Broadened Concepts of Harm Appear Less Serious

Abstract

Harm-related concepts have progressively broadened their meanings to include less severe phenomena, but the implications of this expansion are unclear. Across five studies involving 1,819 American participants recruited on MTurk or Prolific, we manipulated whether participants learned about marginal, prototypical (severe), or mixed examples of workplace bullying (Studies 1 and 3a), trauma (Studies 2 and 3b), or sexual harassment (Study 4). We hypothesized that exposure to marginal examples of a concept would lead participants to view the harm associated with it as less serious than those exposed to prototypical examples (trivialization hypothesis). We also predicted that mixing marginal examples with prototypical examples would disproportionately reduce perceived seriousness (threshold shift hypothesis). All studies supported the trivialization hypothesis, but threshold shift was not consistently supported. Our findings suggest that broadened concepts of harm may dilute the perceived severity and urgency of the harms they identify.

Keywords

concept creep concept breadth trauma bullying moral psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., Rev.). Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Author.

Aparicio

Michalopoulos

L. M.

Unick

G. J.

(2013). An examination of the psychometric properties of the vicarious trauma scale in a sample of licensed social workers. Health & Social Work, 38(4), 199–206.

Barsalou

(1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.

Best

. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. University of California Press.

Campbell

Manning

(2018). The rise of victimhood culture: Microaggressions, safe spaces, and the new culture wars. Springer.

Chawla

Gabriel

A. S.

O’Leary Kelly

Rosen

C. C.

(2021). From #MeToo to #TimesUp: Identifying next steps in sexual harassment research in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 47(3), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320980518

Einarsen

Hoel

Notelaers

(2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673

Gladden

R. M.

Vivolo-Kantor

A. M.

Hamburger

M. E.

Lumpkin

C. D.

(2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements (Version 1.0). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education.

10.

Gordon

A. K.

Cohen

M. A.

Grauer

Rogelberg

(2005). Innocent flirting or sexual harassment? Perceptions of ambiguous work-place situations. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 28, 47–58.

11.

Gross

(2016, December 16). Are Americans experiencing collective trauma?. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/sunday/are-americans-experiencing-collective-trauma.html?searchResultPosition=4

12.

Haslam

(2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.

13.

Haslam

Dakin

B. C.

Fabiano

McGrath

M. J.

Rhee

Vylomova

Weaving

Wheeler

M. A.

(2020). Harm inflation: Making sense of concept creep. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 254–286.

14.

Haslam

McGrath

(2020). The concept creep of trauma. Social Research, 87, 509–531.

15.

Jones

P. J.

McNally

R. J.

(2021). Does broadening one’s concept of trauma undermine resilience? Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001063

16.

Lees

A. B.

(2018, October 14). Yes, you can be traumatized by the media!. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/surviving-thriving/201810/yes-you-can-be-traumatized-the-media

17.

Levari

D. E.

Gilbert

D. T.

Wilson

T. D.

Sievers

Amodio

D. M.

Wheatley

(2018). Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. Science, 360(6396), 1465–1467.

18.

Lukianoff

Haidt

(2019). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Books.

19.

Lutgen-Sandvik

Tracy

S. J.

Alberts

J. K.

(2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00715.x

20.

McGrath

M. J.

Randall-Dzerdz

Wheeler

M. A.

Murphy

Haslam

(2019). Concept creepers: Individual differences in harm-related concepts and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 79–84.

21.

McMahon

J. M.

Harvey

R. J.

(2006). An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ moral intensity construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), 381–404.

22.

McNally

R. J.

(2011). What is mental illness?. Harvard University Press.

23.

Niedl

(1996). Mobbing and wellbeing: Economic and personal development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 239–249.

24.

Olweus

(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.

25.

Pinker

(2012). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Penguin Books.

26.

Safe Work Australia. (2016). Dealing with workplace bullying—a worker’s guide. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1702/workers-guide-workplace-bullying.pdf

27.

Schein

Gray

(2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288

28.

Sojo

V. E.

Wood

R. E.

Genat

A. E.

(2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40.

29.

Sunstein

C. R.

(2018). The power of the normal. https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3239204

30.

Vaillancourt

McDougall

Hymel

Krygsman

Miller

Stiver

Davis

(2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 486–495.

31.

Vylomova

Murphy

Haslam

(2019, August 2). Evaluation of semantic change of harm-related concepts in psychology [Workshop session]. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change, pp. 29–34, Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy.

32.

Wheeler

M. A.

McGrath

M. J.

Haslam

(2019). Twentieth century morality: The rise and fall of moral concepts from 1900 to 2007. PLOS ONE, 14(2), Article e0212267.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB