Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created a unique climate for examining the links between stressful conditions and couples’ relationship well-being. According to theories of stress spillover, stressors originating outside the relationship, such as work stress and financial uncertainty, often undermine relationship quality. However, if individuals can easily attribute their problems to the stressful circumstances, their relationship may be more resilient. Given the salience of the pandemic, the current study used two waves of 14-day daily diary data collected from 191 participants to examine whether blaming the pandemic for problems may reduce stress spillover. We also expected the buffering effect of pandemic blaming attributions to wane as stressful conditions persisted and continued to tax partners’ coping resources. Multilevel modeling confirmed that women, but not men, who were more blaming of the pandemic exhibited reduced stress spillover during the COVID-19 outbreak; notably, this buffering effect did not weaken over time.

Keywords

stress spillover COVID-19 relationship quality attributions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bodenmann

(2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson

T. A.

Kayser

Bodenmann

(Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (1st ed., pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11031-002

Bolger

Laurenceau

J. P.

(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.

Buck

A. A.

Neff

L. A.

(2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029260

Clavél

F. D.

Cutrona

C. E.

Russell

D. W.

(2017). United and divided by stress: How stressors differentially influence social support in African American couples over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217704195

Cohan

C. L.

(2010). Family transitions following natural and terrorist disaster: Hurricane Hugo and the September 11 terrorist attack. In Miller

T. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of stressful transitions across the lifespan (pp. 149–164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0748-6_8

Cohan

C. L.

Cole

S. W.

(2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: Marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.14

Cohan

C. L.

Cole

S. W.

Schoen

(2009). Divorce following the September 11 terrorist attacks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509351043

Craig

Churchill

(2020). Dual-earner parent couples’ work and care during COVID-19. Gender, Work, and Organization. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12497

Cranford

J. A.

Shrout

P. E.

Iida

Rafaeli

Yip

Bolger

(2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929. https://doi-org/10.1177/0146167206287721

10.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356

11.

Diamond

L. M.

Hicks

A. M.

(2012). “It’s the economy, honey!” Couples’ blame attributions during the 2007–2009 economic crisis. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01380.x

12.

Falconier

M. K.

Jackson

J. B.

(2020). Economic strain and couple relationship functioning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000157

13.

Falconier

M. K.

Nussbeck

Bodenmann

Scheider

Bradbury

T.N.

(2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 41, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.111/jmft.12073

14.

González-Sanguino

Ausín

Castellanos

Saiz

López-Gómez

Ugidos

Muñoz

(2020). Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.040

15.

Hobfoll

S. E.

(1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.44.3.513

16.

Hou

Neff

L. A.

Kim

S. Y.

(2018). Language acculturation, acculturation-related stress, and marital quality in Chinese American couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(2), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12447

17.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

18.

Marshall

E. M.

Kuijer

R. G.

Simpson

J. A.

Szepsenwol

(2017). Standing on shaky ground? Dyadic and longitudinal associations between posttraumatic stress and relationship quality post-earthquake. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000305

19.

McCubbin

H. I.

Patterson

J. M.

(1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage and Family Review, 6(1-2), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v06n01_02

20.

Neff

L. A.

Karney

B. R.

(2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013

21.

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Overall

N. C.

(2020). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714

22.

Randall

A. K.

Bodenmann

(2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004

23.

SAS Institute, Inc. (2020). SAS 9.4 for windows. https://www.sas.com/en_us/home.html#

24.

Story

L. B.

Repetti

(2006). Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(4), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.690

25.

Tesser

Beach

S. R. H.

(1998). Life events, relationship quality, and depression: An investigation of judgment discontinuity in vivo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.36

26.

Williamson

H. C.

(2020). Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on relationship satisfaction and attributions. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972688

27.

Williamson

H. C.

Bradbury

T. N

Karney

B. R.

(in press). Experiencing a natural disaster temporarily boosts relationship satisfaction in newlywed couples. Psychological Science.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Blame the Pandemic: Buffering the Association Between Stress and Relationship Quality During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material