The present research demonstrates intergenerational influences on collective action participation, whereby parents’ past and current participation in collective action (descriptive family norms) shape their children’s participation in conventional and radical collective action via injunctive family norms (perception that parents value such participation). Two unique data sets were used: dyads of activist parents and their adult children (Study 1, N = 100 dyads) and student activists who participated in a yearlong, three-wave longitudinal study (Study 2, Ns wave 1 = 1,221, Wave 2 = 960, and Wave 3 = 917). Parents’ past and current participation directly and indirectly predicted children’s protest participation in Study 1, while Study 2 showed a similar pattern longitudinally: Perceptions of parents’ participation (descriptive family norm) and approval (injunctive family norm) predicted change in collective action participation over time. Together, results highlight family environment as a critical setting for the intergenerational transmission of protest.
AbramsD.PalmerS. B.RutlandA.CameronL.Van de VyverJ. (2014). Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: Development of the black sheep effect. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032461
2.
BäckE. A.BäckH.SivénD. (2018). Why engage in collective action? The conditional effect of social support and efficacy on protest participation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1422128
BlackwoodL. M.LouisW. R. (2012). If it matters for the group then it matters to me: Collective action outcomes for seasoned activists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 72–92.
5.
CalhounC. (1993). “New social movements” of the early nineteenth century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171431
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
8.
ColladoS.StaatsH.SanchoP. (2019). Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 288–314.
9.
CornejoM.RochaC.CastroD.VarelaM.CarvachoH.ManziJ.GonzálezR.Jiménez-MoyaG.Álvarez-WerthB.ValdenegroD.CheyreM.LivingstoneA. (2020). The intergenerational transmission of participation in collective action: The role of conversation and political practices in the family[Manuscript submitted for publication]. Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
10.
Dotti SaniG. M.QuarantaM. (2015). Chips off the old blocks? The political participation patterns of parents and children in Italy. Social Science Research, 50, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.002
11.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604.
12.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x
13.
EpsteinM.BaileyJ. A.FurlongM.SteegerC. M.HillK. G. (2019). An intergenerational investigation of the associations between parental marijuana use trajectories and child functioning. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000510
14.
ErikssonK.StrimlingP.CoultasJ. C. (2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 59–69.
15.
GöckeritzS.SchultzP. W.RendónT.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 514–523.
16.
GreenC. W.AdamsA. M.TurnerC. W. (1988). Development and validation of the school interracial climate scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(2), 241–259.
17.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
18.
HiltonD. J.LiuJ. H. (2017). History as the narrative of a people: From function to structure and content. Memory Studies, 10(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701612
19.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854264
20.
KlandermansB. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.
21.
KlandermansB. (2013). Motivation and types of motives (instrumental; identity, ideological motives). In SnowD. A.Della PortaD.KlandermansB.McAdamD. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm133
22.
LouisW. R.TaylorD. M.DouglasR. L. (2005). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 355–374.
MazzoccoP. J.GreenM. C.SasotaJ. A.JonesN. W. (2010). This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 361–368.
25.
McAdamD. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.
26.
MeyerD. S.TarrowS. (Eds.). (1998). A movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century, 1–28. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
PaluckE. L.ShepherdH. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030015
30.
QuintelierE.HoogheM.BadescuG. (2007, October8–10). Parental influence on adolescents’ political participation: A comparison of Belgian, Canadian and Romanian survey data[Paper presentation]. International Conference on Political Socialisation. Örebro, Sweden.
31.
SearsD. O.BrownC. (2013). Childhood and adult political development. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 59–95). Oxford University Press.
32.
SearsD. O.LevyS. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In SearsD. O.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 60–109). Oxford University Press.
33.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper and Row.
34.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 647–666.
35.
SmithL. G.ThomasE. F.McGartyC. (2015). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543–557.
36.
SumodheeD.PayneN. (2016). Healthy eating beliefs and intentions of mothers and their adult children: An intergenerational transmission perspective. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(12), 2775–2787. https://doi-org.pucdechile.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1359105315586214
37.
TankardE. M.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
38.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C. (2013). Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: A longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 525–542.
39.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective actions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129.
40.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002
41.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (Eds.). (1999). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership. Psychology Press.
42.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X313774
43.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563
44.
ThomasE. F.ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2019). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879111
45.
ThornberryT. P.Freeman-GallantA.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.SmithC. A. (2003). Linked lives: The intergenerational transmission of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 171–184. http://dx.doi.org.pucdechile.idm.oclc.org/10.1023/A:1022574208366
46.
TillyC.WoodL. J. (2013). Social movements, 1768–2012 (3rd ed.). Paradigm Publishers.
van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199.
49.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
50.
VestergrenS.DruryJ.ChiriacE. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 855–877.
51.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research, 4, 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048399
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
