The present investigation examined curvilinear relations between political ideology, on the one hand, and absolute certainty and dogmatism, on the other, across six online samples (N = 2,889). Ideological extremists were more likely than others to be absolutely certain: About one in three extremists reported being absolutely (i.e., 100%) certain of the correctness of their political beliefs, whereas about one in 15 non-extremists reported being absolutely certain. Although absolute political certainty was relatively symmetrical across the political left and right, conservatives tended to report greater domain-general dogmatism than liberals. Extremism effects for domain-general dogmatism were also present, however; and ideological asymmetries in dogmatism appeared to be driven by social, rather than economic, ideology. Taken together, these findings underscore the complexity of relations between absolute certainty, dogmatism, and ideology, ultimately challenging the sufficiency of contemporary psychological accounts of ideological (a)symmetries to describe our complex political reality.
AltemeyerR.A. (2002). Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a new measure of dogmatism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 713–721.
2.
AltemeyerR. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
3.
BaronJ.JostJ. T. (2019). False equivalence: Are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 292–303.
4.
BowesS. M.BlanchardM. C.CostelloT. H.AbramowitzA. I.LilienfeldS. O. (2020). Intellectual humility and between-party animus: Implications for affective polarization in two community samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 103992.
5.
BowesS. M.CostelloT. H.LeeC.McElroy-HeltzelS.DavisD. E.LilienfeldS. O. (2021). Stepping outside the echo chamber: Is intellectual humility associated with less political myside bias?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48, 150–164.
6.
ConwayL. G.IIIGornickL. J.HouckS. C.AndersonC.StockertJ.SessomsD.McCueK. (2016). Are conservatives really more simple-minded than liberals? The domain specificity of complex thinking. Political Psychology, 37, 777–798.
7.
CostelloT. H.BowesS. M.BaldwinM.LilienfeldS. O.TasimiA. (2021, November6). Are conservatives more rigid than liberals? A meta-analytic test of the rigidity-of-the-right hypothesis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kq4mn
8.
CostelloT. H.BowesS. M.StevensS. T.WaldmanI. W.TasimiA.LilienfeldS. O. (2021). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341
9.
CostelloT. H.LilienfeldS. O. (2020). Social and economic political ideology consistently operate as mutual suppressors: Implications for personality, social, and political psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://www.researcher-app.com/paper/6096609
10.
CrowsonH. M. (2009). Does the DOG scale measure dogmatism? Another look at construct validity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 365–383.
11.
DavisD. E.RiceK.McElroyS.DeBlaereC.ChoeE.Van TongerenD. R.HookJ. N. (2016). Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 215–224.
12.
DuckittJ. (2009). Authoritarianism and dogmatism. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 298–317). Guilford Press.
13.
FedericoC. M. (2021). When do psychological differences predict political differences?: Engagement and the psychological bases of political polarization. In van ProoijenJ.W. (Ed.), The psychology of political polarization (pp. 17–37). Routledge.
FeldmanS. (2013). Political ideology. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 591–626). Oxford University Press.
16.
HarrisE.Van BavelJ. J. (2020). Preregistered replication of “Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority.”Psychological Science, 32, 451–458.
17.
Johnson-LairdP. N.LegrenziP.GirottoV.LegrenziM. S.CaverniJ. P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62–88.
18.
JostJ. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208.
19.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
20.
KahanD. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.
21.
KalmoeN. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41, 771–793.
KleinP. (1992). Certainty. In DancyJ.SosaE. (Eds.), A companion to epistemology (61–64). Blackwell.
24.
LearyM. R.DiebelsK. J.DavissonE. K.Jongman-SerenoK. P.IsherwoodJ. C.RaimiK. T.DefflerS. A.HoyleR. H. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 793–813.
25.
LevayK. E.FreeseJ.DruckmanJ. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016636433.
26.
LewisC. I. (1956). Mind and the world-order: Outline of a theory of knowledge. Courier Corporation.
27.
MalkaA.SotoC. J. (2015). Rigidity of the economic right? Menu-independent and menu-dependent influences of psychological dispositions on political attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 137–142.
28.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.InzlichtM.LelkesY. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031.
29.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembkaP. (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 104–142). Academic Press.
30.
PopperK. R. (2020). The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1945).
31.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.
32.
RokeachM. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Basic Books.
33.
RollwageM.DolanR. J.FlemingS. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28, 4014–4021.
34.
SimonsohnU. (2018). Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of U-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 538–555.
35.
TanesiniA. (2018). Intellectual humility as attitude. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96, 399–420.
36.
TetlockP. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In PratkanisA. R.BrecklerS. J.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129–151). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
TonerK.LearyM. R.AsherM. W.Jongman-SerenoK. P. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science, 24, 2454–2462.
van ProoijenJ. W.KrouwelA. P. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 292–300.
40.
WagenmakersE. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
41.
WilsonA. E.ParkerV. A.FeinbergM. (2020, August8). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ebp3z
42.
ZellE.BernsteinM. J. (2014). You may think you’re right . . . Young adults are more liberal than they realize. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 326–333.
43.
ZmigrodL. (2020). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: Theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34–39.
44.
ZmigrodL.RentfrowP. J.RobbinsT. W. (2019). Cognitive inflexibility predicts extremist attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 989.
45.
ZmigrodL.RentfrowP. J.RobbinsT. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 407–418.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
