Using three large-scale longitudinal datasets collected from a cohort of university students over the span of 3 years (total N = 2,896 participants; ecological momentary assessments = 129,414), we found that engagement in meaningful social interactions with peers was associated with lower momentary loneliness and greater affective well-being. We also examined the role of four contextual factors (interaction partners, communication channels, places, and co-occurring activities) in explaining the relationships between meaningful social interactions and momentary well-being. Across samples, we found (a) participants reported experiencing greater loneliness and lower affective well-being after engaging in meaningful social interaction via computer-mediated channels (and via direct messaging in particular), compared to face-to-face, and (b) participants reported experiencing lower affective well-being after engaging in meaningful social interactions while dining and studying or working, compared to while resting. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the relationships between meaningful social interactions, momentary well-being, and contextual factors.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
Brajša-ŽganecA.MerkašM.ŠverkoI. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being?Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9724-2
3.
ChoiJ.CatapanoR.ChoiI. (2017). Taking stock of happiness and meaning in everyday life: An experience sampling approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678455
CowanH. R. (2019). Can a good life be unsatisfying? Within-person dynamics of life satisfaction and psychological well-being in late midlife. Psychological Science, 30(5), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831981
6.
CoxR. C.SterbaS. K.ColeD. A.UpenderR. P.OlatunjiB. O. (2018). Time of day effects on the relationship between daily sleep and anxiety: An ecological momentary assessment approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 111, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.008
7.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
8.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
9.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological methods, 12(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
10.
FarberS.NeutensT.CarrascoJ.-A.RojasC. (2014). Social interaction potential and the spatial distribution of face-to-face social interactions. Environment and Planning B, 41(6), 960–976. https://doi.org/10.1068/b120034p
11.
GrahamL. T.GoslingS. D.TravisC. K. (2015). The psychology of home environments: A call for research on residential space. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615576761
12.
HaaseK. R.CoscoT.KervinL.RiadiI.O’ConnellM. E. (2021). Older adults’ experiences with using technology for socialization during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Aging, 4(2), e28010. https://doi.org/10.2196/28010
13.
HanJ.PattersonI. (2007). An analysis of the influence that leisure experiences have on a person’s mood state, health and wellbeing. Annals of Leisure Research, 10(3–4), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2007.9686770
14.
KimH.KimG. J.ParkH. W.RiceR. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369.x
15.
KroenckeL.HarariG. M.BackM. D.WagnerJ. (2022). Well-being in social interactions: Examining personality-situation dynamics in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000422
16.
KuperN.KroenckeL.HarariG. M.DenissenJ. J. A. (2023). Who benefits from which activity? On the relations between personality traits, leisure activities, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000438
17.
LittE.ZhaoS.KrautR.BurkeM., (2020). What are meaningful social interactions in Today’s Media Landscape? A cross-cultural survey. Journal of Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942888
18.
MatudM. P.López-CurbeloM.FortesD. (2019). Gender and psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193531
19.
MeagherB. R. (2020). Ecologizing social psychology: The physical environment as a necessary constituent of social processes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319845938
20.
MehlM. R.VazireS.HolleranS. E.ClarkC. S. (2010). Eavesdropping on happiness: Well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations. Psychological Science, 21(4), 539–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362675
21.
MilekA.ButlerE. A.TackmanA. M.KaplanD. M.RaisonC. L.SbarraD. A.VazireS.MehlM. R. (2018). “Eavesdropping on happiness” revisited: A pooled, multisample replication of the association between life satisfaction and observed daily conversation quantity and quality. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774252
22.
MüllerS. R.PetersH.MatzS. C.WangW.HarariG. M. (2020). Investigating the relationships between mobility behaviours and indicators of subjective well-being using smartphone-based experience sampling and GPS tracking. European Journal of Personality, 34(5), 714–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2262
23.
OishiS.KooM.AkimotoS. (2008). Culture, interpersonal perceptions, and happiness in social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311198
24.
OldenburgR. (1998). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Marlowe.
25.
OnnelaJ.-P.DixonC.GriffinK.JaenickeT.MinowadaL.EsterkinS.SiuA.ZagorskyJ.JonesE. (2021). Beiwe: A data collection platform for high-throughput digital phenotyping. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(68), 3417. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03417
QuoidbachJ.TaquetM.DesseillesM.de MontjoyeY. A.GrossJ. J. (2019). Happiness and social behavior. Psychological Science, 30(8), 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619849666
28.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29(3), 363–381.
29.
RuppelE. K.GrossC.StollA.PeckB. S.AllenM.KimS. Y. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12179
30.
SandstromG. M.DunnE. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214529799
31.
SandstromG. M.LathiaN.MascoloC.RentfrowP. J. (2017). Putting mood in context: Using smartphones to examine how people feel in different locations. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 96–101.
32.
ScheibehenneB.JamilT.WagenmakersE.-J. (2016). Bayesian evidence synthesis can reconcile seemingly inconsistent results: The case of hotel towel reuse. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644081
33.
SiedleckiK. L.SalthouseT. A.OishiS.JeswaniS. (2014). The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across age. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0361-4
34.
SunJ.HarrisK.VazireS. (2020). Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1478–1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000272
35.
van der SchuurW. A.BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035
36.
VlahovicT. A.RobertsS.DunbarR. (2012). Effects of duration and laughter on subjective happiness within different modes of communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01584.x
37.
WebsterD.DunneL.HunterR. (2021). Association between social networks and subjective well-being in adolescents: A systematic review. Youth & Society, 53(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20919589
38.
YaremychH. E.PreacherK. J.HedekerD. (2021). Centering categorical predictors in multilevel models: Best practices and interpretation. Psychological Methods, 28(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000434
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
