Andrew Carnegie was known for proclaiming that people have an obligation to leave their wealth to collective causes that benefit society. Yet, people tend to think of legacy within the constraints of their familial circles. In our work, we show that a simple reflection task that activates legacy motives can lead people to overcome this restricted way of construing legacy, expanding their circle of moral concern when considering how to allocate their wealth between different types of beneficiaries. Across four preregistered studies (N = 3,656), we found that when people are prompted to consider how their lives will impact future generations, they allocate more of their wealth to collectivistic beneficiaries (e.g., charities) and less of their wealth to relational beneficiaries (e.g., family members). We call this the “Andrew Carnegie Effect.”
AbbateC. S.IsgróA.WicklundR. A.BocaS. (2006). A field experiment on perspective-taking, helping, and self-awareness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(3), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2803_7
BangH. M.Zhou KovalC.Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2017). It’s the thought that counts over time: The interplay of intent, outcome, stewardship, and legacy motivations in intergenerational reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.006
4.
BeckerE. (1973). The denial of death. Free Press.
5.
BeckerE. (1975). Escape from evil. Free Press.
6.
CarnegieA. (1889). Wealth. North American Review, 148, 653–664.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Fourth report on human exposure to environmental chemicals, updated tables. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/
8.
ChenH.CohenP.ChenS. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383
9.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
10.
CioffiD.GarnerR. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296222003
11.
CrimstonC. R.BainP. G.HornseyM. J.BastianB. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086
12.
CrimstonC. R.BlessingS.GilbertP.KirbyJ. N. (2022). Fear leads to suffering: Fears of compassion predict restriction of the moral boundary. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12483
13.
CrimstonC. R.HornseyM. J.BainP. G.BastianB. (2018a). Moral expansiveness short form: Validity and reliability of the MESx. PLOS ONE, 13(10), Article e0205373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205373
14.
CrimstonC. R.HornseyM. J.BainP. G.BastianB. (2018b). Toward a psychology of moral expansiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730888
15.
FosgaardT.SoeteventA. R. (2018). Promises undone: How committed pledges impact donations to charity. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 2018/044-VII. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3173585
16.
FoxM.TostL. P.Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2010). The legacy motive: A catalyst for sustainable decision making in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020214
17.
FoxM.Wade-BenzoniK. (2017). The creation of opportunity is an opportunity to create: Entrepreneurship as an outlet for the legacy motive. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.003
18.
GeorgeG.Howard-GrenvilleJ.JoshiA.TihanyiL. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
20.
GrahamJ.WaytzA.MeindlP.IyerR.YoungL. (2017). Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle: Competing constraints on moral learning. Cognition, 167, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.001
21.
HamiltonW. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, Part I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.
22.
HarveyC.MacleanM.GordonJ.ShawE. (2011). Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Business History, 53(3), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2011.565516
23.
HershfieldH. E.GoldsteinD. G.SharpeW. F.FoxJ.YeykelisL.CarstensenL. L.BailensonJ. N. (2011). Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S23–S37. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S23
24.
JudgeD. S.HrdyS. B. (1992). Allocation of accumulated resources among close kin: Inheritance in Sacramento, California, 1890–1984. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(5–6), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90014-U
25.
KotreJ. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
KotreJ. (1999). Make it count. Free Press.
27.
KrausM. W.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Americans misperceive racial economic equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10324–10331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707719114
MatzS. C.GladstoneJ. J.StillwellD. (2017). In a world of big data, small effects can still matter: A reply to Boyce, Daly, Hounkpatin, and Wood (2017). Psychological Science, 28(4), 547–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617697445
RutchickA. M.SlepianM. L.ReyesM. O.PleskusL. N.HershfieldH. E. (2018). Future self-continuity is associated with improved health and increases exercise behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000153
StevermanB. (2019). Trillions will be inherited over the coming decades, further widening the wealth gap. L.A. Times, November 29.
35.
SuttonA. (2016). Measuring the effects of self-awareness: Construction of the Self-Awareness Outcomes Questionnaire. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1178
36.
van GelderJ.-L.HershfieldH. E.NordgrenL. F. (2013). Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science, 24(6), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612465197
37.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.SondakH.GalinskyA. D. (2010). Leaving a legacy: Intergenerational allocations of benefits and burdens. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 7–34.
38.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.TostL. P. (2009). The egoism and altruism of intergenerational behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309339317
39.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.TostL. P.HernandezM.LarrickR. P. (2012). It’s only a matter of time: Death, legacies, and intergenerational decisions. Psychological Science, 23(7), 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443967
40.
WeberE. P.KhademianA. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
41.
WebsterG. D. (2003). Prosocial behavior in families: Moderators of resource sharing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00055-6
42.
ZavalL.MarkowitzE. M.WeberE. U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614561266
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
