Elections and pandemics highlight how much one’s safety depends on fellow community members, a realization that is especially threatening when this collective perceives political realities inconsistent with one’s own. Two longitudinal studies examined how people restored safety to social bonds when everyday experience suggested that fellow community members inhabited inconsistent realities. We operationalized consensus political realities through the negativity of daily nationwide social media posts mentioning President Trump (Studies 1 and 2), and the risks of depending on fellow community members through the pending transition to a divided Congress during the 2018 election season (Study 1), and escalating daily U.S. COVID-19 infections (Study 2). On days that revealed people could not count on fellow community members to perceive the same reality of President Trump’s stewardship they perceived, being at greater risk from the judgment and behavior of the collective community motivated people to find greater happiness in their family relationships.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490–1528.
2.
BlantonH.StrautsE.PerezM. (2012). Partisan identification as a predictor of cortisol response to election news. Political Communication, 29, 447–460.
3.
CalantoneR. J.WarshawP. R. (1985). Negating the effects of fear appeals in election campaigns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 627–633.
4.
CombsD. J. Y.KellerP. S. (2010). Politicians and trustworthiness: Acting contrary to self-interest enhances trustworthiness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 328–339.
5.
DaiH.MilkmanK. L.RiisJ. (2015). Put your imperfections behind you: Temporal landmarks spur goal initiation when they signal new beginnings. Psychological Science, 26, 1927–1936.
6.
EikenberryS. E.MancusoM.IboiE.PhanT.EidenberryK.KuangY.KostelichE.GumelA. B. (2020). To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling, 5, 293–308.
7.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147.
8.
GoldsteinH.RasbashJ.PlewisI.DraperD.BrownW.YangM.WoodhouseG.HealyM. (1998). A user’s guide to MlwiN. Multilevel models project, Institute of education. University of London.
9.
GriffinD. W.RossL. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference and human misunderstanding. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 319–359). Academic Press.
10.
HardinD. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In SorrentinoM. R.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). Guilford Press.
11.
HeineS. J.ProulxT.VohsV. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.
12.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437–458.
13.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.NashK.ProulxT.QuirinM. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219–286). Elsevier.
14.
JosephK.Swire-ThompsonB.MasugaH.BaumM. A.LazerD. (2019, June11–14). Polarized, together: Comparing partisan support for Trump’s Tweets using survey and platform-based measures [Proceeding]. Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019), Münich, Germany.
15.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007.
16.
JostJ. T.van der LindenS.PanogopoulosC.HardinC. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 77–83.
17.
KoranyiN.MeissnerF. (2015). Handing over the reins: Neutralizing negative attitudes toward dependence in response to reciprocal romantic liking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 685–691.
18.
LamarcheV. M.MurrayS. L. (2014). Selectively myopic? Self-esteem and attentional bias in response to potential relationship threats. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 786–795.
19.
LyuW.WehbyG. L. (2020). Community use of face masks and COVID-19: Evidence from a natural experiment of state mandates in the U.S. Health Affairs, 39(8), 1419–1425.
20.
MathieuJ. E.AguinisH.CulpepperS. A.ChenG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966.
21.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels of processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459.
22.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.DerrickJ.HarrisB.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness: Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction in newlyweds. Psychological Science, 22, 619–626.
23.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (2017). Motivated cognition in relationships: The pursuit of belonging. Routledge.
24.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W.DoldermanD. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581.
25.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
26.
MurrayS. L.LamarcheV.GomillionS.SeeryM. D.KondrakC. (2017). In defense of commitment: The curative power of violated expectations in relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 627–729.
27.
MurrayS. L.LamarcheV.SeeryM. D.JungH. Y.BrickmanC. (2021). The social safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 99–130.
28.
PeetzJ.WilsonA. E. (2013). The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 249–266.
29.
PeetzJ.WilsonA. E. (2014). Marking time: Selective use of temporal landmarks as barriers between current and future selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 44–56.
30.
PlusninN.PeppingC. A.KashimaE. S. (2018). The role of close relationships in terror management: A systematic review and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 307–346.
31.
SigallH.MillsJ. (1998). Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 218–226.
32.
StantonS. J.LaBarK. S.SainiE. K.KuhnC. M.BeehnerJ. C. (2010). Stressful politics: Voters’ cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 768–774.
33.
TovW.DienerD. (2008). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In SullivanB. A.SnyderM.SullivanJ. L. (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction (pp. 323–342). Blackwell.
34.
TrawalterS.ChungV. S.DeSantisA. S.SimonC. D.AdamE. K. (2012). Physiological stress responses to the 2008 U. S. presidential election: The role of policy preferences and social dominance orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 333–345.
35.
WilliamsD. R.MedlockM. M. (2017). Health effects of dramatic societal events—Ramifications of the recent presidential election. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 2295–2299.
36.
ZayasV.ShodaY. (2015). Love you? Hate you? Maybe it’s both: Evidence that significant others trigger bivalent-priming. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 56–64.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
