Using a dual-process model (DPM) framework, this research examined whether right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are differentially associated with adolescent delinquency. In Study 1 (N = 847; Mage = 15.96) and Study 2 (N = 340; Mage = 16.64), adolescents completed measures of RWA, SDO, and engagement in different forms of delinquency. In Study 2, adolescents also reported their beliefs about obeying different laws. Across both studies, adolescents who endorsed greater RWA engaged in lower levels of delinquency and those who endorsed greater SDO engaged in higher levels of delinquency. Findings from Study 2 suggest that these associations are contingent on the domain-specific purpose of the law being violated and are also present with adolescents’ beliefs about their obligation to obey laws. These results extend the DPM, demonstrating that RWA and SDO are differentially linked with youth delinquency.
AllenJ. P.PorterM. R.McFarlandF. C.MarshP.McElhaneyK. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747-760.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1998a). The other “authoritarian personality.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
5.
AltemeyerB. (1998b). The 20-item RWA scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
6.
BrattC. (2011). Routine activities theory. In LevesqueR. J. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 2421-2425). New York, NY: Springer.
7.
DiegoM. A.FieldT. M.SandersC. E. (2003). Academic performance, popularity, and depression predict adolescent substance use. Adolescence, 38, 35-42.
8.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-114.
9.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696.
10.
DuckittJ. (2009). Punishment attitudes: Their social and psychological bases. In BieneckS.OswaldM. E.Hupfeld-HeinemannJ. (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 75-92). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1894.
12.
DuriezB.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2007). In search of the antecedents of adolescent authoritarianism: The relative contribution of parental goal promotion and parenting style dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 21, 507-527.
13.
FerrisK. A.OosterhoffB.MetzgerA. (2013). Organized activity involvement among rural youth: Gender differences in associations between activity type and developmental outcomes. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28, 1-15.
14.
HeavenP. C.BucciS. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15, 49-56.
15.
LaFleurJ.ShawA.CouttsS.LarsonJ. (2013). The Opportunity Gap: Is your state providing equal access to education? Retrieved from http://projects.propublica.org/schools/
16.
LanctôtN.CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). Delinquent behavior, official delinquency, and gender: Consequences for adulthood functioning and well-being. Criminology, 45,131-157.
17.
LippaR.AradS. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
18.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
19.
LoeberR. (1990). Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1-41.
20.
MatsuedaR. L.KreagerD. A.HuizingaD. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71, 95-122.
21.
MayeuxL. (2014). Understanding popularity and relational aggression in adolescence: The role of social dominance orientation. Social Development, 23, 502-517.
22.
McAdamsD. P.OlsonB. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517-542.
23.
MetzgerA.OosterhoffB.PalmerC. A.FerrisK. (2014). Dimensions of citizenship: Associations among adolescents’ sociopolitical values and civic judgments. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47, 443-448.
24.
MillerK. E.MelnickM. J.BarnesG. M.SaboD.FarrellM. P. (2007). Athletic involvement and adolescent delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 711-723.
25.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
26.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
27.
OosterhoffB.FerrisK. A.MetzgerA. (2014). Adolescents’ sociopolitical values in the context of organized activity involvement. Youth & Society (pp. 1-21). Advance online publication.
28.
OosterhoffB.FerrisK. A.PalmerC. A.MetzgerA. (2016). Longitudinal associations among adolescents’ organized activity involvement and sociopolitical values. Social Development (pp. 1-14). Advance online publication.
29.
OosterhoffB.MetzgerA. (2016). Domain specificity in adolescents’ concepts of laws: Associations among beliefs and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 139-154.
30.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635-655.
31.
PetherickW.SinnamonG. (2009). Motivations: Offender & victim perspectives. In PetherickW. (Ed.), Profiling and serial crime, third edition: Theoretical and practical issues (pp. 393-430). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
32.
PoteatV. P.EspelageD. L.GreenH. D.Jr. (2007). The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1040-1050.
33.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
34.
PrattoF.StallworthL. M.SidaniusJ.SiersB. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.
35.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.
36.
SarracinoD.PresaghiF.DegniS.InnamoratiM. (2011). Sex-specific relationships among attachment security, social values, and sensation seeking in early adolescence: Implications for adolescents’ externalizing problem behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 541-554.
37.
SaucierG. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366-385.
38.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279.
39.
SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.HoA. K.SibleyC.DuriezB. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313-323.
40.
SimonsR. L.StewartE.GordonL. C.CongerR. D.ElderG. E. (2002). A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology, 40, 401-434.
41.
Son HingL. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P.McBrideM. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67-81.
42.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
UllmanJ. B.BentlerP. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In SchinkaJ. A.VelicerW. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 607-634). New York, NY: John Wiley.
45.
Vah HielA.MervieldeI. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976.
46.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
