BaumeisterR. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
ChenY.-y.LiuX.-x.LanT.HongY. (2015). Residential mobility boosts bribe giving. Manuscript under review.
3.
ChiuC. Y.MorrisM.HongY.MenonT. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 247-259.
4.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In LindzeyG.GilbertD.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151-192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
DernéS. (1992). Beyond institutional and impulsive conceptions of self: Family structure and the socially anchored real self. Ethos, 20, 259-288.
6.
ErikssonK.StrimlingP.CoultasJ. C. (2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 59-69.
7.
GelfandM. J.HarringtonJ. R. (2015). The motivational force of descriptive norms: For whom and when are descriptive norms most predictive of behavior?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 1273-1278.
8.
JacobsonR. P.MortensenC. R.CialdiniR. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 433-448.
9.
LiuZ.LiuX.-x.HongY.BrocknerJ.TamK. K.-p.LiY.-m. X. (2015). Is the individual or organization more wrong? Documenting and explaining cross-cultural differences in tolerance for bribery. Manuscript under review.
10.
MazarN.AggarwalP. (2011). Greasing the palm can collectivism promote bribery?Psychological Science, 22, 843-848.
11.
MenonT.MorrisM. W.ChiuC. Y.HongY. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.
12.
MillerD. T.McFarlandC. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In SulsJ. E.WillsT. A. E. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
MorrisM. W.MenonT.AmesD. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169-182.
14.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.
15.
SavaniK.MorrisM. W.NaiduN. V. R. (2012). Deference in Indians’ decision making: Introjected goals or injunctive norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 685-699.
16.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R.TerryD. J.GreenawayK. H.ClarkeM. R.ChengX. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 353-361.
17.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579-584.