Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Intellectual humility involves awareness that one’s knowledge has limitations and that one’s beliefs might be incorrect. Despite documented benefits of intellectual humility, few studies have examined factors associated with long-term changes in intellectual humility. This study investigated whether an intervention focused on guided conversations was associated with increases in intellectual humility and whether these changes were stronger when people perceived greater affiliation with their conversation partner. Participants (N = 937) completed an intervention with four guided conversations and reported on their relationship with their partner after each conversation. Intellectual humility was measured before the first conversation, immediately after the last conversation, and 1 month following the last conversation. As hypothesized, intellectual humility increased over time, especially when people perceived greater affiliation with their conversation partner. These findings suggest that intellectual humility interventions with social components may have stronger effects when people perceive greater affiliation with their partners.

Keywords

intellectual humility conversation affiliation interpersonal perception interpersonal processes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Crockett

M. J.

(2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 769–771. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0213-3

Edwards

L. J.

Muller

K. E.

Wolfinger

R. D.

Qaqish

B. F.

Schabenberger

(2008). An R² statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27(29), 6137–6157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3429

Gordon

A. M.

Thorson

K. R.

(in press). Dealing with repeated measures: Design decisions and analytic strategies for over-time data. In Reis, H. T., West, T. V., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press.

Graham

Haidt

Koleva

Motyl

Iyer

Wojcik

S. P.

Ditto

P. H.

(2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Devine

Plant

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4

Hanel

P. H. P.

Roy

Taylor

Franjieh

Heffer Tanesini

Maio

G. R.

(2023). Using self-affirmation to increase intellectual humility in debate. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), Article 220958. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220958

Itzchakov

DeMarree

K. G.

Kluger

A. N.

Turjeman-Levi

(2018). The listener sets the tone: High-quality listening increases attitude clarity and behavior-intention consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5), 762–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217747874

Itzchakov

Kluger

A. N.

(2017). Can holding a stick improve listening at work? The effect of listening circles on employees’ emotions and cognitions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1351429

Itzchakov

Kluger

A. N.

Castro

D. R.

(2017). I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: The effect of high quality listening on speakers’ attitude ambivalence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675339

Itzchakov

Reis

H. T.

(2021). Perceived responsiveness increases tolerance of attitude ambivalence and enhances intentions to behave in an open-minded manner. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220929218

10.

Jarvinen

M. J.

Paulus

T. B.

(2017). Attachment and cognitive openness: Emotional underpinnings of intellectual humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167944

11.

Kalla

J. L.

Broockman

D. E.

(2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000923

12.

Koetke

Schumann

Porter

(2022). Intellectual humility predicts scrutiny of COVID-19 misinformation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620988242

13.

Kross

Grossmann

(2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024158

14.

Krueger

Meyer-Lindenberg

(2019). Toward a model of interpersonal trust drawn from neuroscience, psychology, and economics. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004

15.

Krumrei-Mancuso

E. J.

(2017). Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167938

16.

Krumrei-Mancuso

E. J.

Rouse

S. V.

(2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221.

17.

Lane

S. P.

Hennes

E. P.

(2018). Power struggles: Estimating sample size for multilevel relationships research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 7–31.

18.

Leary

M. R.

Diebels

K. J.

Davisson

E. K.

Jongman-Sereno

K. P.

Isherwood

J. C.

Raimi

K. T.

Deffler

S. A.

Hoyle

R. H.

(2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217697695

19.

Lehane

C. M.

Nielsen

Wittich

Langer

Dammeyer

(2018). Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self- and perceived partner acceptance. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(3), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12309

20.

McElroy

S. E.

Rice

K. G.

Davis

D. E.

Hook

J. N.

Hill

P. C.

Worthington

E. L.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

(2014). Intellectual humility: Scale development and theoretical elaborations in the context of religious leadership. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200103

21.

Meagher

Leman

Heidenga

Ringquist

Rowatt

(2020). Intellectual humility in conversation: Distinct behavioral indicators of self and peer ratings. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(2), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1738536

22.

Peetz

Grossmann

(2021). Wise reasoning about the future is associated with adaptive interpersonal feelings after relational challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 629–637.

23.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006

24.

Plato. (1871). Apology ( Jowett

, Trans.). In Dialogues of Plato. C. Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published 350 BCE)

25.

Porter

Elnakouri

Meyers

E. A.

Shibayama

Jayawickreme

Grossmann

(2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9

26.

Porter

Schumann

(2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861

27.

Reis

H. T.

Lee

K. Y.

O’Keefe

S. D.

Clark

M. S.

(2018). Perceived partner responsiveness promotes intellectual humility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.006

28.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Stafford

Hook

J. N.

Green

J. D.

Davis

D. E.

Johnson

K. A.

(2016). Humility attenuates negative attitudes and behaviors toward religious out-group members. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1037861

29.

Welker

K. M.

Duong Rakhshani

A. M.

Dieffenbach

Haidt

(2023). The online educational program “Perspectives” improves affective polarization, intellectual humility, and conflict management. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11(2), Article 10651.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

Increases in Intellectual Humility From Guided Conversations Are Greater When People Perceive Affiliation With Conversation Partners

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material