Although right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are the two most studied individual difference correlates of prejudice, debate remains over their status as enduring constructs that precede generalized prejudice. We contribute to this discussion using 10 annual waves of longitudinal data from a nationwide random sample of adults to investigate the stability and temporal precedence of RWA, SDO, and prejudice among members of an ethnic majority group (Ns = 23,383–47,217). Results reveal high wave-to-wave rank-order stability for RWA, SDO, and generalized prejudice. Adjusting for their between-person stability, RWA and SDO predicted within-person increases in generalized prejudice. Results replicated when predicting (a) prejudice toward three specific minority groups (namely, Māori, Pacific Islanders, and Asians) and (b) anti-minority beliefs. These findings demonstrate that RWA and SDO are highly stable over 10 consecutive years and that they independently precede within-person annual increases in generalized prejudice and anti-minority beliefs.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24(4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.746
4.
BerghR.AkramiN.SidaniusJ.SibleyC. G. (2016). Is group membership necessary for understanding generalized prejudice? A re-evaluation of why prejudices are interrelated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000064
5.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660
6.
BrattC.SidaniusJ.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ. (2016). Shaping the development of prejudice: Latent growth modeling of the influence of social dominance orientation on outgroup affect in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12), 1617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216666267
7.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
8.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
9.
ChirumboloA.LeoneL.DesimoniM. (2016). The interpersonal roots of politics: Social value orientation, socio-political attitudes and prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.001
10.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.Al RamiahA.WagnerU.VertovecS.HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), 3996–4000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320901111
11.
CichockaA.DhontK.MakwanaA. P. (2017). On self-love and outgroup hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2114
12.
CohrsJ. C.AsbrockF. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.545
13.
CohrsJ. C.StelzlM. (2010). How ideological attitudes predict host society members’ attitudes toward immigrants: Exploring cross-national differences. Journal of Social Issues, 66(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01670.x
14.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
15.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
16.
DuriezB.Van HielA.KossowskaM. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x
17.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
18.
FunkC. L.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.EavesL. J.HibbingJ. R. (2013). Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations. Political Psychology, 34(6), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00915.x
19.
GrimmK. J.RamN.EstabrookR. (2017). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. The Guilford Press.
20.
GuimondS.DambrunM.MichinovN.DuarteS. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
21.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
22.
HamleyL.HoukamauC. A.OsborneD.BarlowF. K.SibleyC. G. (2020). Ingroup love or outgroup hate (or both)? Mapping distinct bias profiles in the population. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219845919
23.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
24.
HuangL.-L.LiuJ. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.006
25.
KleppestøT. H.CzajkowskiN. O.VassendO.RøysambE.EftedalN. H.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.KunstJ. R.ThomsenL. (2019). Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17741–17746. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818711116
26.
KreindlerS. A. (2005). A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1
27.
KteilyN. S.HoA. K.SidaniusJ. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.007
28.
KteilyN. S.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or “mere effect”? Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009
29.
LehmillerJ. J.SchmittM. T. (2007). Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 704–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.383
30.
LudekeS.JohnsonW.BouchardT. J. (2013). “Obedience to traditional authority:” A heritable factor underlying authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(4), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.018
31.
MatićJ.LöwA.BratkoD. (2019). Personality and ideological bases of anti-immigrant prejudice among Croatian youth. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(13), 2387–2406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1444470
32.
McFarlandS. G.AdelsonS. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice[Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
33.
MorrisonK. R.FastN. J.YbarraO. (2009). Group status, perceptions of threat, and support for social inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.004
34.
MorrisonK. R.YbarraO. (2008). The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.006
35.
MorrisonK. R.YbarraO. (2009). Symbolic threat and social dominance among liberals and conservatives: SDO reflects conformity to political values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.606
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2020). Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103979
38.
OsborneD.YogeeswaranK.SibleyC. G. (2017). Culture-specific ideologies undermine collective action support: Examining the legitimizing effects of postcolonial belief systems. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216682352
39.
SatherleyN.SibleyC. G. (2018). A dual process model of post-colonial ideology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.003
40.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KappenD. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127166
41.
SibleyC. G. (2010). The dark duo of post-colonial ideology: A model of symbolic exclusion and historical negation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(1), 106–123.
42.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
43.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H.DuckittJ.KhanS. S. (2008). Social representations of history and the legitimation of social inequality: The form and function of historical negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.449
44.
SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Ideology and post-colonial society. Advances in Political Psychology, 37(1), 115–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12323
45.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
46.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127184
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
