The present research introduces the possibility that Whiteness can threaten majority group members’ sense of uniqueness and reduce their support for multiculturalism, an ideology that emphasizes recognition of distinctive cultural identities and is seen as primarily relevant to racial/ethnic minorities. Across three studies, being induced to self-identify as “White” (vs. “European American”) led majority group members high, but not low, in need for uniqueness (measured in Study 1, manipulated in Studies 2 and 3) to express less positivity toward multiculturalism. Further, the effect of uniqueness motives on reduced support for multiculturalism among participants self-identifying as “White” was mediated by reduced personal feelings of diversity (Study 3). Implications for optimal distinctiveness theory and the functions of White identity are discussed.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
2.
BrownC. S.SpatzierA.TobinM. (2010). Variability in the inter-group attitudes of White children: What we can learn from their ethnic identity labels. Social Development, 19(4), 758–778.
CohenA. B.HillP. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 709–742.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
7.
GorenM. J.PlautV. C. (2012). Identity form matters: White racial identity and attitudes toward diversity. Self and Identity, 11(2), 237–254.
8.
HahnA.BanchefskyS.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: Positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1646–1664.
9.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
10.
HornseyM. J.JettenJ. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 248–264.
11.
ImhoffR.ErbH. P. (2009). What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 309–320.
12.
KimH.MarkusH. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800.
13.
LeonardelliG. J.BrewerM. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 468–485.
14.
LeonardelliG. J.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 63–113). Academic Press.
15.
LynnM.HarrisJ. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883.
16.
MartinJ. N.KrizekR. L.NakayamaT. K.BradfordL. (1996). Exploring whiteness: A study of self labels for white Americans. Communication Quarterly, 44(2), 125–144.
17.
MorrisonK. R.ChungA. H. (2011). “White” or “European American”? Self-identifying labels influence majority group members’ interethnic attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 165–170.
18.
MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1648–1661.
19.
PickettC. L.SilverM. D.BrewerM. B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 546–558.
20.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 337–353.
21.
PlautV. C.MarkusH. R.LachmanM. E. (2002). Place matters: Consensual features and regional variation in American well-being and self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 160–184.
22.
RattanA.AmbadyN. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 12–21.
23.
RiosK.MarkmanK. D.SchroederJ.DyczewskiE. A. (2014). A (creative) portrait of the uncertain individual: Self-uncertainty and individualism enhance creative generation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 1050–1062.
24.
RyanC. S.HuntJ. S.WeibleJ. A.PetersonC. R.CasasJ. F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 617–637.
25.
SalancikG. R.ConwayM. (1975). Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 829–840.
26.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.
27.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity?Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(3), 443–446.
28.
WhitleyB. E.JrWebsterG. D. (2019). The relationships of intergroup ideologies to ethnic prejudice: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 207–237.
29.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2006). Considering the tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19(3), 277–306.
30.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 635–654.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
