Integrating the suffocation model of marriage with research on residential mobility, the current studies examined for the first time whether long-term romantic relationships are more central for residentially mobile (vs. stable) individuals (total N across three studies = 5,366; age range = 18–95). In Study 1, individuals who moved away from their place of birth (vs. not) were more likely to first confide in their spouse over other network members on important matters. In Study 2, history of frequent residential moves was associated with greater importance ascribed to romantic partners in the attachment hierarchy. In Study 3, the slope of perceived partner responsiveness predicting eudaimonic well-being got steeper as residential mobility increased. By showing the role of residential mobility in romantic relationships, our findings highlight the importance of studying socioecological factors to gain a deeper understanding of how relationship processes unfold.
AdamsG.KurtisT.SalterP. S.AndersonS. L. (2012). A cultural psychology of relationship: Decolonizing science and practice. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. D. (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating across evolutionary, neuroscience and sociocultural approaches (pp. 49–70). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13489-003
ClarkW. A. V. (1992). Comparing cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of residential mobility and migration. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 24(9), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1068/a241291
5.
ClarkW. A. V.HuangY. (2003). The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3542
6.
CobanC. (2013). Different periods of internal migration in Turkey from the perspective of development. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(10), 58–65.
7.
CoulterR.ScottJ. (2015). What motivates residential mobility? Re-examining self-reported reasons for desiring and making residential moves. Population, Space and Place, 21(4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1863
8.
De ValkH.SchansD. (2008). “They ought to do this for their parents”: Perceptions of filial obligations among immigrant and Dutch older people. Ageing & Society, 28(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X07006307
9.
DiamondL. M.HicksA. M. (2005). Attachment style, current relationship security, and negative emotions: The mediating role of physiological regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054520
10.
DienerE.LucasR. E.OishiS. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
DurgelE. S.LeyendeckerB.YagmurluB.HarwoodR. (2009). Sociocultural influences on German and Turkish immigrant mothers’ long-term socialization goals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109339210
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
15.
FinkelE. J.CheungE. O.EmeryL. F.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2015). The suffocation model: Why marriage in America is becoming an all-or-nothing institution. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569274
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723
18.
FraleyR. C.DavisK. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
19.
FrenchJ. E.MeltzerA. L. (2019). Maximizing tendencies in marriage: Accentuating the implications of readily observable partner characteristics for intimates’ satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1468–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219832337
GedikA. (1997). Internal migration in Turkey, 1965–1985: Test of conflicting findings in the literature. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 9(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.1997.tb00104.x
22.
GeorgasJ.MylonasK.BafitiT.PoortingaY. H.ChristakopoulouS.KagitcibasiC.. . .SunarD. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000045
23.
GokhanA.FiliztekinA. (2008, July2–4). The determinants of internal migration in Turkey [Conference session]. International Conference on Policy Modelling, EcoMod 2008, Berlin, Germany. http://research.sabanciuniv.edu/11336/1/749.pdf
24.
GruijtersR. J. (2017). Intergenerational contact in Chinese families: Structural and cultural explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12390
25.
GunaydinG.SelcukE.UrganciB.YalcintasS. (2020). Today you care, tomorrow you don’t: Differential roles of responsiveness variability and average responsiveness in romantic attachment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620944111
26.
GunaydinG.SelcukE.YilmazC.HazanC. (2018). I have, therefore I love: Status quo preference in mate choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217746339
27.
HazanC.HuttM. J.SturgeonJ.BrickerT. (1991, April). The process of relinquishing parents as attachment figures [Paper presentation]. Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA, United States.
IşıkŞ. (2009). Türkiye’de eğitim amaçlı göçler [Migration for educational reasons in Turkey]. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi/Journal of Geographical Sciences, 7(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000092
30.
JebbA. T.MorrisonM.TayL.DienerE. (2020). Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychological Science, 31(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898826
31.
JokelaM. (2020). Selective residential mobility and social influence in the emergence of neighborhood personality differences: Longitudinal data from Australia. Journal of Research in Personality, 86, 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103953
32.
KagitcibasiC. (1985). Culture of separateness-culture of relatedness. In KloppC. (Ed.), Vision and reality. Papers in comparative studies (pp. 91–99). Ohio State University.
33.
KagitcibasiC. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
KagitcibasiC. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205281
KashimaY.YamaguchiS.KimU.ChoiS. C.GelfandM. J.YukiM. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.925
37.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
38.
KeyesC. L. M.ShmotkinD.RyffC. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
39.
LarsonJ. (1984). The effect of husband’s unemployment on marital and family relations in blue-collar families. Family Relations, 33(4), 503–511. https://doi:10.2307/583828
40.
LevineM.ThompsonK. (2004). Identity, place, and bystander intervention: Social categories and helping after natural disasters. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.3.229-245
41.
MagdolL.BesselD. R. (2003). Social capital, social currency, and portable assets: The impact of residential mobility on exchanges of social support. Personal Relationships, 10(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00043
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301
44.
MokP. L.WebbR. T.ApplebyL.PedersenC. B. (2016). Full spectrum of mental disorders linked with childhood residential mobility. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 78, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.011
45.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.RoseP.BellaviaG. M. (2003). Calibrating the sociometer: The relational contingencies of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.63
46.
OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K.RiceT. M.TheisenJ. C.ManiotesC. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
47.
OishiS. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781
OishiS.KislingJ. (2009). The mutual constitution of residential mobility and individualism. In WyerR. S.Jr.ChiuC.-Y.HongY. Y. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 223–239). Psychology Press.
50.
OishiS.LunJ.ShermanG. D. (2007). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.131
51.
OishiS.MiaoF. F.KooM.KislingJ.RatliffK. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024949
52.
OishiS.SchimmackU. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019389
53.
OishiS.SchugJ.YukiM.AxtJ. (2015). The psychology of residential and relational motilities. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.-Y.HongY.-Y. (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 221–272). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190218966.003.0005
54.
RantaM.DietrichJ.Salmela-AroK. (2014). Career and romantic relationship goals and concerns during emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813515852
SbarraD. A.HazanC. (2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702
58.
SelcukE.GunaydinG.OngA. D.AlmeidaD. M. (2016). Does partner responsiveness predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being? A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 311–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12272
59.
StanleyT. D.CarterE. C.DoucouliagosH. (2018). What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000169
60.
SunarD. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In OzdalgaE.LiljestromR. (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217–238). Swedish Research Institute.
61.
SunarD.FisekG. (2005). Contemporary Turkish families. In GielenU.RoopnarineJ. (Eds.), Families in global perspective (pp. 169–183). Pearson.
62.
TasfilizD.SelcukE.GunaydinG.SlatcherR. B.CorrieroE. F.OngA. D. (2018). Patterns of perceived partner responsiveness and well-being in Japan and the United States. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000378
63.
ThalmayerA. G.ToscanelliC.ArnettJ. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000622
64.
Touré-TilleryM.FishbachA. (2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000089
65.
TuckerM.TaylorR. (1989). Demographic correlates of relationship status among Black Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(3), 655–665. https://doi:10.2307/352165
66.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2019). Life satisfaction survey data 2003-2017 [Dataset]. https://www.tuik.gov.tr
67.
ViryG. (2012). Residential mobility and the spatial dispersion of personal networks: Effects on social support. Social Networks, 34(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.07.003
68.
WangY.KirmaniA.LiX. (2021). Not too far to help: Residential mobility, global identity, and donations to distant beneficiaries. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa053
69.
WebbR. T.PedersenC. B.MokP. L. (2016). Adverse outcomes to early middle age linked with childhood residential mobility. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.011
70.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028601
71.
YangM. L.ChiouW. B. (2010). Looking online for the best romantic partner reduces decision quality: The moderating role of choice-making strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0208
72.
ZayasV.GunaydinG.ShodaY. (2015). From an unknown other to an attachment figure: How do mental representations change with attachment formation? In ZayasV.HazanC. (Eds.), Bases of adult attachment: Linking brain, mind, and behavior (pp. 157–183). Springer.
73.
ZeifmanD.HazanC. (2008). Pair bonds as attachments: Reevaluating the evidence. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 436–455). Guilford Press.
74.
ZhaoN.XuK.SunL. (2021). Residential mobility and trust: The moderating role of cognitive need for closure. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490920974759
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
