Four studies tested the hypotheses that system-justifying beliefs will be negatively associated with perspective-taking (PT) and empathic concern (EC) and this negative relationship will be exacerbated when system-justifying people encounter information that challenges system-justifying stereotypes. System justification and PT and EC were negatively associated at the dispositional level (Study 1). Experimentally increased PT decreased system justification through increased EC (Study 2) whereas experimentally increased system justification decreased PT and EC (Study 3). Moderation analyses indicated that when exposed to status-quo-inconsistent information (e.g., a Black vs. White person and/or a woman vs. man of high socioeconomic status), system-endorsing people were less likely to engage in PT (Study 4). There was no effect of system justification on actual helping behavior.
AzevedoF.JostJ. T.RothmundT. (2017). “Making America great again”: System justification in the U.S. presidential election of 2016. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000122
2.
BäckströmM.BjörklundF. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10
3.
BatsonC. D.BatsonJ. G.SlingsbyJ. K.HarrellK. L.PeeknaH. M.ToddR. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
4.
BatsonC. D.DuncanB. D.AckermanP.BuckleyT.BirchK. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
5.
BatsonC. D.DyckJ. L.BrandtJ. R.BatsonJ. G.PowellA. L.McMasterM. R.GriffittC. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
6.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
7.
BatsonC. D.ShawL. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
8.
BatsonC. D.TurkC. L.ShawL. L.KleinT. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other’s welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.300
9.
ButrusN.WitenbergR. T. (2013). Some personality predictors of tolerance to human diversity: The roles of openness, agreeableness, and empathy. Australian Psychologist, 48, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00081.x
10.
ChopikW. J.O’BrienE.KonrathS. H. (2016). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116673910
11.
CokeJ. S.BatsonC. D.McDavisK. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752
12.
CooleyE. C.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LeiR. F.CipolliW. (2019). Complex interactions of race and class: Among social liberals, learning about White privilege reduces sympathy, increases blame, and decreases external attributions for white people struggling with poverty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 2218–2228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000605
13.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
14.
DovidioJ. F.Ten VergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.…PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177
15.
EisenbergN.MillerP. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.101.1.91
16.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
GalinskyA. D.KuG.WangC. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124. doi/abs/10.1177/1368430205051060
19.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
20.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
21.
GoodmanD. J. (2000). Motivating people from privileged groups to support social justice. Teachers College Record, 102, 1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00092
22.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
23.
HealeyM. L.GrossmanM. (2018). Cognitive and affective perspective taking: Evidence for shared and dissociable anatomical substrates. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, Article 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00491
24.
HennesE. P.NamH. H.SternC.JostJ. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
25.
HoE. A.SanbonmatsuD. M.AkimotoS. A. (2002). The effects of comparative status on social stereotypes: How the perceived success of some persons affects the stereotypes of others. Social Cognition, 20, 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.1.36.20942
26.
HoffmanM. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
27.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
28.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
29.
JostJ. T.Chaikalis-PetritsisV.AbramsD.SidaniusJ.Van Der ToornJ.BrattC. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211422544
30.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
31.
JostJ. T.LiviatanI.van der ToornJ.LedgerwoodA.MandisodzaA.NosekB. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In KayA. C., et al. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (pp. 173–203). Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.Ni SullivanB. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127
33.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1.1.357.7560
34.
JostJ. T.van der ToornJ. (2012). System justification theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313–343). SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n42.
35.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
36.
KayA. C.JostJ. T.MandisodzaA. N.ShermanS. J.PetrocelliJ. V.JohnsonA. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequalityAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39006-5
37.
KluegelJ. R.SmithE. R. (1986). Social institutions and social change. Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Aldine de Gruyter.
38.
LucasB. J.KteilyN. S. (2018). (Anti-) egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 665–692doi:101037/pspa0000112.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
41.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
42.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226.
43.
SkorinkoJ. L.SinclairS. A. (2013). Perspective taking can increase stereotyping: The role of apparent stereotype confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 10–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.009
44.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.RichesonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022308
45.
ToiM.BatsonC. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.281
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163
48.
WakslakC. J.JostJ. T.TylerT. R.ChenE. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x
49.
WolffE. N. (1996). Top Heavy: The increasing inequality of wealth in America and what can be done about it. The New Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
