We suggest that the effects of needs for security and certainty (NSC) on economic beliefs result from potentially competing dispositional (political engagement) and contextual (the country-level political narrative around the welfare state) influences. An analysis of data from the 2016 European Social Survey (N = 40,870) showed that at low levels of political engagement, NSC is associated with left-wing beliefs. However, at high levels of political engagement, the NSC effects are conditional on a country’s welfare state model: NSC is related to right-wing beliefs in Liberal, Continental, and Southern types, but the effects are nonsignificant in the Nordic type and the reverse under the Eastern type. Analysis of 2018 round of the same survey (N = 45,575) corroborated the main findings (except the Southern type for which NSC effects were nonsignificant). This study advances knowledge on the psychological roots of economic beliefs and contributes to the understanding of people’s political choices.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BobbioN. (1996). Left and right: The significance of a political distinction. University of Chicago Press
BonoliG. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two dimensional approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372
6.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.
7.
ConverseP. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74.
8.
CrowsonH. M. (2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. The Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRL.143.5.449-463
9.
CzarnekG.KossowskaM. (2019). Openness and self-enhancement are predictors of cultural and economic beliefs: An analysis of European countries across 15 years. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q2s35
10.
DeaconB. (1993). Developments in East European social policy. In JonesC. (Ed.), New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 177–197). Routledge.
11.
EkstromP. D.FedericoC. M. (2019). Personality and political preferences over time: Evidence from a multiwave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 398–412.
12.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press
13.
Esping-AndersenG. (1996). After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy. In Esping-AndersenG. (Ed.), Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies (pp. 1–31). Sage
14.
European Social Survey (2016). Round 8: Data file edition 2.1. NSD — Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway — Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016
15.
FedericoC. M.EkstromP. D. (2018). The political self: How identity aligns preferences with epistemic needs. Psychological Science, 29(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617748679
16.
FedericoC. M.JohnstonC. D.LavineH. G. (2014). Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002550
17.
FedericoC. M.MalkaA. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477
18.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity: Understanding political ideology. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
19.
FengerH. M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–30.
20.
FerreraM. (1996). The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
21.
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2018). Visualizing fit and lack of fit in complex regression models with predictor effect plots and partial residuals. Journal of Statistical Software, 87(9), 1–27.
22.
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
23.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Social Review, 104, 111–133.
24.
GolecA. (2002). Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33, 5–12.
25.
GoodinR. E.RobertsK. W. S. (1975). The ethical voter. American Political Science Review, 69, 926–928.
26.
GrigoryanL.SchwartzS. H. (2020). Values and attitudes towards cultural diversity: Exploring alternative moderators of the value–attitude link. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220929077
HoogheM.ReeskensT.StolleD.TrappersA. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe: A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325286
JohnstonC. D. (2013). Dispositional sources of economic protectionism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(2), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft004
31.
JohnstonC. D.LavineH. G.FedericoC. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
32.
JohnstonC. D.OllerenshawT. (2020). How different are cultural and economic ideology?Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.008
33.
JohnstonC. D.WronskiJ. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12068
34.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
35.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
36.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.SullivanB. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127
KossowskaM.HielA. V. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24(3), 501–518.
39.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
40.
LeibfriedS. (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European community. In FergeZ.KolbergJ. E. (Eds.), Social policy in a changing Europe. Campus Verlag.
LewisG. J. (2018). Early-childhood conduct problems predict economic and political discontent in adulthood: Evidence from two large, longitudinal UK cohorts. Psychological Science, 29(5), 711–722.
LüdeckeD. (2018). ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
45.
MalkaA.LelkesY.SotoC. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072
46.
MalkaA.SotoC. J. (2014). How encompassing is the effect of negativity bias on political conservatism?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 320–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002653
47.
MalkaA.SotoC. J. (2015). Rigidity of the economic right? Menu-independent and menu-dependent influences of psychological dispositions on political attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414556340
48.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.InzlichtM.LelkesY. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170
49.
NapierJ. L.HuangJ.VonaschA. J.BarghJ. A. (2018). Superheroes for change: Physical safety promotes socially (but not economically) progressive attitudes among conservatives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2315
50.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2012). Does personality matter? Openness correlates with vote choice, but particularly for politically sophisticated voters. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.09.001
51.
OwensL. A.PedullaD. S. (2014). Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces, 92(3), 1087–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot101
52.
PoleseA.MorrisJ.KovácsB.HarboeI. (2014). “Welfare states” and social policies in Eastern Europe and the former USSR: Where informality fits in?Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.902368
53.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
RoetsA.CornelisI.Van HielA. (2014). Openness as a predictor of political orientation and conventional and unconventional political activism in Western and Eastern Europe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 53–63.
Saint-ArnaudS.BernardP. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51(5), 499–527.
58.
SchwartzS. H.MelechG.LehmannA.BurgessS.HarrisM.OwensV. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542.
59.
ThorisdottirH.JostJ. T.LiviatanI.ShroutP. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008
60.
United Nations (2020). World Social Report 2020: Inequality in a Rapidly Changing World. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/7f5d0efc-en (Accessed: August 2 2020).
VerkasaloM.LönnqvistJ.E.LipsanenJ.HelkamaK. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21-item Portrait Values Questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 780–792.
63.
WeedenJ.KurzbanR. (2017). Self-interest is often a major determinant of issue attitudes. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12392
64.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
