The present research compared the effectiveness of meaningful negation—“That’s wrong”—and simple negation—“No”—to alter automatic prejudice. Participants were trained to negate prejudice-consistent or prejudice-inconsistent information, using either simple or meaningful negation, and completed an evaluative priming measure of racial prejudice before and after training. No significant changes in automatic prejudice in the simple negation conditions emerged. In contrast, those trained to negate prejudice-consistent information in a more meaningful way showed a significant decrease in automatic prejudice, whereas those trained to negate prejudice-inconsistent information meaningfully showed a significant increase. Study 2 revealed that these effects were driven by participants high in their motivation to control prejudiced reactions (MCPR), as they demonstrated the greatest changes in automatic prejudice following training. Contrary to research suggesting negation training is an ineffective means to reduce automatic racial prejudice, the present research suggests negation can be effective when the negation is meaningful.
AllenT. J.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2010). Social context and the self-regulation of implicit bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 137–149. doi:10.1177/1368430209353635
2.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
3.
BlairI. V.BanajiM. H. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142
4.
BoucherK. L.RydellR. J. (2012). Impact of negation salience and cognitive resources on negation during attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1329–1342. doi:10.1177/0146167212450464
5.
BrighamJ. C. (1993). College students’ racial attitudes. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology, 23, 1933–1967. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01074.x
6.
DeutschR.GawronskiB.StrackF. (2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 385–405. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.385
7.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice-habit breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267–1278. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
8.
DevineP. G.PlantE. A.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.VanceS. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835
9.
DovidoJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 51–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01848.x
10.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326. doi:10.1177/0146167297233009
11.
EssesV. M.HaddockG.ZannaM. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions of determinants of intergroup attitudes. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137–366). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
13.
GawronskiB.DeutschR.MbirkouS.SeibtB.StrackF. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004
14.
GilbertD. T.OsborneR. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940–949. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.940
15.
GilbertD. T.TafarodiR. W.MaloneP. S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 221–233. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221
16.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
17.
GreggA. P.SeibtB.BanajiM. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
18.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
19.
JellisonW. A.McConnellA. R.GabrielS. (2004). Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: Ingroup preferences and related behaviors and beliefs among gay and straight men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 629–642. doi:10.1177/0146167203262076
20.
KawakamiK.DovidioJ. F.MollJ.HermsenS.RussinA. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
21.
LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS.CerrutiC.ShinJ. L.Joy-GabaJ. A.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing racial implicit preferences: A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785. doi:10.1037/a0036260
22.
LivingstonR. (2008). Why are some individuals not racially biased? Susceptibility to affective conditioning predicts nonprejudice towards Blacks. Psychological Science, 18, 816–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01985.x
23.
LivingstonR. W.DrweckiB. B. (2007). Why are some individuals not racially biased? Susceptibility to affective conditioning predicts nonprejudice toward Blacks. Psychological Science, 18, 816–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01985.x
24.
MacraeC. N.MilneA. B.BodenhausenG. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 37–47. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37
25.
MadduxW. W.BardenJ.BrewerM. B.PettyR. E. (2005). Saying no to negativity: The effects of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 19–35. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002
26.
MayoR.SchulY.BurnsteinE. (2004). “I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 433–449. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.008
27.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469–485. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.469
28.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
29.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1–11. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2601_1
30.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421–433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004
31.
PetersK. R.GawronskiB. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 557–569. doi:10.1177/0146167211400423
32.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657
33.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.JarvisW. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 21–41. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21
34.
PlantA. E.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
35.
SkitkaL.BaumanC. W.SargisE. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895–917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895
36.
StangorC.SullivanL. A.FordT. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359–380. doi:10.1521/soco.1991.9.4.359
37.
TurnerR. N.CrispR. J. (2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142. doi:10.1348/014466609X419901
38.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1997).The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
WheelerS. C.PettyR. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
