 115: 130–139.

14.

Kraus

Susmaras

Caughlin

et al.

White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain 2007; 130: 2508–2519.

15.

Shifteh

Gold

et al.

Diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive impairment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 293–297.