This research examines how rising income inequality prompts longer work hours. In Study 1, the largest cross-national analysis to date (2,798 country-years; 1960–2019), a one-tenth increase in a country’s Gini index predicted an additional 60 annual work hours per capita. In Study 2, a large-scale longitudinal study in the United States (33,083 participants; 1968–2021), increasing state-level Gini index predicted longer work hours over time, particularly among individuals with low income, Black Americans, and women. In Study 3, a large-scale longitudinal study in China (26,251 participants; 2012–2020), increasing individual-level perceptions of inequality predicted longer work hours over time across all subgroups; by contrast, increasing province-level Gini index predicted longer work hours only among individuals with urban hukou, not among those with rural hukou. By integrating cross-national and longitudinal data, examining subgroup variation, and incorporating perceptions of inequality, this research provides a nuanced account of the link between rising inequality and longer work hours.
AkeeR.JonesM. R.PorterS. R. (2019). Race matters: Income shares, income inequality, and income mobility for all US races. Demography, 56, 999–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00773-7
2.
AlexiouC.KartiyasaA. (2020). Does greater income inequality cause increased work hours? New evidence from high income economies. Bulletin of Economic Research, 72(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12226
3.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage.
4.
BartramD. (2022). Does inequality exacerbate status anxiety among higher earners? A longitudinal evaluation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 63(4), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152221094815
5.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995
BrowmanA. S.DestinM.KearneyM. S.LevineP. B. (2019). How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0523-0
8.
BrüderlJ.LudwigV. (2015). Fixed-effects panel regression. In BestH.WolfC. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of regression analysis and causal inference (pp. 327–357). Sage.
9.
CallanM. J.SheadN. W.OlsonJ. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024778
10.
ChanK. W.ZhangL. (1999). The hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: Processes and changes. The China Quarterly, 160, 818–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000001351
11.
ChancelL.PikettyT.SaezE.ZucmanG. (2022). World inequality report 2022. Harvard University Press.
CollinsC.LandivarL. C.RuppannerL.ScarboroughW. J. (2021). COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12506
14.
DoobC. B. (2019). Social inequality and social stratification in US society. Routledge.
15.
DuH. (2024). Economic Inequality. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Subjective well-being and life satisfaction: A social psychological perspective (2nd ed.). Routledge.
16.
DuH.ChenA.LiY.MaL.XingQ.NieY. (2022). Perceived income inequality increases status seeking among low social class individuals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12455
17.
DuH.GötzF. M.KingR. B.RentfrowP. J. (2024). The psychological imprint of inequality: Economic inequality shapes achievement and power values in human life. Journal of Personality, 92(1), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12758
18.
DuH.KingR. B. (2022). What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12468
19.
DuH.KingR. B.ChiP. (2019). Income inequality is detrimental to long-term well-being: A large-scale longitudinal investigation in China. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.043
20.
FeenstraR. C.InklaarR.TimmerM. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954
FilippiS.Salvador CasaraB. G.PetersK.MaassA.FeracoT.SuitnerC. (2025). They don’t really care about us: The impact of perceived vertical pay disparity on employee well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2415127
23.
FilippiS.Salvador CasaraB. G.PirroneD.YerkesM.SuitnerC. (2023). Economic inequality increases the number of hours worked and decreases work–life balance perceptions: Longitudinal and experimental evidence. Royal Society Open Science, 10(10), 230187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230187
24.
García-CastroJ. D.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008
25.
GiesselmannM.Schmidt-CatranA. W. (2022). Interactions in fixed effects regression models. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(3), 1100–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914934
26.
Goya-TocchettoD.PayneB. K. (2022). How economic inequality shapes thought and action. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1277
27.
GravelleH. (1998). How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact?British Medical Journal, 316(7128), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7128.382
HelfatC. E.HarrisD.WolfsonP. J. (2006). The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of US corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(4), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.23270306
30.
HillT. D.DavisA. P.RoosJ. M.FrenchM. T. (2020). Limitations of fixed-effects models for panel data. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419863785
31.
HungJ. (2022). Hukou system influencing the structural, institutional inequalities in China: The multifaceted disadvantages rural hukou holders face. Social Sciences, 11(5), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050194
32.
JachimowiczJ. M.SzasziB.LukasM.SmerdonD.PrabhuJ.WeberE. U. (2020). Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(7), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0849-2
33.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2005). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Harvard University Press.
34.
JiY.WuX.SunS.HeG. (2017). Unequal care, unequal work: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of gender inequality in post-reform urban China. Sex Roles, 77(11), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0751-1
35.
KimY.SommetN. (2023). Income is a stronger predictor of subjective social class in more economically unequal places. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231210772
36.
KivimäkiM.JokelaM.NybergS. T.Singh-ManouxA.FranssonE. I.AlfredssonL.BjornerJ. B.BorritzM.BurrH.CasiniA. (2015). Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603 838 individuals. The Lancet, 386(10005), 1739–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60295-1
37.
KnightJ.GunatilakaR. (2010). The rural–urban divide in China: Income but not happiness?The Journal of Development Studies, 46(3), 506–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380903012763
38.
KrausM. W.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Americans misperceive racial economic equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10324–10331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707719114
39.
LenskiG. E. (1984). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. UNC Press Books.
LynchJ.SmithG. D.HarperS. A.HillemeierM.RossN.KaplanG. A.WolfsonM. (2004). Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(1), 5–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00302.x
42.
McCallL.BurkD.LaperrièreM.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans’ opportunity beliefs and policy support. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9593–9598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706253114
43.
McNeishD.KelleyK. (2019). Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000182
44.
OishiS.BakH.CaluoriN. (2022). Cultural psychology of inequality: Current and future directions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12516
45.
OishiS.KushlevK.SchimmackU. (2018). Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. American Psychologist, 73(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000166
46.
OliverM.ShapiroT. (2013). Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. Routledge.
47.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). What are Equivalence Scales?OECD iLibrary.
48.
OsgoodD. W. (2010). Statistical models of life events and criminal behavior. In AlexR. P.DavidW. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 375–396). Springer.
49.
PayneB. K.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.HannayJ. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114
50.
PerrymanA. A.FernandoG. D.TripathyA. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579–586. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.013
51.
PetersK.JettenJ. (2023). How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives. British Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12632
52.
PetersK.JettenJ.TanjitpiyanondP.WangZ.MolsF.VerkuytenM. (2022). The language of inequality: Evidence economic inequality increases wealth category salience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(8), 1204–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616722110366
53.
QureshiZ. (2023). Rising inequality: A major issue of our time. Brookings.
RohrerJ. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
56.
RothenbergP. S. (2004). Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study. Macmillan.
57.
SainzM.Moreno-BellaE.Torres-VegaL. C. (2023). Perceived unequal and unfair workplaces trigger lower job satisfaction and lower workers’ dignity via organizational dehumanization and workers’ self-objectification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(5), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2944
58.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.Rodríguez-BailónR.WillisG. B. (2023). The economic inequality as normative information model (EINIM). European Review of Social Psychology, 34(2), 346–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2160555
59.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.JettenJ.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557
60.
SandsM. L. (2017). Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(4), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615010113
61.
SandsM. L.de KadtD. (2020). Local exposure to inequality raises support of people of low wealth for taxing the wealthy. Nature, 586(7828), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2763-1
62.
ScheinA.HaruviN. (2017). The Relationship between the Average Workweek Length and Per Capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). International Studies of Management & Organization, 47(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2017.1382268
63.
SchmalorA.HeineS. J. (2022). Subjective economic inequality decreases emotional intelligence, especially for people of high social class. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211024024
64.
SeligmanM. E.BeagleyG. (1975). Learned helplessness in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88(2), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076430
65.
ShihY.-C. T.BradleyC.YabroffK. R. (2023). Ecological and individualistic fallacies in health disparities research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 115(5), 488–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad047
66.
SoltF. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12295
67.
SoltF. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795
68.
SommetN.ElliotA. J. (2023a). A competitiveness-based theoretical framework on the psychology of income inequality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(4), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721423115956
69.
SommetN.ElliotA. J. (2023b). Opposing effects of income inequality on health: The role of perceived competitiveness and avoidance/approach motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2884
70.
TanjitpiyanondP.JettenJ.PetersK. (2023). A social identity analysis of how pay inequality divides the workplace. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(3), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221074550
71.
TopuzS. G. (2022). The relationship between income inequality and economic growth: Are transmission channels effective?Social Indicators Research, 162(3), 1177–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02882-0
WangZ.JettenJ.SteffensN. K. (2023). Restless in an unequal world: Economic inequality fuels the desire for wealth and status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(6), 871–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221083747
74.
WeiC.DangJ.LiuL.LiC.TanX.GuZ. (2023). Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(2), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12610
75.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin.
76.
WillisG. B.García-SánchezE.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.García-CastroJ. D.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
77.
WongK.ChanA. H.NganS. (2019). The effect of long working hours and overtime on occupational health: A meta-analysis of evidence from 1998 to 2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122102
78.
WuQ.XieY. (2014). The effects of contextual and individual-level factors on Chinese adults’ attitudes toward social environments. Chinese Sociological Review, 47(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555470104
79.
XiaoY.BianY. (2018). The influence of hukou and college education in China’s labour market. Urban Studies, 55(7), 1504–1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017690471
80.
ZhaoS.HuangC.ChiP.DuH. (2024). Economic inequality attenuates the positive relationship between perceptions of social mobility and subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 19(2), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10263-z
81.
ZhouY. (2019). Economic resources, cultural matching, and the rural–urban boundary in China’s marriage market. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(3), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12559
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
