Abstract
The 2023 pro-democracy movement in Israel was marked by massive protests against proposed judicial reforms. Although they remained nonviolent, these protests became increasingly disruptive, employing roadblocks, strikes, and “days of disruption.” Did the choice to adopt disruptive tactics help or hurt the movement? To answer this question, we conducted a four-wave longitudinal study among 1,004 Israeli respondents. Latent growth-curve analysis revealed that the protests’ increasing disruptiveness was linked to increased support for negotiations and compromise among weak (but not strong) opponents of the movement. In addition, as tactics became increasingly disruptive, self-reported participation increased among those who initially sympathized with the protests. Our findings suggest that the use of (nonviolent) disruptive tactics helped the Israeli pro-democracy movement by winning support from opponents while allowing the movement to mobilize supporters. The present findings extend our understanding of disruptive protests’ effectiveness and inform other movements aimed at forestalling democratic backsliding.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Channel 7. Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
