Brief messages have the flexibility to reach the public quickly and the potential to ignite social change. We use recent advances in antiracist messaging to create and compare four messages that differ in their focus of intervention. Two experiments randomly exposed participants to messages emphasizing either (a) awareness of personal race bias; (b) empathy for targets of racism; (c) the need for racial justice, or (d) social norms about the unacceptability of racism. Participants exposed to the empathy for targets message reported significantly more allophilia, egalitarianism, and awareness of racism (Study 1; N = 658), as well as more antiracism (Study 2; N = 813) than those exposed to the other messages. Moderation tests showed that the effectiveness of empathy-focused messaging did not depend on trait empathy or trait motivation. This work underscores the effectiveness of encouraging empathy for targets when promoting antiracism.
AdidaC. L.LoA.PlatasM. R. (2018). Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), 9521–9526.
2.
Álvarez-BenjumeaA.WinterF. (2020). The breakdown of antiracist norms: A natural experiment on hate speech after terrorist attacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(37), 22800–22804.
3.
BlanchardF. A.CrandallC. S.BrighamJ. C.VaughnL. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 993.
4.
BruneauE. G.SaxeR. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855–866.
5.
CallaghanB.HarouniL.DupreeC. H.KrausM. W.RichesonJ. A. (2021). Testing the efficacy of three informational interventions for reducing misperceptions of the Black–White wealth gap. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(38), e2108875118.
6.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’brienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359.
7.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
8.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278.
9.
DiAngeloR. (2022). White Fragility: Why Understanding Racism Can Be So Hard for White People (Adapted for Young Adults). Beacon Press.
10.
DixonJ.TroppL. R.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2010). “Let them eat harmony” prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 76–80.
11.
DonaldJ. N.BradshawE. L.ConigraveJ. H.ParkerP. D.ByattL. L.NoetelM.RyanR. M. (2021). Paths to the light and dark sides of human nature: A meta-analytic review of the prosocial benefits of autonomy and the antisocial costs of control. Psychological Bulletin, 147(9), 921.
12.
DovidioJ. F.JohnsonJ. D.GaertnerS. L.PearsonA. R.SaguyT.Ashburn-NardoL. (2010). Empathy and Intergroup Relations. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 393–408).
13.
EnsariN.ChristianJ.KuriyamaD. M.MillerN. (2012). The personalization model revisited: An experimental investigation of the role of five personalization-based strategies on prejudice reduction. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 503–522.
14.
EyalT.SteffelM.EpleyN. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547.
15.
EzellJ. M. (2023). “Trickle-down” racial empathy in American higher education: Moving beyond performative wokeness and academic panels to spark racial equity. Journal of Education, 203(3), 718–725.
16.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.
19.
HuntJ. S.FolbergA. M.RyanC. S. (2021). Tolerance of racism: A new construct that predicts failure to recognize and confront racism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 551–571.
20.
JargonM.ThijsJ. (2021). Antiprejudice norms and ethnic attitudes in preadolescents: A matter of stimulating the “right reasons.”Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(3), 468–487.
21.
KallaJ. L.BroockmanD. E. (2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410–425.
22.
KallaJ. L.BroockmanD. E. (2023). Which narrative strategies durably reduce prejudice? Evidence from field and survey experiments supporting the efficacy of perspective-getting. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 185–204.
23.
KawakamiK.DovidioJ. F.Van KampS. (2007). The impact of counterstereotypic training and related correction processes on the application of stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 139–156.
24.
KawakamiK.DunnE.KarmaliF.DovidioJ. F. (2009). Mispredicting affective and behavioral responses to racism. Science, 323(5911), 276–278.
25.
KawakamiK.KarmaliF.VaccarinoE. (2019). Confronting intergroup bias: Predicted and actual responses to racism and sexism. In Confronting prejudice and discrimination (pp. 3–28). Academic Press.
26.
KendiI. X. (2023). How to be an antiracist. One World.
27.
KrakowM. M.YaleR. N.JensenJ. D.CarcioppoloN.RatcliffC. L. (2018). Comparing mediational pathways for narrative-and argument-based messages: Believability, counterarguing, and emotional reaction. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 299–321.
28.
KubinE.GrayK. J.von SikorskiC. (2023). Reducing political dehumanization by pairing facts with personal experiences. Political Psychology, 44(5), 1119–1140.
29.
LaCosseJ.KrusemarkD.FoltzJ.PlantE. A. (2023). Antiracism: Development and validation of a measure designed to identify White Americans who proactively fight to end discrimination toward Black Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 180–202.
30.
LaiC. K.LisnekJ. A. (2023). The impact of implicit-bias-oriented diversity training on police officers’ beliefs, motivations, and actions. Psychological Science, 34(4), 424–434.
31.
LegaultL.AmiotC. E. (2014). The role of autonomy in intergroup processes: Toward an integration of self-determination theory and intergroup approaches. In Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 159–190). Springer.
32.
LegaultL.Green-DemersI.GrantP.ChungJ. (2007). On the self-regulation of implicit and explicit prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 732–749.
33.
LegaultL.GutsellJ. N.InzlichtM. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1472–1477.
34.
LegaultL.PalmerP.ReynoldsM. (2025). Autonomy striving and antiracism: A twofold view of autonomy reveals distinct pathways to outgroup attitudes vs. action. Motivation and Emotion.
35.
MacInnisC. C.Page-GouldE. (2015). How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 307–327.
36.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Academic Press.
37.
PaluckE. L.GreenD. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367.
38.
PaluckE. L.PoratR.ClarkC. S.GreenD. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 533–560.
39.
PelletierL. G.SharpE. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self- determined motivation. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 210.
40.
PerryS. P.MurphyM. C.DovidioJ. F. (2015). Modern prejudice: Subtle, but unconscious? The role of Bias Awareness in Whites’ perceptions of personal and others’ biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 64–78.
41.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.
PhillsC. E.KawakamiK.TabiE.NadolnyD.InzlichtM. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 197.
44.
PieterseA. L.KirkinisK.PaikoL.MillerM. (2022). The anti-racism behavioral inventory: A validation study. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 14(2), 48–63.
45.
PieterseA. L.UtseyS. O.MillerM. J. (2016). Development and initial validation of the anti-racism behavioral inventory (ARBI). Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 356–381.
46.
PittinskyT. L.RosenthalS. A.MontoyaR. M. (2011a). Liking is not the opposite of disliking: The functional separability of positive and negative attitudes toward minority groups. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023806
47.
PittinskyT. L.RosenthalS. A.MontoyaR. M. (2011b). Measuring positive attitudes toward outgroups: Development and validation of the Allophilia Scale. In Moving beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 41–60). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12319-002
48.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
RothmanA. J.SaloveyP. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
51.
RyanR. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
52.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
53.
SimonovitsG.KezdiG.KardosP. (2018). Seeing the world through the other’s eye: An online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 186–193.
54.
SinghA. A. (2019). The racial healing handbook: Practical activities to help you challenge privilege, confront systemic racism, and engage in collective healing. New Harbinger Publications.
55.
StocksE. L.LishnerD. A.DeckerS. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior?European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649–665.
56.
TagkaloglouS.KasserT. (2018). Increasing collaborative, pro-environmental activism: The roles of Motivational Interviewing, self-determined motivation, and self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 58, 86–92.
57.
ThembaM. N. (2006). Talking the walk: A communications guide for racial justice. AK Press.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472.
60.
WrightS. C.LubenskyM. E. (2013). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In Intergroup misunderstandings (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press.
61.
YinY.WangY. (2023). Is empathy associated with more prosocial behaviour? A meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 3–22.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
