Metamotivation research suggests that people understand the benefits of engaging in high-level versus low-level construal (i.e., orienting toward the abstract, essential versus concrete, idiosyncratic features of events) in goal-directed behavior. The current research examines the psychometric properties of one assessment of this knowledge and tests whether it predicts consequential outcomes (academic performance). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a two-factor structure, whereby knowledge of the benefits of high-level construal (i.e., high-level knowledge) and low-level construal (i.e., low-level knowledge) were distinct constructs. Participants on average evidenced beliefs about the normative benefits of high-level and low-level knowledge that accord with published research. Critically, individual differences in high-level and low-level knowledge independently predicted grades, controlling for traditional correlates of grades. These findings suggest metamotivational knowledge may be a key antecedent to goal success and lead to novel diagnostic assessments and interventions.
AbelsonR. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 129–133.
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.
3.
AydukÖ.KrossE. (2010). From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 809–829.
4.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.
5.
BonannoG.BurtonC. (2013). Regulatory flexibility. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612.
6.
BurtonC. L.BonannoG. A. (2016). Measuring ability to enhance and suppress emotional expression: The Flexible Regulation of Emotional Expression (FREE) Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 929–941.
7.
ChenP.PowersJ.KatragaddaK.CohenG.DweckC. (2020). A strategic mindset: An orientation toward strategic behavior during goal pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 14066–14072.
8.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203.
9.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.
10.
DweckC. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). Academic Press.
11.
FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 296–309.
12.
FlakeJ.PekJ.HehmanE. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378.
13.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739–752.
14.
FreundA. M.HenneckeM. (2015). On means and ends: The role of goal focus in successful goal pursuit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 149–153.
15.
FujitaK. (2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees: A construal level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1475–1496.
16.
FujitaK. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366.
17.
FujitaK.CarnevaleJ. J. (2012). Transcending temptation through abstraction: The role of construal level in self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 248–252.
18.
FujitaK.ScholerA. A.MieleD. B.NguyenT. (2019). On metamotivation: Consumers’ knowledge about the role of construal level in enhancing task performance. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(1), 57–64.
19.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
20.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168.
21.
GollwitzerP. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). Guilford Press.
22.
GrantH.DweckC. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.
23.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
24.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217–1230.
25.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008, September). Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature [Conference session]. 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management studies (pp. 195–200), Regent’s College, London, UK.
26.
KashdanT. B.RottenbergJ. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878.
27.
KimchiR.PalmerS. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8(4), 521–535.
28.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
29.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205.
30.
MacGregorK. E.CarnevaleJ. J.DusthimerN. E.FujitaK. (2017). Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 607–620.
31.
MaglioS. J.TropeY. (2012). Disembodiment: Abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(2), 211–216.
32.
MannT.de RidderD.FujitaK. (2013). Self-regulation of health behavior: Social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psychology, 32(5), 487–498.
33.
MieleD. B.ScholerA. A. (2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 1–21.
34.
MieleD. B.ScholerA. A.FujitaK. (2020). Metamotivation: Emerging research on the regulation of motivational states. Advances in Motivation Science, 7, 1–42.
35.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.
36.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14.
NguyenT.CarnevaleJ. J.ScholerA. A.MieleD. B.FujitaK. (2019). Metamotivational knowledge of the role of high-level and low-level construal in goal-relevant task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 876–899.
39.
NguyenT.TogawaT.ScholerA. A.FujitaK. (2020). A cross-cultural investigation of metamotivational knowledge of construal level in the United States and Japan. Motivation Science, 6(4), 386–400.
40.
RevelleW. R. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research [Software].
41.
RodmanA. M.PowersK. E.InselC.KastmanE. K.KabotyanskiK. E.StarkA. M.. . .SomervilleL. H. (2020). How adolescents and adults translate motivational value to action: Age-related shifts in strategic physical effort exertion for monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 150(1), 103–113.
42.
SchmeichelB.VohsK.DukeS. (2011). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 182–189.
43.
ScholerA. A.HigginsE. T. (2012). Too much of a good thing? Trade-offs in promotion and prevention focus. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 65–84). Oxford University Press.
44.
ScholerA. A.MieleD. B. (2016). The role of metamotivation in creating task-motivation fit. Motivation Science, 2(3), 171–197.
45.
ScholerA. A.MieleD. B.MurayamaK.FujitaK. (2018). New directions in self-regulation: The role of metamotivational beliefs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 437–442.
46.
SmithP. K.WigboldusD. H.DijksterhuisA. P. (2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 378–385.
47.
SoderbergC.CallahanS.KochersbergerA.AmitE.LedgerwoodA. (2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 525–548.
48.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.
49.
TropeY.LedgerwoodA.LibermanN.FujitaK. (2021). Regulatory scope and its mental and social supports. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 204–224.
50.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.
51.
WagnerR. K.SternbergR. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 436–458.
52.
WakslakC.TropeY. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20(1), 52–58.
53.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8(1), 60–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
