Across four studies, we demonstrate a bias against Black women with natural hairstyles in job recruitment. In Study 1, participants evaluated profiles of Black and White female job applicants across a variety of hairstyles. We found that Black women with natural hairstyles were perceived to be less professional, less competent, and less likely to be recommended for a job interview than Black women with straightened hairstyles and White women with either curly or straight hairstyles. We replicated these findings in a controlled experiment in Study 2. In Study 3A and 3B, we found Black women with natural hairstyles received more negative evaluations when they applied for a job in an industry with strong dress norms. Taken together, this article advances the research on biases in the labor market in the age of social media use and highlights the importance of taking an intersectional approach when studying inequity in the workplace.
BarrickM. R.ShafferJ. A.DeGrassiS. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1394–1411.
BiltonC.LearyR. (2002). What can managers do for creativity? Brokering creativity in the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8, 49–64.
5.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
6.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 139–167.
7.
EisenkraftN. (2013). Accurate by way of aggregation: should you trust your intuition-based first impressions?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 277–279.
8.
HackleyC.KoverA. J. (2007). The trouble with creatives: Negotiating creative identity in advertising agencies. International Journal of Advertising, 26, 63–78.
9.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
10.
HewlinP. F. (2009). Wearing the cloak: Antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 727–741.
11.
HoergerM. (2010). Participant dropout as a function of survey length in Internet-mediated university studies: Implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 697–700.
12.
James-ToddT.SenieR.TerryM. B. (2012). Racial/ethnic differences in hormonally-active hair product use: A plausible risk factor for health disparities. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 14, 506–511.
KippingM. (2011). Hollow from the start? Image professionalism in management consulting. Current Sociology, 59, 530–550.
17.
KluemperD. H.RosenP. A. (2009). Future employment selection methods: Evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 567–580.
18.
KyleD. J.MahlerH. I. (1996). The effects of hair color and cosmetic use on perceptions of a female’s ability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 447–455.
19.
MarloweC. M.SchneiderS. L.NelsonC. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11–21.
20.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
21.
McElroyJ. C.SummersJ. K.MooreK. (2014). The effect of facial piercing on perceptions of job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 26–38.
22.
McGeeE. O.KazembeL. (2016). Entertainers or education researchers? The challenges associated with presenting while black. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19, 96–120.
McKennaC. D. (2006). The world’s newest profession: Management consulting in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
25.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2016). Two condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22, 6–27.
26.
OpieT. R.PhillipsK. W. (2015). Hair penalties: The negative influence of natural hair on ratings of Black women’s dominance and professionalism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–14.
PattonT. O. (2006). Hey girl, am I more than my hair? African American women and their struggles with beauty, body image, and hair. NWSA Journal, 18, 24–51.
29.
RafaeliA.PrattM. G. (1993). Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review, 18, 32–55.
RosetteA. S.de LeonR. P.KovalC. Z.HarrisonD. A. (2019). Intersectionality: Connecting experiences of gender with race at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 1–22.
32.
RosetteA. S.DumasT. L. (2007). Hair dilemma: Conform to mainstream expectations or emphasize racial identity. The Duke Journal of Gender, Law & Policy, 14, 407–421.
33.
RudmanL. A.McLeanM. C. (2016). The role of appearance stigma in implicit racial ingroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 374–393.
34.
TaylorP. C. (1999). Malcolm’s conk and Danto’s colors; or, four logical petitions concerning race, beauty, and aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57, 16–20.
35.
UhlmannE. L.HeaphyE.AshfordS. J.ZhuL.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2013). Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 866–886.
WilliamsJ. C.DempseyR (2014). What works for women at work. NYU Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
