The rigidity of the right model posits that psychological needs for security and certainty (NSC) attract people to a broad right-wing ideology that includes both sociocultural and economic political attitudes. We review evidence that NSC characteristics do not consistently predict economically right-wing preferences and propose the Menu-Independent and -Dependent Influence (MIDI) model as an alternative account of disposition-politics relations. In this model, NSC naturally attracts people to socioculturally conservative attitudes, but its effects on economic attitudes are the net outcome of potentially competing dispositional and discursive influences. We review evidence in support of the MIDI model and discuss its implications for understanding the interplay of background characteristics, social context, and political conflict.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). (See References). A brief overview of the dual-process model of ideology, which posits distinct motivational processes underlying different ideological domains.
2.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. D. (2014). (See References). An article that demonstrates the value of a multidimensional conceptualization of ideology for understanding the psychological origins of political attitudes.
3.
HatemiP. K.EavesL.McDermottR. (2012). (See References). An article reporting evidence that the genetically based structure of political attitudes is different from the right-left attitude structure brought about by political discourse.
4.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). (See References). A recent overview of evidence for the rigidity of the right model, with commentaries from other scholars and a response from the authors.
5.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7, e42366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366. An article that presents evidence regarding the dispositional correlates of self-identified libertarianism, which theoretically entails the combination of right-wing economic views and left-wing socio-cultural views.
6.
BenoitK.LaverM. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London, England: Routledge.
7.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807โ840.
8.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. (Ed.), Ideology and discontents (pp. 206โ261). New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
CrowsonH. M. (2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143, 449โ463.
10.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98โ109.
11.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861โ1894.
12.
DuriezB.Van HielA. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 199โ1213.
13.
FedericoC. M.GorenP. (2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267โ291). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
FedericoC. M.JohnstonC. D.LavineH. G. (2014). Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 311โ312.
15.
FeldmanS.HuddyL. (2014). Not so simple: The multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 312โ313.
16.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. D. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337โ358.
17.
FraleyR. C.GriffinB. N.BelskyJ.RoismanG. I. (2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23, 1425โ1431.
18.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Social Review, 104, 111โ133.
19.
GolecA. (2002). Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33, 5โ12.
20.
HatemiP. K.EavesL.McDermottR. (2012). Itโs the end of ideology as we know it. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24, 345โ369.
21.
HennesE. P.NamH. H.SternC.JostJ. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669โ688.
22.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 297โ350.
23.
JohnsonS. D.TamneyJ. B. (2001). Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 233โ243.
24.
JohnstonC. D. (2013). Dispositional sources of economic protectionism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 574โ585.
25.
JohnstonC. D.WronskiJ. (2013). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/pops.12068
26.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307โ333.
27.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339โ375.
28.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209โ232.
29.
KahanD. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407โ424.
30.
KossowskaM.Van HielA. V. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501โ518.
31.
MalkaA.LelkesY. (2010). More than ideology: Conservativeโliberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156โ188.
32.
MalkaA.SotoC. J. (2011). The conflicting influences of religiosity on attitude toward torture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1091โ1103.
33.
MalkaA.SotoC. J. (2014). How encompassing is the effect of negativity bias on political conservatism?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 320โ321.
34.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.InzlichtM.LelkesY. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031โ1051.
35.
OxleyD. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.MillerM. S.ScaloraM.. . . HibbingJ. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667โ1670. doi:10.1126/science.1157627
36.
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. L. (2011). Ideology and congress (Vol. 1). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
37.
SchwartzS. H.CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.BainP.BianchiG.CapraraM. G.. . . ZaleskiZ. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899โ930. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z
38.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470โ487.
SnidermanP. M.BullockJ. (2004). A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. In SarisW. E.SnidermanP. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 337โ357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
StangorC.LearyM. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 243โ281). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42.
TeslerM. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 690โ704.
43.
TetlockP. E.BernzweigJ.GallantJ. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227โ1239.
44.
ThorisdottirH.JostJ. T.LiviatanI.ShroutP. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying leftโright political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175โ203.
45.
Van HielA.OnraetE.De PauwS. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765โ1800.
