Sensory processing sensitivity is an individual difference that captures the extent to which people show heightened emotional reactivity to, and increased cognitive processing of, their environment. Although central to its definition, there has been no research examining whether highly sensitive individuals display stronger reactivity to naturally occurring negative and positive events in everyday life. We addressed this gap by carrying out a 21-day online diary study with 239 participants, varying in sensory processing sensitivity, who reported their daily life-satisfaction, affective experiences, and self-esteem along with appraisals of the most negative and positive events of the day. Multilevel analyses demonstrated that individuals higher in sensory processing sensitivity showed greater reactivity to more subjectively intense negative events, but no difference in their reactivity to positive events. These findings provide initial insights into how sensory processing sensitivity manifests in daily emotional reactivity with greater reactivity to negative events in our study.
AcevedoB. P.AronE. N.AronA.SangsterM. D.CollinsN.BrownL. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4(4), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.242
2.
AronE. N. (2001). The highly sensitive person in love: Understanding and managing relationships when the world overwhelms you. Harmony.
3.
AronE. N. (2011). Psychotherapy and the highly sensitive person: Improving outcomes for that minority of people who are the majority of clients. Routledge.
4.
AronE. N. (2013). The highly sensitive person. Kensington Publishing Corp.
5.
AronE. N.AronA. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
6.
AronE. N.AronA.DaviesK. M. (2005). Adult shyness: The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271419
7.
AronE. N.AronA.JagiellowiczJ. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
8.
AssaryE.ZavosH.KrapohlE.KeersR.PluessM. (2021). Genetic architecture of environmental sensitivity reflects multiple heritable components: A twin study with adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(9), 4896–4904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0783-8
9.
BakkerK.MouldingR. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity, dispositional mindfulness and negative psychological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.006
BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x
12.
BelskyJ.ZhangX.SaylerK. (2022). Differential susceptibility 2.0: Are the same children affected by different experiences and exposures?Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420002205
13.
BenhamG. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1433–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021
14.
BlackB. A.KernM. L. (2020). A qualitative exploration of individual differences in wellbeing for highly sensitive individuals. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0482-8
15.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
16.
BoothC.StandageH.FoxE. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.020
17.
BrindleK.MouldingR.BakkerK.NedeljkovicM. (2015). Is the relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity and negative affect mediated by emotional regulation?Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 214–221.
18.
CarrM.MatthewsE.WilliamsJ.BlagroveM. (2021). Testing the theory of differential susceptibility to nightmares: The interaction of sensory processing sensitivity with the relationship of low mental wellbeing to nightmare frequency and nightmare distress. Journal of Sleep Research, 30(3), e13200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13200
19.
CassilA. (2020). The empowered highly sensitive person. Rockridge Press.
20.
ChangV. T.OverallN. C. (2022). Biased memories contribute to the links between stress and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 22(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001027
21.
ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
22.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T.BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary- neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611
23.
EversA.RascheJ.SchabracqM. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189
24.
GrevenC. U.HombergJ. R. (2020). Sensory processing sensitivity—For better or for worse? Theory, evidence, and societal implications. In AcevedoB. P. (Ed.), The highly sensitive brain (pp. 51–74). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818251-2.00003-5
25.
GrevenC. U.LionettiF.BoothC.AronE. N.FoxE.SchendanH. E.PluessM.BruiningH.AcevedoB.BijttebierP.HombergJ. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
26.
GrimenH. L.DisethÅ. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity: Factors of the highly sensitive person scale and their relationships to personality and subjective health complaints. Comprehensive Psychology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165222816660077
27.
GrossJ. J.SuttonS. K.KetelaarT. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298243005
28.
HombergJ. R.SchubertD.AsanE.AronE. N. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity and serotonin gene variance: Insights into mechanisms shaping environmental sensitivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.029
29.
IimuraS. (2021). Highly sensitive adolescents: The relationship between weekly life events and weekly socioemotional well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 112(4), 1103–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12505
30.
IimuraS.KibeC. (2020). Highly sensitive adolescent benefits in positive school transitions: Evidence for vantage sensitivity in Japanese high-schoolers. Developmental Psychology, 56(8), 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000991
31.
JaegerB. S. (2005). Making work work for the highly sensitive person. Mcgraw-Hill Education.
32.
KalokerinosE. K.ErbasY.CeulemansE.KuppensP. (2019). Differentiate to regulate: Low negative emotion differentiation is associated with ineffective use but not selection of emotion-regulation strategies. Psychological Science, 30(6), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619838763
33.
KeersR.ColemanJ. R.LesterK. J.RobertsS.BreenG.ThastumM.BögelsS.SchneiderS.·HeiervangE.Meiser-StedmanR.NautaM.CreswellC.ThirlwallK.RapeeR. M.HudsonJ. L.LewisC.PlominR.EleyT. C. (2016). A genome-wide test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis reveals a genetic predictor of differential response to psychological treatments for child anxiety disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444023
34.
LefkowitzA. (2020). The highly sensitive person’s toolkit. Rockridge Press.
35.
LionettiF.AronA.AronE. N.BurnsG. L.JagiellowiczJ.PluessM. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6
36.
LionettiF.AronE. N.AronA.KleinD. N.PluessM. (2019). Observer-rated environmental sensitivity moderates children’s response to parenting quality in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2389–2402. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000795
37.
LionettiF.PastoreM.MoscardinoU.NocentiniA.PluessK.PluessM. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013
38.
LissM.MaillouxJ.ErchullM. J. (2008). The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.009
39.
LissM.TimmelL.BaxleyK.KillingsworthP. (2005). Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(8), 1429–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007
LynnP. (2001). The impact of incentives on response rates to personal interview surveys: Role and perceptions of interviewers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.3.326
42.
MurayamaK.UsamiS.SakakiM. (2020, May11). A simple and easy method for power analysis in mixed-effects modelling with nested data: Just a t value often suffices. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6cer3
43.
NeubauerA. B.ScottS. B.SliwinskiM. J.SmythJ. M. (2020). How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000248
44.
NocentiniA.MenesiniE.PluessM. (2018). The personality trait of environmental sensitivity predicts children’s positive response to school-based antibullying intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618782194
45.
OishiS.DienerE.ChoiD. W.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiI. (2007). The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: When less is more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.685
46.
PluessM. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120
47.
PluessM.BelskyJ. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030196
48.
PluessM.BoniwellI. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of vantage sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011
49.
PluessM.LionettiF.AronE. N.AronA. (2020). People differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An integrated theory and empirical evidence. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w53yc
50.
RevelleW.RevelleM. W. (2015). Package ‘psych’. The Comprehensive R Archive Network, 337, 338.
51.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
52.
RobinsonM. D. (2007). Personality, affective processing, and self-regulation: Toward process-based views of extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00019.x
53.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934
54.
SawyerH. (2013). Highly sensitive people: Guide to survive overwhelming relationships. The Heidi Sawyer Group.
55.
SchroeversM. J.BrandsmaR. (2010). Is learning mindfulness associated with improved affect after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy?British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X424195
56.
SlagtM.DubasJ. S.van AkenM. A.EllisB. J.DekovićM. (2018). Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000431
57.
SmolewskaK. A.McCabeS. B.WoodyE. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five.”Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022
58.
SulsJ.MartinR. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1485–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x
59.
TsaiJ. L.KnutsonB.FungH. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 90(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288
60.
ZeffT. (2004). The highly sensitive person’s survival guide: Essential skills for living well in an overstimulating world. New Harbinger Publications.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
