Is the certainty of saving a life today worth more than the less-certain possibility of saving 10 lives tomorrow? In six pre-registered studies with U.S. samples from Prolific (N = 5,095), we employed an intergenerational probability discounting task, discovering people discount the value of life as uncertainty and intergenerational distance from the present increase. Specifically, as uncertainty about impacting the future rises, individuals increasingly prioritize saving fewer present lives over more future lives, particularly for more distant future beneficiaries (Studies 1–2b). Experimental evidence (Studies 3a–4) suggests that certainty perceptions drive intergenerational concern, rather than the inverse. Drawing upon seminal research from cognitive science and behavioral economics, these findings address gaps in emerging social psychological inquiry into long-term intergenerational concern, shed light on mechanisms underlying debates on the ethical philosophy of longtermism, and highlight practical implications for decision-makers, stressing the need to increase certainty perceptions surrounding about pro-future actions to enhance intergenerational beneficence.
AddisD. R. (2020). Mental time travel? A neurocognitive model of event simulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00470-0
2.
AlganY.CohenD.DavoineE.FoucaultM.StantchevaS. (2021). Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40), e2108576118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108576118
Bo O’ConnorB.FowlerZ. (2023). How imagination and memory shape the moral mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 27(2), 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221114215
BulleyA.HenryJ.SuddendorfT. (2016). Prospection and the present moment: The role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000061
7.
BulleyA.MiloyanB.PepperG. V.GulloM. J.HenryJ. D.SuddendorfT. (2019). Cuing both positive and negative episodic foresight reduces delay discounting but does not affect risk-taking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(8), 1998–2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818819777
ColemanM.DeStenoD. (2024). Intertemporal empathy decline: Feeling less distress for future others’ suffering. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 24(8), 1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001402
10.
CraryA. (2023). The toxic ideology of longtermism. Radical Philosophy, 214, 49–57.
11.
CritchfieldT. S.KollinsS. H. (2001). Temporal discounting: Basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-101
12.
CropperM.AydedeS. K.PortneyP. R. (1992). Rates of time preference for saving lives. American Economic Review, 82(2), 469–472.
13.
D’ArgembeauA.Garcia JimenezC. (2020). The predictive validity of belief in future occurrence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1265–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3708
14.
DoyleE. E. H.ThompsonJ.HillS.WilliamsM.PatonD.HarrisonS.BostromA.BeckerJ. (2023). Where does scientific uncertainty come from, and from whom? Mapping perspectives of natural hazards science advice. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 96, 103948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103948
EverettJ. A. C.FaberN. S.SavulescuJ.CrockettM. J. (2018). The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.004
17.
FishburnP. C. (1981). Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories. Theory and Decision, 13(2), 139–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134215
FrederickS. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022298223127
20.
GaesserB.FowlerZ. (2020). Episodic simulation of prosocial interaction: Investigating the roles of memory and imagination in facilitating a willingness to help others. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000232
21.
GershonR.FridmanA. (2022). Individuals prefer to harm their own group rather than help an opposing group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(49), e2215633119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215633119
GreenL.MyersonJ.VanderveldtA. (2014). Delay and probability discounting. In The Wiley Blackwell handbook of operant and classical conditioning (pp. 307–337). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468135.ch13
25.
GreeneJ. D.CushmanF. A.StewartL. E.LowenbergK.NystromL. E.CohenJ. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001
26.
HauserO. P.RandD. G.PeysakhovichA.NowakM. A. (2014). Cooperating with the future. Nature, 511(7508), Article 7508. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13530
27.
HillP. F.YiR.SprengR. N.DianaR. A. (2017). Neural congruence between intertemporal and interpersonal self-control: Evidence from delay and social discounting. NeuroImage, 162, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.071
JonesB. A. (2022). A review of social discounting: The impact of social distance on altruism. The Psychological Record, 72(3), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00488-5
30.
JonesB. A.RachlinH. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-61
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
33.
KargerE.AtanasovP. D.TetlockP. (2022). Improving judgments of existential risk: Better forecasts, questions, explanations, policies (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4001628). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4001628
34.
LawK. F.CampbellD.GaesserB. (2022). Biased benevolence: The perceived morality of effective altruism across social distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48, 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211002773
35.
LawK. F.SyropoulosS.ColemanM.GainsburgI.O’ConnorB. B. (2024). Moral future-thinking: Does the moral circle stand the test of time?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241284324
36.
LawK. F.SyropoulosS.ColemanM.YoungL. (2025). A future beyond ourselves: Self-oriented prospection predicts increased intergenerational responsibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 233, 112915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112915
37.
LiuB. S.DittoP. H. (2013). What dilemma? Moral evaluation shapes factual belief. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612456045
MartínezE.WinterC. (2023). The intuitive appeal of legal protection for future generations (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4349899). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4349899
40.
MatanggaranV. (2017, November21). Explaining risk perception of climate change in Indonesia through cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance, collectivism and long-term orientation [Master thesis]. University of Twente. https://essay.utwente.nl/74209/
41.
McManusR. M.Kleiman-WeinerM.YoungL. (2020). What we owe to family: The impact of special obligations on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 31(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619900321
42.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2022). Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture with World Values Survey items and scores for 102 countries. Journal of International Management, 28(4), 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100971
OrwigW.SettonR.DiezI.BueichekúE.MeyerM. L.TamirD. I.SepulcreJ.SchacterD. L. (2023). Creativity at rest: Exploring functional network connectivity of creative experts. Network Neuroscience, 7, 1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00317
48.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
49.
SyropoulosS.LawK. F.Kraft-ToddG.YoungL. (2023). Impartial intergenerational beneficence: The psychology of feeling (equal) intergenerational concern for all future generations. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e34kv
50.
SyropoulosS.LawK. F.YoungL. (2024a). Caring for present and future generations alike: Longtermism and moral regard across temporal and social distance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 27(8), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241242115
51.
SyropoulosS.LawK. F.YoungL. (2024b). The case for longtermism: Concern for the far future as a catalyst for pro-climate action. npj Climate Action, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00110-8
52.
SyropoulosS.LawK. F.YoungL. (2025). Longtermist education interventions increase concern for and action to protect future generations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 16(4), 433–443https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241228465
53.
TerpiniM.D’ArgembeauA. (2024). Uncertainty salience reduces the accessibility of episodic future thoughts. Psychological Research, 88(4), 1399–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01962-9
54.
TuenY. J.BulleyA.PalomboD. J.O’ConnorB. B. (2023). Social value at a distance: Higher identification with all of humanity is associated with reduced social discounting. Cognition, 230, 105283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105283
55.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2008). Maple trees and weeping willows: The role of time, uncertainty, and affinity in intergenerational decisions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1(3), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00014.x
60.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.TostL. P. (2009). The egoism and altruism of intergenerational behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309339317
61.
WeinsteinN. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
