Rigidity of the Economic Right? Menu-Independent and Menu-Dependent Influences of Psychological Dispositions on Political Attitudes

Abstract

The rigidity of the right model posits that psychological needs for security and certainty (NSC) attract people to a broad right-wing ideology that includes both sociocultural and economic political attitudes. We review evidence that NSC characteristics do not consistently predict economically right-wing preferences and propose the Menu-Independent and -Dependent Influence (MIDI) model as an alternative account of disposition-politics relations. In this model, NSC naturally attracts people to socioculturally conservative attitudes, but its effects on economic attitudes are the net outcome of potentially competing dispositional and discursive influences. We review evidence in support of the MIDI model and discuss its implications for understanding the interplay of background characteristics, social context, and political conflict.

Keywords

ideology political psychology conservatism rigidity of the right political attitudes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2009). (See References). A brief overview of the dual-process model of ideology, which posits distinct motivational processes underlying different ideological domains.

Feldman

Johnston

C. D.

(2014). (See References). An article that demonstrates the value of a multidimensional conceptualization of ideology for understanding the psychological origins of political attitudes.

Hatemi

P. K.

Eaves

McDermott

(2012). (See References). An article reporting evidence that the genetically based structure of political attitudes is different from the right-left attitude structure brought about by political discourse.

Hibbing

J. R.

Smith

K. B.

Alford

J. R.

(2014). (See References). A recent overview of evidence for the rigidity of the right model, with commentaries from other scholars and a response from the authors.

Iyer

Koleva

Graham

Ditto

Haidt

(2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7, e42366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366. An article that presents evidence regarding the dispositional correlates of self-identified libertarianism, which theoretically entails the combination of right-wing economic views and left-wing socio-cultural views.

Benoit

Laver

(2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London, England: Routledge.

Carney

D. R.

Jost

J. T.

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

(2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.

Converse

P. E.

(1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter

(Ed.), Ideology and discontents (pp. 206–261). New York, NY: Free Press.

Crowson

H. M.

(2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143, 449–463.

10.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109.

11.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894.

12.

Duriez

Van Hiel

(2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 199–1213.

13.

Federico

C. M.

Goren

(2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

Thorisdottir

(Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267–291). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

14.

Federico

C. M.

Johnston

C. D.

Lavine

H. G.

(2014). Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 311–312.

15.

Feldman

Huddy

(2014). Not so simple: The multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 312–313.

16.

Feldman

Johnston

C. D.

(2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337–358.

17.

Fraley

R. C.

Griffin

B. N.

Belsky

Roisman

G. I.

(2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23, 1425–1431.

18.

Gerber

A. S.

Huber

G. A.

Doherty

Dowling

C. M.

S. E.

(2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Social Review, 104, 111–133.

19.

Golec

(2002). Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33, 5–12.

20.

Hatemi

P. K.

Eaves

McDermott

(2012). It’s the end of ideology as we know it. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24, 345–369.

21.

Hennes

E. P.

Nam

H. H.

Stern

Jost

J. T.

(2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688.

22.

Hibbing

J. R.

Smith

K. B.

Alford

J. R.

(2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 297–350.

23.

Johnson

S. D.

Tamney

J. B.

(2001). Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 233–243.

24.

Johnston

C. D.

(2013). Dispositional sources of economic protectionism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 574–585.

25.

Johnston

C. D.

Wronski

(2013). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/pops.12068

26.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–333.

27.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

28.

Jost

J. T.

Thompson

E. P.

(2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

29.

Kahan

D. M.

(2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.

30.

Kossowska

Van Hiel

A. V.

(2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501–518.

31.

Malka

Lelkes

(2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156–188.

32.

Malka

Soto

C. J.

(2011). The conflicting influences of religiosity on attitude toward torture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1091–1103.

33.

Malka

Soto

C. J.

(2014). How encompassing is the effect of negativity bias on political conservatism? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 320–321.

34.

Malka

Soto

C. J.

Inzlicht

Lelkes

(2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031–1051.

35.

Oxley

D. R.

Smith

K. B.

Alford

J. R.

Hibbing

M. V.

Miller

M. S.

Scalora

. . . Hibbing

J. R.

(2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670. doi:10.1126/science.1157627

36.

Poole

K. T.

Rosenthal

H. L.

(2011). Ideology and congress (Vol. 1). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

37.

Schwartz

S. H.

Caprara

G. V.

Vecchione

Bain

Bianchi

Caprara

M. G.

. . . Zaleski

(2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z

38.

Skitka

L. J.

Mullen

Griffin

Hutchinson

Chamberlin

(2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487.

39.

Smith

K. B.

Oxley

D. R.

Hibbing

M. V.

Alford

J. R.

Hibbing

J. R.

(2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), Article e25552.Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025552

40.

Sniderman

P. M.

Bullock

(2004). A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. In Saris

W. E.

Sniderman

P. M.

(Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 337–357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

41.

Stangor

Leary

(2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. In Zanna

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 243–281). New York, NY: Academic Press.

42.

Tesler

(2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 690–704.

43.

Tetlock

P. E.

Bernzweig

Gallant

J. L.

(1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227–1239.

44.

Thorisdottir

Jost

J. T.

Liviatan

Shrout

P. E.

(2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left–right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175–203.

45.

Van Hiel

Onraet

De Pauw

(2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765–1800.