The focus theory of normative conduct asserts that distinct processes are involved in responding to injunctive norms versus descriptive norms. This research tested the prediction that guilt would be more strongly involved in motivating conformity to injunctive than descriptive norms. Study 1 demonstrates that people anticipate feeling guiltier following injunctive than descriptive norm violations. Studies 2 and 3 demonstrate that guilt proneness and state-level guilt enhance the persuasiveness of messages framed with injunctive norms but not control-framed or descriptive norm–framed messages. Finally, Study 4 shows that a guilt-arousing public service announcement is more effective if framed using an injunctive norm than a descriptive norm or a control message. These results augment understanding of the different ways that injunctive and descriptive norms influence behavior and have applied implications for social norms marketing interventions.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation. Psychological Science, 18, 524–530.
2.
AronsonE.CarlsmithJ. M. (1963). Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 584–588.
3.
AschS. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.
4.
BambergS.HuneckeM.BlöbaumA. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190–203.
5.
BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1967). When does a harm-doer compensate a victim?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(4), 435–441.
6.
CialdiniR. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
7.
CialdiniR. B. (2012). The focus theory of normative conduct. In van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsT. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 295−312). Sage.
8.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
9.
CohenT. R. (2010). Moral emotions and unethical bargaining: The differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiations. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 569–579.
10.
CohenT. R.PanterA. T.TuranN. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behavior from guilt proneness. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2
11.
CohenT. R.WolfS. T.PanterA. T.InskoC. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947–966.
12.
CoulterR. G.PintoM. B. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: What are their effects?Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 697–705.
13.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121–136.
14.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1970). Norms and normative behaviour: Field studies of social interdependence. In MacaulayJ.BerkowitzL. (Eds.), Altruism and helping behaviour (pp. 83–102). Academic Press.
15.
De HoogeI. E.ZeelenbergM.BreugelmansS. M. (2007). Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1025–1042.
16.
De RuyterK.WetzelsM. (2000). With a little help from my fans—Extending models of prosocial behaviour to explain “supporters” intentions to buy soccer club shares. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 387–409.
17.
DeutschM.GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629−636.
18.
FlynnF. J.SchaumbergR. L. (2012). When feeling bad leads to feeling good: Guilt-proneness and affective organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 124.
19.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168.
20.
GiguèreB.LalondeR. N.TaylorD. M. (2014). Drinking too much and feeling bad about it? How group identification moderates experiences of guilt and shame following norm transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 617–632.
21.
HainmuellerJ.MummoloJ.XuY. (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27(2), 163–192.
22.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
23.
HayesA. F.MontoyaA. K. (2017). A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing an interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(1), 1–30.
HuhmannB. A.BrothertonT. P. (1997). A content analysis of guilt appeals in popular magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 35–45.
26.
IliesR.PengA. C.SavaniK.DimotakisN. (2013). Guilty and helpful: An emotion-based reparatory model of voluntary work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1051−1059.
27.
JacobsonR. P.HoodJ. N.JacobsonK. J. (2017). The effects of moral emotional traits on workplace bullying perpetration. Ethics & Behavior, 27(7), 527–546.
28.
JacobsonR. P.MarchiondoL.JacobsonK. J. L.HoodJ. N. (2020). The synergistic effect of injunctive and descriptive norm perceptions on counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 191–209.
29.
JacobsonR. P.MortensenC. R.CialdiniR. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433.
30.
JacobsonR. P.MortensenC. R.JacobsonK. J. L.CialdiniR. B. (2015). Self-control moderates the effectiveness of influence attempts highlighting injunctive social norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 718−726.
31.
KetelaarT.AuW. T. (2003). The effects of guilt on behavior of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429–453.
32.
KredentserM. S.FabrigarL. R.SmithS. M.FultonK. (2012). Following what people think we should do versus what people actually do elaboration as a moderator of the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 341−347.
33.
MarschallD. E.SanftnerJ. L.TangneyJ. P. (1994). The State Shame and Guilt Scale (SSGS). George Mason University.
34.
MorrisM. W.HongY. Y.ChiuC. Y.LiuZ. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1−13.
35.
MortensenC. R.CialdiniR. B. (2010). Full-cycle social psychology for theory and application. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 53–63.
36.
NeighborsC.LarimerM. E.LewisM. A. (2004). Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 434–447.
37.
OnwezenM. C.AntonidesG.BartelsJ. (2013). The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153.
38.
RussellC. A.ClappJ. D.DeJongW. (2005). Done 4: Analysis of a failed social norms marketing campaign. Health Communication, 17(1), 57–65.
39.
SchultzP. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 25–36.
40.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.
41.
SchwartzS. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4), 349–364.
42.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
43.
StokF. M.de RidderD. T. (2019). The focus theory of normative conduct. In SassenbergK.VliekM. L. W. (Eds.), Social psychology in action (pp. 95–110). Springer.
44.
StokF. M.de RidderD. T.de VetE.de WitJ. B. (2014). Don’t tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(1), 52−64.
45.
StuewigJ.TangneyJ. P.HeigelC.HartyL.McCloskeyL. (2010). Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 91–102.
46.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
47.
TesserA.CampbellJ.MicklerS. (1983). The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(3), 217–233.
48.
ThøgersenJ. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261.
49.
Van SelstM.JolicoeurP. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(3), 631–650.
50.
WerchC. E.PappasD. M.CarlsonJ. M.DiClementeC. C.ChallyP. MSinderJ. S. (2000). Results of a social norm intervention to prevent binge drinking among first-year residential college students. Journal of American College Health, 49, 85–92.
51.
WiltermuthS. S.CohenT. R. (2014). “I’d only let you down”: Guilt proneness and the avoidance of harmful interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 925–942.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
