When intimate partner violence occurs, both victims and perpetrators may justify the violence. However, efforts to understand justifying violence typically rely on written descriptions of violent acts or are assessed well after the violence has occurred. Do victims and perpetrators justify violence even while they see it happening? A novel paradigm addressed this question in two cross-sectional studies (Study 1, N = 535 and Study 2, N = 480). Using this paradigm, participants in the violent and non-violent relationships gave in-the-moment and continuous justification ratings (using a slider) as they watched video clip(s), each depicting a couple having a heated and violent fight. The results showed that participants who previously had experienced victimization or perpetration were more likely to justify the violence, both during and after watching the violent clips. This research provides new insights into the nature of violence justification and offers a novel paradigm for future studies.
ArriagaX. B.CapezzaN. M.DalyC. A. (2016). Personal standards for judging aggression by a relationship partner: How much aggression is too much?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000035
5.
ArriagaX. B.CapezzaN. M.GoodfriendW.AllsopK. E. (2018). The Invisible Harm of Downplaying a Romantic Partner’s Aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417754198
6.
BlackE.WorthH.ClarkeS.ObolJ. H.AkeraP.AworA.ShabitiM. S.FryH.RichmondR. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence against women in conflict affected northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study. Conflict and Health, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0219-8
7.
CadskyO.HansonR. K.CrawfordM.LalondeC. (1996). Attrition From a Male Batterer Treatment Program: Client-Treatment Congruence and Lifestyle Instability. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11.1.51
8.
CalveteE. (2008). Justification of Violence and Grandiosity Schemas as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1083–1095.
9.
CalveteE.Fernández-GonzálezL.OrueI.LittleT. D. (2018). Exposure to Family Violence and Dating Violence Perpetration in Adolescents: Potential Cognitive and Emotional Mechanisms. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000076
10.
CapaldiD. M.KnobleN. B.ShorttJ. W.KimH. K. (2012). A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 231–280. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.e4
11.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. US Department of Justice Violence Against Women Grants Office Electronic Resources.
12.
Fernández-GonzálezL.CalveteE.OrueI. (2017). The Acceptance of Dating Violence (ADV): Psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Psicothema, 29(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.229
13.
FollingstadD. R.HauseE. S.RutledgeL. L.PolekD. S. (1992). Effects of Battered Women’s Early Responses on Later Abuse Patterns. Violence and Victims, 7(2), 109–1992. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.7.2.109
14.
FunkJ. B.BaldacciH. B.PasoldT.BaumgardnerJ. (2004). Violence exposure in real-life, video games, television, movies, and the internet: Is there desensitization?Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.005
15.
GilbertS. E.GordonK. C. (2017). Predicting Forgiveness in Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence. Violence against Women, 23(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216644071
16.
GoelV.DolanR. J. (2003a). Reciprocal neural response within lateral and ventral medial prefrontal cortex during hot and cold reasoning. Neuroimage, 20(4), 2314–2321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.027
HardestyJ. L.CrossmanK. A.HaselschwerdtM. L.RaffaelliM.OgolskyB. G.JohnsonM. P. (2015). Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201
19.
HenningK.MartinssonR.HoldfordR. (2009). Gender differences in risk factors for intimate partner violence recidivism. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(6), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770903103248
HolmesE. A.MathewsA.MackintoshB.DalgleishT. (2008). The Causal Effect of Mental Imagery on Emotion Assessed Using Picture-Word Cues. Emotion, 8(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.395
22.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children’s Normative Beliefs about Aggression and Aggressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408
23.
JohnsonJ. D.EdwardsW.PagliaroS.LecciL. (2022). Sexualized Music Videos Desensitize Fijian Women to Intimate Partner Violence Suffering: The Mediating Role of Culpability Attributions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), NP14787–NP14806. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211015260
24.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Couples in Conflict: Classic Edition, 12(11), 1003–1018.
25.
KarremansJ. C.SchellekensM. P. J.KappenG. (2017). Bridging the Sciences of Mindfulness and Romantic Relationships: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315615450
KingsnorthR. (2006). Intimate Partner Violence: Predictors of Recidivism in a Sample of Arrestees. Violence against Women, 12(10), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293081
28.
Komnas Perempuan. (2022). Catatan Tahunan (Catahu) Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2021. Komnas Perempuan.
29.
LownE. A.VegaW. A. (2001). Intimate partner violence and health: Self-assessed health, chronic health, and somatic symptoms among Mexican American women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200105000-00004
30.
MaioG. R.ThomasG.FinchamF. D.CarnelleyK. B. (2008). Unraveling the Role of Forgiveness in Family Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.307
31.
MarzanaD.VecinaM. L.AlfieriS. (2016). The morality of men convicted of domestic violence: How it supports the maintenance of the moral self-concept. Violence and Victims, 31(6), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00143
32.
NeighborsC.WalkerD. D.MbilinyiL. F.ZegreeJ.FosterD. W.RoffmanR. A. (2013). A self-determination model of childhood exposure, perceived prevalence, justification, and perpetration of intimate partner violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01003.x
33.
NicholsonS. B.LutzD. J. (2017). The Importance of Cognitive Dissonance in Understanding and Treating Victims of Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 26(5), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1314989
34.
PessoaL.UngerleiderL. G. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli. Progress in Brain Research, 144(1995), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(03)14412-3
35.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
36.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
37.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
38.
ReyesH. L. M.FosheeV. A.FortsonB. L.ValleL. A.BreidingM. J.MerrickM. T. (2015). Longitudinal Mediators of Relations Between Family Violence and Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12200
39.
RuddleA.PinaA.VasquezE. (2017). Domestic violence offending behaviors: A review of the literature examining childhood exposure, implicit theories, trait aggression and anger rumination as predictive factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.016
40.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
41.
SalehinejadM. A.GhanavatiE.RashidM. H. A.NitscheM. A. (2021). Hot and cold executive functions in the brain: A prefrontal-cingular network. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 5, 239821282110077. https://doi.org/10.1177/23982128211007769
42.
SchumacherJ. A.Feldbau-KohnS.Smith SlepA. M.HeymanR. E. (2001). Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00027-6
43.
SchusterI.TomaszewskaP.GulP.RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2021). The role of moral neutralization of aggression and justification of violence against women in predicting physical teen dating violence perpetration and monitoring among adolescents in Switzerland. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 178, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20430
44.
ShenA. C. T.ChiuM. Y. L.GaoJ. (2012). Predictors of Dating Violence Among Chinese Adolescents: The Role of Gender-Role Beliefs and Justification of Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066–1089. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511424497
45.
SmithD. M.DonnellyJ. (2000). Adolescent Dating Violence: A Multi-Systemic Approach of Enhancing Awareness in Educators, Parents, and Society. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 21(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v21n01_04
46.
SpencerC.MorganP.BridgesJ.Washburn-BuskM.StithS. M. (2017). The Relationship Between Approval of Violence and Intimate Partner Violence in College Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517731315
47.
StithS. M.SmithD. B.PennC. E.WardD. B.TrittD. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001
48.
StöcklH.PenhaleB. (2015). Intimate Partner Violence and Its Association With Physical and Mental Health Symptoms Among Older Women in Germany. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(17), 3089–3111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554427
StrausM. A. (2017). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability (pp. 49-74). Routledge.
51.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactic Scales (CTS2) Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
52.
StrausM. A.SweetS. (1992). Verbal / Symbolic Aggression in Couples: Incidence Rates and Relationships to Personal Characteristics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(2), 346–357.
53.
TanK.ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2018). Running on empty: Measuring psychological dependence in close relationships lacking satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(7), 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517702010
54.
WalkerL. E. A. (2017). The Battered Woman Syndrome (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
ZelazoP. D.MullerU. (2002). Executive Function in Typical and Atypical Development. In GoswamiU. (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 445-469). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
