In two studies, we demonstrated that liberals underestimate their similarity to other liberals (i.e., display truly false uniqueness), whereas moderates and conservatives overestimate their similarity to other moderates and conservatives (i.e., display truly false consensus; Studies 1 and 2). We further demonstrated that a fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives in the motivation to feel unique explains this ideological distinction in the accuracy of estimating similarity (Study 2). Implications of the accuracy of consensus estimates for mobilizing liberal and conservative political movements are discussed.
ArndtJ.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT.SchimelJ. (1999). Creativity and terror management: Evidence that creative activity increases guilt and social projection following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 19–32.
2.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
3.
ButcherJ. N.DahlstromW. G.GrahamJ. R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). MMPI-2 manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
CavazzaN.Mucchi-FainaA. (2008). Me, us, or them: Who is more conformist? Perception of conformity and political orientation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 335–346.
DollingerS. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035.
9.
DuvalS. (1976). Conformity on a visual task as a function of personal novelty on attitudinal dimensions and being reminded of the object status of self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 87–98.
10.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.
11.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. (2005). Culture war?New York, NY: Pearson Education.
12.
FoxW. S.WilliamsJ. D. (1974). Political orientation and music preferences among college students. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 352–371.
13.
FromkinH. L. (1968). Affective and valuational consequences of self-perceived uniqueness deprivation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
14.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (in press). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.
15.
HochS. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221–234.
16.
ImhoffR.ErbH. P. (2009). What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 309–320.
17.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
18.
KernisM. H. (1984). Need for uniqueness, self-schemas, and thought as moderators of the false-consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 350–362.
19.
KruegerJ. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163–240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
KruegerJ. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1–35.
21.
KruegerJ.ClementR. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
22.
KruegerJ. I.FunderD. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 313–327.
23.
KruegerJ.ZeigerJ. S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670–680.
24.
MarksG.MillerN. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.
25.
McNemarQ. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
26.
MullenB.AtkinsJ. L.ChampionD. S.EdwardsC.HardyD.StoryJ. E.VanderklokM. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262–283.
RankO. (1989). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development. New York, NY: Knopf. (Original work published 1932)
29.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
30.
SandersG. S.MullenB. (1983). Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 57–70.
31.
ShermanS. J.ChassinL.PressonC. C.AgostinelliG. (1984). The role of the evaluation and similarity principles in the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1244–1262.
32.
SimonL.GreenbergJ.ArndtJ.PyszczynskiT.ClementR.SolomonS. (1997). Perceived consensus, uniqueness, and terror management: Compensatory responses to threats to inclusion and distinctiveness following mortality salience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1055–1065.
33.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–527.
34.
SulsJ.WanC. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211–217.
35.
TarrH.LorrM. (1991). A comparison of right-wing authoritarianism, conformity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 307–311.
36.
TetlockP. E.BernzweigJ.GallantJ. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227–1239.
37.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
38.
WilsonG. D.AusmanJ.MathewsT. R. (1973). Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 286–288.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
