Past research showed that Evaluative Conditioning (EC) effects are shaped by the framing of the relationship between conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (US). We tested if causal directionality—whether the CS causes the US or the US causes the CS—moderates EC effects. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 680), participants viewed food brands (CSs) paired with facial expressions (USs). In Experiment 1, the EC effect was stronger in the CS-causes-US than in the US-causes-CS condition, but this emerged only in self-reports. Experiment 2 extended these findings to a health-related context, with expressions framed as physical comfort/discomfort. Stronger EC effects emerged in the CS-causes-US condition on both self-report and Implicit Association Test (IAT). Aggregated analyses suggest that the superiority of the CS-causes-US (vs. US-causes-CS) condition emerged on both measures. These results refine a propositional view of EC, showing that pairing may function as a symbolic cue conveying more than co-occurrence.
AllportG. W. (1935). Attitudes. In MurchisonC. A. (Ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 798–844). Clark University Press.
2.
BadingK. C.BarthM.RothermundK. (2025). Evidence for an evaluative effect of stimulus co-occurrence may be inflated by evaluative differences between assimilative and contrastive relations. Cognition and Emotion, 39, 1995–2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2460099
3.
BaeyensF.EelenP.CrombezG.Van den BerghO. (1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90136-5
CorneilleO.LushP. (2023). Sixty years after Orne’s American psychologist article: A conceptual framework for subjective experiences elicited by demand characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221104368
6.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
De HouwerJ.HughesS. (2016). Evaluative conditioning as a symbolic phenomenon: On the relation between evaluative conditioning, evaluative conditioning via instructions, and persuasion. Social Cognition, 34(5), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.480
9.
De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2019). On the assumptions that we make about the world around us: A conceptual framework for feature transformation effects. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.229
10.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 127–183). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.004
11.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
12.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition and Emotion, 26(3), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.588687
13.
GastA.LangerS.SengewaldM. A. (2016). Evaluative conditioning increases with temporal contiguity. The influence of stimulus order and stimulus interval on evaluative conditioning. Acta Psychologica, 170, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.002
14.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
15.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
16.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
17.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216673351
18.
HughesS.UnkelbachC.RougierM.De HouwerJ. (2024). The shared feature principle in person perception: Shared features lead to assumptions about other features. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), 117780. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117780
19.
HughesS.YeY.Van DesselP.De HouwerJ. (2019). When people co-occur with good or bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218781340
20.
KurdiB.BanajiM. R. (2019). Attitude change via repeated evaluative pairings versus evaluative statements: Shared and unique features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000151
LundqvistD.FlyktA.ÖhmanA. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) [CD-ROM]. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet.
23.
MattavelliS.FiambertiG. C.MasiM.BrambillaM. (2023). The “Happy Face Killer” in the eyes of the beholder: Relational encoding of facial emotions in context influences trustworthiness attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109, 104517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104517
24.
MattavelliS.MasiM.BrambillaM. (2023). Not just about faces in context: Face–context relation moderates the impact of contextual threat on facial trustworthiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211065933
25.
MitchellC. J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000855
MoranT.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2016). The assimilative effect of co-occurrence on evaluation above and beyond the effect of relational qualifiers. Social Cognition, 34(5), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.435
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418
30.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.LuminetO.YzerbytV. (2007). Aware and (dis) liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
31.
RougierM.De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2023). From halo to conditioning and back again: Exploring the links between impression formation and learning. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 84560. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.84560
32.
SchönbrodtF. D.WagenmakersE. J. (2018). Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y
WaldmannM. R.HolyoakK. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.222
36.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
