Although much is known about people’s attempts to cope with stressors, unmeasured heterogeneity in these stressors has made it difficult to assess the effectiveness of coping attempts. We remedied this problem by focusing on coping effectiveness in people preparing for a major, planned, uniform stressor, the Bar Examination. Within-person analyses of longitudinal data on anxiety in 321 persons over 35 days provided evidence on (a) coping effectiveness for the typical person, (b) how effectiveness changed across time, and (c) the extent to which individuals differed in their effectiveness. For the typical person, active coping and positive reinterpretation on one day were associated with reduced anxiety the next morning, whereas practical support seeking, venting, and mental disengagement were associated with increased anxiety. The effectiveness of planning, acceptance, and disengagement varied as a function of time to the stressful event. Finally, there were large individual differences in coping effectiveness across the sample.
AffleckG.TennenH.KeefeF. J.LefebvreJ. C.Kashikar-ZuckS.WrightK.. . . CaldwellD. S. (1999). Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood and coping. Pain, 83, 601-609. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0
2.
AnoG. G.VasconcellesE. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 461-480. doi:10.1002/jclp.20049
3.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
4.
BarreraM.BacaL. M. (1990). Recipient reactions to social support: Contributions of enacted support, conflicted support and network orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 541-551. doi:10.1177/0265407590074010
5.
BayramN.BilgelN. (2008). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety and stress among a group of university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43, 667-672. doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0345-x
6.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458-475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
7.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
8.
BolgerN.EckenrodeJ. (1991). Social relationships, personality and anxiety during a major stressful event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 440-449. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.440
9.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890
10.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
11.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
12.
ChristensenA. J.BenotschE. G.WiebeJ. S.LawtonW. J. (1995). Coping with treatment-related stress: Effects on patient adherence in hemodialysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 454-459. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.454
13.
CohenS.SymeS. L. (1985). Social support and health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14.
Connor-SmithJ. K.FlachsbartC. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080-1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080
15.
ConwayV. J.TerryD. J. (1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 1-7.
16.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917-929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
17.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583-619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
18.
DeLongisA.HemphillK. J.LehmanD. R. (1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology, 2, 83-109.
19.
DeLongisA.PreeceM. (2003). Emotional and relational consequences of coping in stepfamilies. Marriage & Family Review, 34, 115-138. doi:10.1300/J002v34n01_06
20.
DiMatteoM. R. (2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis.
21.
FinchJ. F.BarreraM.Jr.OkunM. A.BryantW. H. M.PoolG. J.Snow-TurekA. (1997). The factor structure of received social support: Dimensionality and the prediction of depression and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 323-342. doi:10.1521/jscp.1997.16.3.323
22.
ForsytheC. J.CompasB. E. (1987). Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 473-485. doi:10.1007/BF01175357
23.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of health and social behavior, 219-239.
24.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150
25.
FolkmanS.MoskowitzJ. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
26.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM.ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824-838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.824
27.
GreenA. S.RafaeliE.BolgerN.ShroutP. E.ReisH. T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87-105. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87
28.
IidaM.SeidmanG.ShroutP. E.FujitaK.BolgerN. (2008). Modeling support provision in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 460-478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.460
29.
KeselmanH. J.MillerC. W.HollandB. (2011). Many tests of significance: New methods for controlling type I errors. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 420.
30.
KesslerR. C.PriceR. H.WortmanC. B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531-572. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002531
31.
LazarusR. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665-673. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.665
32.
LazarusR. S.DeLongisA. (1983). Psychological stress and coping in aging. American Psychologist, 38, 245-254. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.3.245
33.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer.
34.
MarcoC. A.NealeJ. M.SchwartzJ. E.ShiffmanS.StoneA. A. (1999). Coping with daily events and short-term mood changes: An unexpected failure to observe effects of coping. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 755-764. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.755
35.
McNairD. M.LorrM.DropplemannL. F. (1992). EDITS manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
36.
MorlingB.EveredS. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 269-296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.269
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 504-511. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504
39.
ParkC. L.ArmeliS.TennenH. (2004). Appraisal-coping goodness of fit: A daily internet study. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 558-569. doi:10.1177/0146167203262855
40.
ParkC. L.CohenL. H. (1993). Religious and nonreligious coping with the death of a friend. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 561-577. doi:10.1007/BF01176079
41.
PearsonR. W.RossM. A.DawesR. M. (1992). Personal recall and the limits of retrospective questions in surveys. In TanurJ. M. (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 65-94). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
42.
PorterL. S.MarcoC. A.SchwartzJ. E.NealeJ. M.ShiffmanS.StoneA. A. (2000). Gender differences in coping: A comparison of trait and momentary assessments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 480-498. doi:10.1521/jscp.2000.19.4.480
43.
PtacekJ. T.SmithR. E.EspeK.RaffetyB. (1994). Limited correspondence between daily coping reports and restrospective coping recall. Psychological Assessment, 6, 41-49. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.1.41
44.
RaffetyB. D.SmithR. E.PtacekJ. T. (1997). Facilitating and debilitating trait anxiety, situational anxiety, and coping with an anticipated stressor: A process analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(4), 892.
45.
RafaeliE.GleasonM. E. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(1), 20-37.
46.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010
47.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
RegehrC.GlancyD.PittsA. (2013). Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.026
49.
RothS.CohenL. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American psychologist, 41(7), 813.
50.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ. R.SnyderS. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5
51.
SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.GurungR. A. R. (1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
52.
SchwarzN.GrovesR. M.SchumanH. (1998). Survey methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
53.
SeyboldK. S.HillP. C. (2001). The role of religion and spirituality in mental and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 21-24. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00106
54.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN.IidaM.BurkeC. T.GleasonM. E. J.LaneS. P. (2010). The effects of daily support transactions during acute stress: Results form a diary study of bar exam preparation. In SullivanK. T.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 175-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
ShroutP. E.HermanC. M.BolgerN. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13, 115-134. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.x
56.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
SkinnerE. A.EdgeK.AltmanJ.SherwoodH. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216-269. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
58.
SomerfieldM. R.McCraeR. R. (2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. American Psychologist, 55, 620-625. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.620
59.
StoneA. A.Kennedy-MooreE.NealeJ. M. (1995). Association between daily coping and end-of-day mood. Health Psychology, 14, 341-349. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.4.341
60.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.NealeJ. M.ShiffmanS.MarcoC. A.HickcoxM.. . . CruiseL. J. (1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1670-1680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1670
61.
TennenH.AffleckG.ArmeliS.CarneyM. A. (2000). A daily process approach to coping: Linking theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 55, 626-636. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.626
62.
TixA. P.FrazierP. A. (2005). Mediation and moderation of the relationship between intrinsic religiousness and mental health. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 295-306. doi:10.1177/0146167204271592
63.
ToddM.TennenH.CarneyM. A.ArmeliS.AffleckG. (2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310-319. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310
64.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
65.
VitalianoP. P.DeWolfeD. J.MaiuroR. D.RussoJ.KatonW. (1990). Appraised changeability of a stressor as a modifier of the relationship between coping and depression: A test of the hypothesis of fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 582-592. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.582
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
