In spontaneous trait transference (STT), communicators describing the behavior of others (i.e., actors) are perceived as having the personality traits implied by the behavior they describe. We tested whether this effect relies on moderators that are indicative of rule-based, attributional processes: the communicator-actor relation (friends vs. enemies; Experiment 1), the diagnosticity of the statement for inferring the implied trait to the communicator (Experiment 2), and the validity of the statement (i.e., whether it was actually provided by the communicator; Experiment 3). In line with attributional theories, trait ratings revealed a joint impact of the three moderators. Experiment 4 showed that communicators were attributed alternative traits—not implied by the behavior itself, but by the fact that they described the behavior. Together, our results suggest that participants attribute traits to the communicator based on the communicator’s behavior (i.e., the act of describing the behavior of someone else).
BadingK.StahlC.RothermundK. (2019). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: the role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
2.
BaeyensF.EelenP.CrombezG.Van Den BerghO. (1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90136-5
3.
BainbridgeW. A.IsolaP.OlivaA. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872
BrownR. D.BassiliJ. N. (2002). Spontaneous trait associations and the case of the superstitious banana. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1486
6.
CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J. (2005). Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.884
7.
CorrellJ.MellingerC.PedersenE. J. (2021). Flexible approaches for estimating partial eta squared in mixed-effects models with crossed random factors. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1626–1642. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01687-2
8.
CrawfordM. T.SkowronskiJ. J.StiffC.SchererC. R. (2007). Interfering with inferential, but not associative, processes underlying spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298567
9.
CumminsJ.De HouwerJ. (2022). Are relational implicit measures sensitive to relational information?Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 38621. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.38621
10.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600006491
11.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.1
De HouwerJ.GawronskiB.Barnes-HolmesD. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 252–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
14.
De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2019). On the assumptions that we make about the world around us: A conceptual framework for feature transformation effects. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.229
15.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 127–183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.004
16.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2021). Attitudes as propositional representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003
17.
de LeeuwJ. R. (2015). JsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
18.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
19.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition & Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
20.
GorenA.TodorovA. (2009). Two faces are better than one: Eliminating false trait associations with faces. Social Cognition, 27(2), 222–248. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.222
HenningerF.ShevchenkoY.MertensU. K.KieslichP. J.HilbigB. E. (2022). Lab.js: A free, open, online study builder. Behavior Research Methods, 54(2), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5
23.
HögdenF.UnkelbachC. (2021). The role of relational qualifiers in attribute conditioning: Does disliking an athletic person make you unathletic?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220945538
24.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216673351
25.
HughesS.YeY.Van DesselP.De HouwerJ. (2019). When people co-occur with good or bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218781340
26.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
KruseF.DegnerJ. (2021). Spontaneous state inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(4), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000232
29.
KruseF.DegnerJ. (2023). Do faces matter? On the interaction of face- and behavior-inferences in spontaneous impression formation. Unpublished Manuscript.
30.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
31.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
32.
MarienH.CustersR.HassinR. R.AartsH. (2012). Unconscious goal activation and the hijacking of the executive function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028955
33.
McConnellA. R.RydellR. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model: A Dual-systems approach to attitudes. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 204–218). The Guilford Press.
MoranT. (2024). The effect of irrelevant pairings on evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 112, 104602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104602
MoranT.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2017). The effect of the validity of co-occurrence on automatic and deliberate evaluations: Validity and automatic evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2266
PetersK.KashimaY. (2015). Bad habit or social good? How perceptions of gossiper morality are related to gossip content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 784–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2123
41.
RoedigerH. L.McDermottK. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
42.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
43.
RougierM.De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2023). From halo to conditioning and back again: Exploring the links between impression formation and learning. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 84560. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.84560
44.
RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio, PBC. https://www.rstudio.com/
45.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
46.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E.MaeL.CrawfordM. T. (1998). Spontaneous trait transference: Communicators take on the qualities they describe in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.837
47.
TodorovA.UlemanJ. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1051
48.
TodorovA.UlemanJ. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00059-3
49.
UlemanJ. S. (1988). Trait and gist inference norms for over 300 potential trait-implying sentences. Unpublished raw data.
Van OverwalleF.Van DuynslaegerM.CoomansD.TimmermansB. (2012). Spontaneous goal inferences are often inferred faster than spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.016
52.
WellsB. M.SkowronskiJ. J.CrawfordM. T.SchererC. R.CarlstonD. E. (2011). Inference making and linking both require thinking: Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference both rely on working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.013
53.
WyerR. S.BudesheimT. L.LambertA. J. (1990). Cognitive representation of conversations about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.218
54.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
