Similarity within romantic couples forms one component of the formation and maintenance of relationships, meaning that, romantic partners’ views about themselves and the world are theorized to converge over time. We advance prior research on romantic couple similarities using cross-sectional or time-lagged designs, testing convergence with dyadic trajectories of change—how changes in one person relate to changes in their partner. Dyadic growth curve models assessed initial similarities, and longitudinal convergence, for 35 measures of well-being and individual differences in 171 mixed-gender couples from a national longitudinal study (the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Survey). Results indicated consistent average-level similarities between romantic partners, a few instances of short-term convergence in sociopolitical views, and the consistent pattern that changes in people occurred independently to their partners. Findings advance theory on romantic interdependence by emphasizing the perspective that romantic partners’ convergence occurs as subjective experience rather than externally measured unification.
AcitelliL. K.KennyD. A.WeinerD. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475–6811.2001.tb00034.x
2.
AckermanR. A.KennyD. A. (2016, December). APIMPower: An interactive tool for actor–partner interdependence model power analysis [Computer software]. https://robert–a–ackerman.shinyapps.io/apimpower/
3.
AndersonC.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.84.5.1054
4.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.60.2.241
5.
AtkinsonJ.SalmondC.CramptonP. (2019). Nzdep2018 index of deprivation, final research report, December 2020. University of Otago.
6.
BartonA. W.LavnerJ. A.StanleyS. M.JohnsonM. D.RhoadesG. K. (2020). “Will you complete this survey too?” Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000583
7.
BergerP.KellnerH. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge. Diogenes, 12(46), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216401204601
8.
BerscheidE. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd Ed., pp 413–484). Addison-Wesley.
9.
BurlesonB. R.DentonW. H. (1992). A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social-cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction. Communications Monographs, 59(3), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376269
ColumbusS.MolhoC.RighettiF.BallietD. (2020). Interdependence and cooperation in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000253
12.
CoyneA. E.ConstantinoM. J.LawsH. B.WestraH. A.AntonyM. M. (2018). Patient-therapist convergence in alliance ratings as a predictor of outcome in psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy Research, 28, 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1303209
13.
CurranP. J.HowardA. L.BainterS. A.LaneS. T.McGinleyJ. S. (2014). The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035297
14.
DavisJ. L.RusbultC. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.81.1.65
15.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.WieselquistJ.WhittonS. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.77.2.293
16.
DuckS. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In CanaryD. J.StaffordL. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45–60). Academic Press.
17.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.LevineJ. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6924.2009.01161.x
18.
ErolR. Y.OrthU. (2014). Development of self–esteem and relationship satisfaction in couples: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2291–2303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037370
19.
FarrellA. K.StantonS. C. (2019). Toward a mechanistic understanding of links between close relationships and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855657
FletcherG. J. (2015). Accuracy and bias of judgments in romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415571664
22.
FordT. E.FergusonM. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4
23.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.RubinD. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
24.
GonzagaG. C.CamposB.BradburyT. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.93.1.34
25.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C.CrossE. J. (2016). Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partners’ benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 214–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000043
26.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3., pp. 28–84). Guilford Press.
27.
HigginsE. T. (2019). Shared reality: What makes us strong and tears us apart. Oxford University Press.
28.
Holt–LunstadJ. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych–122216–011902
29.
JoinerT. E.JrKatzJ. (1999). Contagion of depressive symptoms and mood: Meta-analytic review and explanations from cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal viewpoints. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.6.2.149
30.
JostJ. T.LedgerwoodA.HardinC. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751–9004.2007.00056.x
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (1999). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (p. 451–477). Cambridge University Press.
33.
KelleyH. H. (1983). The situational origins of human tendencies: A further reason for the formal analysis of structures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283091003
34.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (1994). Enhanced co–orientation in the perception of friends: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.67.6.1024
35.
KhanF.ChongJ. Y.TheisenJ. C.FraleyR. C.YoungJ. F.HankinB. L. (2020). Development and change in attachment: A multiwave assessment of attachment and its correlates across childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1188–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000211
36.
KruschkeJ. K.AguinisH.JooH. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 722–752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428112457829
37.
LeeC. H.OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2020). Maternal and paternal confidence in vaccine safety: Whose attitudes are predictive of children’s vaccination?Vaccine, 38(45), 7057–7062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.020
38.
LemayE. P.JrTenevaN. (2020). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of racial attitudes: Implications for interracial relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000236
39.
LykkenD. T.TellegenA. (1993). Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.65.1.56
40.
MilfontT. L.PoortingaW.SibleyC. G. (2020). Does having children increase environmental concern? Testing parenthood effects with longitudinal data from the New Zealand attitudes and values study. PLoS One, 15(3), e0230361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230361
41.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta–analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
42.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.DerrickJ. L.HarrisB.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness? Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychological Science, 22(5), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611403155
43.
MuthénB. (2010). Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction [Technical Report]. Mplus: Papers using special Mplus features. http://www.statmodel.com/papers.shtml
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 662–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.91.4.662
46.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
47.
ParkJ. H.SchallerM. (2005). Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.013
48.
PasupathiM. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1037//0O33–29O9.127.5.651
49.
ReidC. A.DavisJ. L.GreenJ. D. (2019). Whatever it takes: Attitude alignment in close relationships following third-party rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12322
50.
RobinsR. W.CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70(6), 925–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–6494.05028
51.
SelsL.CabrietoJ.ButlerE.ReisH.CeulemansE.KuppensP. (2020). The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000212
52.
SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497593
53.
SibleyC. G. (2018). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand attitudes and values study. NZAVS Technical Documents, e01.
54.
SinclairS.LoweryB. S.HardinC. D.ColangeloA. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.89.4.583
55.
SkorinkoJ. L.SinclairS. (2018). Shared reality through social tuning of implicit prejudice. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.011
56.
StokerL.JenningsM. K. (1995). Life–cycle transitions and political participation: The case of marriage. American Political Science Review, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082435
57.
WagnerT. R. (2011). Resistance to persuasion in committed romantic relationships: Reactance effects of forewarning and message explicitness. Ohio Communication Journal, 49, 15–42.
58.
ZieglerC. N.GolbeckJ. (2007). Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decision Support Systems, 43, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
