Social Connectedness Promotes Robot Anthropomorphism

Abstract

Anthropomorphism has traditionally been viewed as a means to compensate for a lack of social connection; therefore, social deficits are considered to facilitate anthropomorphism. In this research, we adopted an alternative growth-oriented perspective of anthropomorphism. We posited that anthropomorphism operates as a means to explore the social world, and thus hypothesized that social connectedness promotes robot anthropomorphism. To test this hypothesis, we conducted three studies (total N = 599) examining the effect of social connectedness on robot anthropomorphism. We found that social connectedness increased robot anthropomorphism. Importantly, genuine interest in social interactions with robots accounted for this effect. In addition, anthropomorphism elicited by social connectedness predicted more favorable attitudes toward robots. These findings enrich the current understanding of anthropomorphism and have practical implications.

Keywords

anthropomorphism social connectedness sociality motivation human–robot relationships open practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arora

A. S.

Fleming

Arora

Taras

(2021). Finding “H” in HRI: Examining human personality traits, robotic anthropomorphism, and robot likeability in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 17(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIIT.2021010102

Bartneck

Keijsers

(2020). The morality of abusing a robot. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0017

Bartz

J. A.

Tchalova

Fenerci

(2016). Reminders of social connection can attenuate anthropomorphism: A replication and extension of Epley, Akalis, Waytz, and Cacioppo (2008). Psychological Science, 27(12), 1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616668510

Bastian

Haslam

(2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Brown

C. M.

Hengy

S. M.

McConnell

A. R.

(2016). Thinking about cats or dogs provides relief from social rejection. Anthrozoös, 29(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2015.1067958

Caruana

White

R. C.

Remington

(2021). Autistic traits and loneliness in autism are associated with increased tendencies to anthropomorphize. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(7), 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211005694

Coeckelbergh

(2021). Three responses to anthropomorphism in social robotics: Towards a critical, relational, and hermeneutic approach. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14, 2049–2061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00770-0

Dang

Liu

(2022). Does connectedness need satisfaction diminish or promote social goal striving? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221084539

10.

Dang

Liu

(2023). Do lonely people seek robot companionship? A comparative examination of the loneliness–robot anthropomorphism link in the United States and China. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, Article 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107637

11.

DeWall

C. N.

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

(2008). Satiated with connectedness? Effects of acceptance, rejection, and task framing on self-regulatory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012632

12.

Epley

Akalis

Waytz

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2008a). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x

13.

Epley

Waytz

Akalis

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2008b). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143

14.

Epley

Waytz

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

15.

Eyssel

Reich

(2013). Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots): On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 121–122). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483531.

16.

Feeney

B. C.

Cassidy

Ramos-Marcuse

(2008). The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: Predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012635

17.

Feeney

B. C.

Collins

N. L.

(2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222

18.

Gamez-Djokic

Waytz

(2020). Concerns about automation and negative sentiment toward immigration. Psychological Science, 31(8), 987–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620929977

19.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), Article 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475

20.

Haslam

(2022). Dehumanization and the lack of social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.013

21.

Jung

Kim

Lee

S. H.

(2022). The impact of belongingness and graphic-based emoticon usage motives on emoticon purchase intentions for MIM: An analysis of Korean KakaoTalk users. Online Information Review, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2020-0036

22.

Kaplan

A. D.

Sanders

Hancock

P. A.

(2019). The relationship between extroversion and the tendency to anthropomorphize robots: A Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, Article 135. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00135

23.

Kaplan

(2004). Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1(03), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219843604000289

24.

Karlsson

(2012). Critical anthropomorphism and animal ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9349-8

25.

Kunstman

J. W.

Plant

E. A.

Zielaskowski

Lacosse

(2013). Feeling in with the outgroup: Outgroup acceptance and the internalization of the motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033082

26.

Kwok

Grisham

J. R.

Norberg

M. M.

(2018). Object attachment: Humanness increases sentimental and instrumental values. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 1132–1142. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.98

27.

Lavigne

G. L.

Vallerand

R. J.

Crevier-Braud

(2011). The fundamental need to belong on the distinction between growth and deficit-reduction orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405995

28.

Lee

R. M.

Draper

Lee

(2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310

29.

Zhang

Wang

(2020). Be close or stay away: The interactive effect of loneliness and information frameworks on consumer’s anthropomorphic product preference. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 3(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-12-2019-0047

30.

Magni

Taylor

M. S.

Venkatesh

(2010). “To play or not to play”: A cross-temporal investigation using hedonic and instrumental perspectives to explain user intentions to explore a technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(9), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004

31.

Manfredo

M. J.

Urquiza

Don Carlos

A. W.

Bruskotter

J. T.

Dietsch

A. M.

(2020). How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation, 241, Article 108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108297

32.

McConnell

A. R.

Brown

C. M.

Shoda

T. M.

Stayton

L. E.

Martin

C. E.

(2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024506

33.

Mende

Scott

M. L.

van Doorn

Grewal

Shanks

(2019). Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718822827

34.

Merrill

Kim

Collins

(2022). AI companions for lonely individuals and the role of social presence. Communication Research Reports, 39(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2045929

35.

Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.97

36.

Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(2020). Broaden-and-build effects of contextually boosting the sense of attachment security in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419885997

37.

Mourey

J. A.

Olson

J. G.

Yoon

(2017). Products as pals: Engaging with anthropomorphic products mitigates the effects of social exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx038

38.

Nielsen

Y. A.

Pfattheicher

Keijsers

(2022). Prosocial behavior toward machines. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.004

39.

Roesler

Manzey

Onnasch

(2021). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Science Robotics, 6(58), Article eabj5425. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425

40.

Ruijten

P. A.

Ham

Midden

C. J.

(2014). Investigating the influence of social exclusion on persuasion by a virtual agent. In International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 191–200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_17.

41.

Scheutz

(2011). The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In Lin

Bekey

Abney

(Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 205–221). MIT Press.

42.

Sedikides

Wildschut

(2020). The motivational potency of nostalgia: The future is called yesterday. Advances in Motivation Science, 7, 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.001

43.

Sedikides

Wildschut

Routledge

Arndt

Hepper

E. G.

Zhou

(2015). To nostalgize: Mixing memory with affect and desire. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 189–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.10.001

44.

Sheldon

K. M.

Abad

Hinsch

(2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022407

45.

Shin

H. I.

Kim

(2020). My computer is more thoughtful than you: Loneliness, anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Psychology, 39, 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9975-7

46.

Swickert

R. J.

Rosentreter

C. J.

Hittner

J. B.

Mushrush

J. E.

(2002). Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(5), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00093-9

47.

Szalma

J. L.

(2014). On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human–technology interaction. Human Factors, 56(8), 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814553471

48.

Turner

R. N.

Wildschut

Sedikides

(2012). Dropping the weight stigma: Nostalgia improves attitudes toward persons who are overweight. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.007

49.

Turner

R. N.

Wildschut

Sedikides

(2018). Fighting ageism through nostalgia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2317

50.

Twenge

J. M.

Baumeister

R. F.

DeWall

C. N.

Ciarocco

N. J.

Bartels

J. M.

(2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56

51.

van Pinxteren

M. M.

Wetzels

R. W.

Rüger

Pluymaekers

Wetzels

(2019). Trust in humanoid robots: Implications for services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0045

52.

Wan

E. W.

Chen

R. P.

(2021). Anthropomorphism and object attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.009

53.

Waytz

Cacioppo

Epley

(2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336

54.

Waytz

Epley

(2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.012

55.

Wildschut

Sedikides

Arndt

Routledge

(2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975

56.

Wynne

(2004). The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature, 428, Article 606. https://doi.org/10.1038/428606a

57.

Zhang

Chan

D. K. S.

Teng

Zhang

(2015). Sense of interpersonal security and preference for harsh actions against others: The role of dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.014

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB