The Influence of Daily Coping on Anxiety Under Examination Stress: A Model of Interindividual Differences in Intraindividual Change

Abstract

Although much is known about people’s attempts to cope with stressors, unmeasured heterogeneity in these stressors has made it difficult to assess the effectiveness of coping attempts. We remedied this problem by focusing on coping effectiveness in people preparing for a major, planned, uniform stressor, the Bar Examination. Within-person analyses of longitudinal data on anxiety in 321 persons over 35 days provided evidence on (a) coping effectiveness for the typical person, (b) how effectiveness changed across time, and (c) the extent to which individuals differed in their effectiveness. For the typical person, active coping and positive reinterpretation on one day were associated with reduced anxiety the next morning, whereas practical support seeking, venting, and mental disengagement were associated with increased anxiety. The effectiveness of planning, acceptance, and disengagement varied as a function of time to the stressful event. Finally, there were large individual differences in coping effectiveness across the sample.

Keywords

coping emotions multilevel modeling daily diary studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Affleck

Tennen

Keefe

F. J.

Lefebvre

J. C.

Kashikar-Zuck

Wright

. . . Caldwell

D. S.

(1999). Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood and coping. Pain, 83, 601-609. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0

Ano

G. G.

Vasconcelles

E. B.

(2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 461-480. doi:10.1002/jclp.20049

Bandura

(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Barrera

Baca

L. M.

(1990). Recipient reactions to social support: Contributions of enacted support, conflicted support and network orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 541-551. doi:10.1177/0265407590074010

Bayram

Bilgel

(2008). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety and stress among a group of university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43, 667-672. doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0345-x

Bolger

Amarel

(2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458-475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458

Bolger

Davis

Rafaeli

(2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Bolger

Eckenrode

(1991). Social relationships, personality and anxiety during a major stressful event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 440-449. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.440

Bolger

Zuckerman

(1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890

10.

Bolger

Zuckerman

Kessler

R. C.

(2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953

11.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

Weintraub

J. K.

(1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267

12.

Christensen

A. J.

Benotsch

E. G.

Wiebe

J. S.

Lawton

W. J.

(1995). Coping with treatment-related stress: Effects on patient adherence in hemodialysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 454-459. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.454

13.

Cohen

Syme

S. L.

(1985). Social support and health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

14.

Connor-Smith

J. K.

Flachsbart

(2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080-1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080

15.

Conway

V. J.

Terry

D. J.

(1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 1-7.

16.

Cranford

J. A.

Shrout

P. E.

Iida

Rafaeli

Yip

Bolger

(2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917-929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721

17.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583-619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356

18.

DeLongis

Hemphill

K. J.

Lehman

D. R.

(1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology, 2, 83-109.

19.

DeLongis

Preece

(2003). Emotional and relational consequences of coping in stepfamilies. Marriage & Family Review, 34, 115-138. doi:10.1300/J002v34n01_06

20.

DiMatteo

M. R.

(2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis.

21.

Finch

J. F.

Barrera

Jr. Okun

M. A.

Bryant

W. H. M.

Pool

G. J.

Snow-Turek

(1997). The factor structure of received social support: Dimensionality and the prediction of depression and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 323-342. doi:10.1521/jscp.1997.16.3.323

22.

Forsythe

C. J.

Compas

B. E.

(1987). Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 473-485. doi:10.1007/BF01175357

23.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of health and social behavior, 219-239.

24.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150

25.

Folkman

Moskowitz

J. T.

(2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456

26.

Gleason

M. E. J.

Iida

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

(2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824-838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.824

27.

Green

A. S.

Rafaeli

Bolger

Shrout

P. E.

Reis

H. T.

(2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87-105. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87

28.

Iida

Seidman

Shrout

P. E.

Fujita

Bolger

(2008). Modeling support provision in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 460-478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.460

29.

Keselman

H. J.

Miller

C. W.

Holland

(2011). Many tests of significance: New methods for controlling type I errors. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 420.

30.

Kessler

R. C.

Price

R. H.

Wortman

C. B.

(1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531-572. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002531

31.

Lazarus

R. S.

(2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665-673. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.665

32.

Lazarus

R. S.

DeLongis

(1983). Psychological stress and coping in aging. American Psychologist, 38, 245-254. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.3.245

33.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer.

34.

Marco

C. A.

Neale

J. M.

Schwartz

J. E.

Shiffman

Stone

A. A.

(1999). Coping with daily events and short-term mood changes: An unexpected failure to observe effects of coping. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 755-764. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.755

35.

McNair

D. M.

Lorr

Dropplemann

L. F.

(1992). EDITS manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

36.

Morling

Evered

(2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 269-296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.269

37.

National Conference of Bar Examiners. (2012). 2012 statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ncbex.org/dmsdocument/145

38.

Nolen-Hoeksema

(2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 504-511. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504

39.

Park

C. L.

Armeli

Tennen

(2004). Appraisal-coping goodness of fit: A daily internet study. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 558-569. doi:10.1177/0146167203262855

40.

Park

C. L.

Cohen

L. H.

(1993). Religious and nonreligious coping with the death of a friend. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 561-577. doi:10.1007/BF01176079

41.

Pearson

R. W.

Ross

M. A.

Dawes

R. M.

(1992). Personal recall and the limits of retrospective questions in surveys. In Tanur

J. M.

(Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 65-94). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

42.

Porter

L. S.

Marco

C. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

Neale

J. M.

Shiffman

Stone

A. A.

(2000). Gender differences in coping: A comparison of trait and momentary assessments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 480-498. doi:10.1521/jscp.2000.19.4.480

43.

Ptacek

J. T.

Smith

R. E.

Espe

Raffety

(1994). Limited correspondence between daily coping reports and restrospective coping recall. Psychological Assessment, 6, 41-49. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.1.41

44.

Raffety

B. D.

Smith

R. E.

Ptacek

J. T.

(1997). Facilitating and debilitating trait anxiety, situational anxiety, and coping with an anticipated stressor: A process analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(4), 892.

45.

Rafaeli

Gleason

M. E.

(2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(1), 20-37.

46.

Randall

A. K.

Bodenmann

(2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010

47.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

48.

Regehr

Glancy

Pitts

(2013). Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.026

49.

Roth

Cohen

L. J.

(1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American psychologist, 41(7), 813.

50.

Rothbaum

Weisz

J. R.

Snyder

S. S.

(1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5

51.

Sarason

B. R.

Sarason

I. G.

Gurung

R. A. R.

(1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

52.

Schwarz

Groves

R. M.

Schuman

(1998). Survey methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

53.

Seybold

K. S.

Hill

P. C.

(2001). The role of religion and spirituality in mental and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 21-24. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00106

54.

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

Iida

Burke

C. T.

Gleason

M. E. J.

Lane

S. P.

(2010). The effects of daily support transactions during acute stress: Results form a diary study of bar exam preparation. In Sullivan

K. T.

Davila

(Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 175-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

55.

Shrout

P. E.

Herman

C. M.

Bolger

(2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13, 115-134. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.x

56.

Singer

J. D.

Willett

J. B.

(2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

57.

Skinner

E. A.

Edge

Altman

Sherwood

(2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216-269. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216

58.

Somerfield

M. R.

McCrae

R. R.

(2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. American Psychologist, 55, 620-625. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.620

59.

Stone

A. A.

Kennedy-Moore

Neale

J. M.

(1995). Association between daily coping and end-of-day mood. Health Psychology, 14, 341-349. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.4.341

60.

Stone

A. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

Neale

J. M.

Shiffman

Marco

C. A.

Hickcox

. . . Cruise

L. J.

(1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1670-1680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1670

61.

Tennen

Affleck

Armeli

Carney

M. A.

(2000). A daily process approach to coping: Linking theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 55, 626-636. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.626

62.

Tix

A. P.

Frazier

P. A.

(2005). Mediation and moderation of the relationship between intrinsic religiousness and mental health. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 295-306. doi:10.1177/0146167204271592

63.

Todd

Tennen

Carney

M. A.

Armeli

Affleck

(2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310-319. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310

64.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963

65.

Vitaliano

P. P.

DeWolfe

D. J.

Maiuro

R. D.

Russo

Katon

(1990). Appraised changeability of a stressor as a modifier of the relationship between coping and depression: A test of the hypothesis of fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 582-592. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.582

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB