Previous research indicates that partner responsiveness and self-expansion play key roles in the creation, maintenance, and improvement of close relationships. This experiment examined the hypothesis that active (vs. passive) partner support for an individual’s opportunity for self-expansion would increase relationship satisfaction. In an experimental task manipulated to be either self-expanding or stressful, dating couple members (N = 116; 58 couples) received active or passive support messages, ostensibly from their partners. Among those in longer term (14–60 months), but not in shorter term relationships, relationship satisfaction increased significantly more for those who received active (vs. passive) support for self-expansion. This same pattern was not found when partners’ messages responded to a stressful task or for couples in short-term relationships. This study provides the first experimental evidence for effects on relationship satisfaction of partner support for individual self-expansion. In addition, the findings suggest the potential substantial importance of relationship length for moderating self-expansion processes.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of the self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp/Harper & Row Publishers.
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (1996). Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45–58. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00103.x
3.
AronA.LewandowskiJr., G. W.MashekD.AronE. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.LewandowskiG. (2002). Shared participation in self-expanding activities: positive effects on experienced marital quality. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 177–194). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273
6.
BarnesM. K.DuckS. (1994). Everyday communicative contexts for social support. In BurlesonB. R.AlbrechtT. L.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 175–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
8.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
9.
BrunsteinJ. C.DangelmayerG.SchultheissO. C. (1996). Personal goals and social support in close relationships: Effects on mood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1006–1019. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.1006
10.
BurlesonB. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00033
11.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.Jr (2010). Close relationships. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology: Fifth Edition (Vol 2, pp. 898–940). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363–383. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363
13.
CoulterK.MalouffJ. M. (2013). Effects of an intervention designed to enhance romantic relationship excitement: A randomized-control trial. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2, 34–44. doi:10.1037/a0031719
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
15.
DavilaJ.SullivanK. (Eds.) (2011). Support processes in intimate relationships. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
16.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.WieselquistJ.WhittonS. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 293–323. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.293
17.
FeeneyB. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.631
18.
GableS. L.GonzagaG. C.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904–917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904
19.
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 42, pp. 195–257). San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Inc.
20.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
21.
GrahamJ. M. (2008). Self-expansion and flow in couples’ momentary experiences: An experience sampling study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 679–694. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.679
22.
HendrickS. S.DickeA.HendrickC. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142. doi:10.1177/0265407598151009
23.
HowlandM.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Getting under the radar: A dyadic view of invisible support. Psychological Science, 21, 1–8. doi:10.1177/0956797610388817
24.
HustonT.McHaleS.CrouterA. (1986). When the honeymoon is over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In GilmourR.DuckS. W. (Eds.), The emerging field of close relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
26.
LearyM. R. (1983). Brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371–375. doi:10.1177/0146167283093007.
27.
LewandowskiG. W.JrAronA. (2004). Distinguishing arousal from novelty and challenge in initial romantic attraction between strangers. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 361–372. doi:10.2224/sbp.2004.32.4.361
28.
LoganJ. M.CobbR. J. (2013). Trajectories of relationship satisfaction: Independent contributions of capitalization and support perceptions. Personal Relationships, 20, 277–273. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01408.x
29.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00201.x
30.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2013a). An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 12, 621–634. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.718863
31.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2013b). The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 12–22. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.746999
32.
McCraeR.CostaP. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50032-9
33.
MillerG. A.ChapmanJ. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.110.1.40
34.
MoldenD. C.LucasG. M.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM.RusbultC (2009). Perceived support for promotion-focused and prevention focused goals: Associations with well-being in unmarried and married couples. Psychological Science, 20, 787–793. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02362.x
35.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.AloniM.PinkusR. T.DerrickJ. L.LederS. (2009). Commitment insurance: Compensating for the autonomy costs of interdependence in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 256–278. doi:10.1037/a0014562
36.
PaschL. A.BradburyT. N.SullivanK. T. (1997). Social support in marriage: an analysis of intraindividual and interpersonal components. In PierceG. R.LakeyB.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 229–256). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
37.
ReisH. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00139.x
38.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
39.
ReissmanC.AronA.BergenM. R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 243–254. doi:10.1177/026540759301000205
40.
TesserA.MillarM.MooreJ. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflective processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49–61. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.49
41.
TsapelasI.AronA.OrbuchT. (2009). Marital boredom now predicts less satisfaction 9 years later. Psychological Science, 20, 543–545. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02332.x
