The Dark Factor of Personality (D) is conceptualized as the basic disposition out of which “dark” traits arise as specific manifestations. We herein critically test this conceptualization across nine dark traits in a 4-year longitudinal study with N = 1,261 (n = 470 at the second measurement occasion, employing full information maximum likelihood estimation) adults from the general population. Results strongly support the conceptualization of D. Specifically, D (1) showed high rank-order stability (higher than any of the dark traits), substantiating that it represents a basic disposition; (2) longitudinally predicted individual differences in all dark traits; and (3) accounted for personality changes in dark traits. Additionally, we investigated the pattern of mean-level change of D and the dark traits. In line with the maturity principle of personality development, D (and most dark traits) decreased with age.
BringmannL. F.EronenM. I. (2018). Don’t blame the model: Reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychological Review, 125, 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000108
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
5.
CarlsonK. S.GjerdeP. F. (2009). Preschool personality antecedents of narcissism in adolescence and young adulthood: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.003
6.
CarlsonK. S.GjerdeP. F. (2010). Corrigendum to “Preschool personality antecedents of narcissism in adolescence and young adulthood: A 20-year longitudinal study” [J. Res. Pers. 43 (2009), 570–578]. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.006
7.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
8.
CollisonK. L.VizeC. E.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of a five factor model measure of Machiavellianism. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1401–1407. http://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000637
DiebelsK. J.LearyM. R.ChonD. (2018). Individual differences in selfishness as a major dimension of personality: A reinterpretation of the sixth personality factor. Review of General Psychology, 22, 367–376. http://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000155
11.
DweckC. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
12.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2009). Using Δgoodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802561311
13.
FisherJ. H.BrownJ. L. (2018). A prospective, longitudinal examination of the influence of childhood home and school contexts on psychopathic characteristics in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 2041–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0861-2
14.
GerbasiM. E.PrenticeD. A. (2013). The self- and other-interest inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 495–514. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033483
15.
GroszM. P.GöllnerR.RoseN.SpenglerM.TrautweinU.RauthmannJ. F.WetzelE.RobertsB. W. (2019). The development of narcissistic admiration and machiavellianism in early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 467–482. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000174
16.
HilbigB. E.ThielmannI.KleinS. A.MoshagenM.ZettlerI. (in press). The dark core of personality and socially aversive psychopathology. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12577
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Praeger.
19.
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27, 521–531. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
20.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
21.
KlimstraT. A.JeronimusB. F.SijtsemaJ. J.DenissenJ. J. A. (2020). The unfolding dark side: Age trends in dark personality features. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103915
22.
MaaßU.ZieglerM. (2017). Narcissistic self-promotion is not moderated by the strength of situational cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 482–488. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.008
23.
MarcusD. K.Zeigler-HillV. (2015). A big tent of dark personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12185
24.
MarcusD. K.Zeigler-HillV.MercerS. H.NorrisA. L. (2014). The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment, 26, 563–574. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0036039
25.
McArdleJ.HamagamiF. (2004). Methods for dynamic change hypotheses. In MontfortK.OudJ. H. L.SatorraA. (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models (pp. 295–335). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2017). Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6-year cohort-sequential growth model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 510–526. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000121
27.
MooreC.DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.BakerV. L.MayerD. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65, 1–48. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x
28.
MoshagenM.AuerswaldM. (2018). On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 318–336. http://doi.org/10.1037/met0000122
MoshagenM.HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125, 656–688. http://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111
31.
MoshagenM.ZettlerI.HilbigB. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000778
32.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 183–204. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
NewsomJ. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.
35.
O’MearaA.DaviesJ.HammondS. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the short sadistic impulse scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment, 23, 523–531. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022400
36.
PaulhusD. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737
37.
PaulhusD. L.JonesD. N. (2015). Measures of dark personalities. In BoyleG. J.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 562–594). Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00020-6
RobertsB. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and Assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.015
40.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3
41.
RobertsB. W.NickelL. B. (2017). A critical evaluation of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In SpechtJ. (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 157–177). Elsevier Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804674-6.00011-9
42.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
SchermerJ. A.JonesD. N. (2020). The behavioral genetics of the dark triad core versus unique trait components: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109701
45.
SijtsemaJ. J.GarofaloC.JansenK.KlimstraT. A. (2019). Disengaging from evil: Longitudinal associations between the dark triad, moral disengagement, and antisocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47, 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00519-4
46.
SpechtJ.BleidornW.DenissenJ. J. A.HenneckeM.HuttemanR.KandlerC.LuhmannM.OrthU.ReitzA. K.ZimmermannJ. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 28, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1966
47.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024950
48.
VernonP. A.VillaniV. C.VickersL. C.HarrisJ. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 445–452. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
49.
VizeC. E.LynamD. R.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 101–111. http://doi.org/10.1037/per0000222
50.
WeigelR. H.HessingD. J.ElffersH. (1999). Egoism: Concept, measurement and implications for deviance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 349–378. http://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908401777
51.
YuanK.-H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200. http://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
