Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-5
System Justification and Perceptions of Group-Based Discrimination: Investigating the Temporal Order of the Ideologically Motivated Minimization (or Exaggeration) of Discrimination Across Low- and High-Status Groups
Believing that social systems are fair confers palliative benefits via different mechanisms. Although the minimization of group-based discrimination plays a central role in this process, the direction of this association is contested. We address this debate by using eight waves of nationally representative longitudinal panel data to model the temporal ordering of system justification (SJ) and perceptions of group-based discrimination across ethnic minorities (n = 7,159) and Whites (n = 18,140). Consistent with SJ theory and the original status-legitimacy hypothesis, system-justifying beliefs precede (and reduce) perceptions of group-based discrimination among minorities, whereas the corresponding association is positive and bidirectional for members of the ethnic majority group. These results are the first to demonstrate important asymmetries in both the direction and temporal ordering of SJ and perceptions of group-based discrimination across ethnic minority and majority populations.
AdachiP.WilloughbyT. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549
2.
BahamondesJ.GómezF.BarrientosJ.CárdenasM.GuzmánM. (2020). Numbing the perception of stigma: System justification decreases psychological distress by reducing perceived stigma among gay men and lesbians. Revista de Psicología Social. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1721052
3.
BahamondesJ.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2019). “We look (and feel) better through system justifying lenses”: Evidence of the palliative function of ideology among the disadvantaged. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1391–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219829178
4.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660
5.
BilewiczM.SoralW.MarchlewskaM.WiniewskiM. (2017). When authoritarians confront prejudice. Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate-speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12313
6.
BilligM. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. Sage.
7.
BrandtM. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031751
8.
BranscombeN. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–184.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
10.
CrosbyF.PufallA.SnyderR. C.O’ConnellM.WhalenP. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In CrawfordM.GentryM. (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 79–99). Springer-Verlag.
11.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2016). Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.006
12.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
13.
HamakerE. L. (2012). Why researchers should think “within-person”: A paradigmatic rationale. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). Guilford Press.
14.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
15.
HarrisR.CormackD.TobiasM.YehL. C.TalamaivaoN.MinsterJ.TimutimuR. (2012). The pervasive effects of racism: Experiences of racial discrimination in New Zealand over time and associations with multiple health domains. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.004
16.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1989). The benefits of illusions, the threat of disillusionment, and the limitations of inaccuracy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1989.8.2.158
17.
JostJ. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
18.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
19.
JostJ. T.BurgessD.MossoC. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and the system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). Cambridge University Press.
20.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046
21.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
22.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
23.
JostJ. T.WakslakC. J.TylerT. R. (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. Advances in Group Processes, 25, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25012-5
24.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP. S.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1523–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291475
25.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
26.
LernerM. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer.
27.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
28.
MajorB.GramzowR. H.McCoyS. K.LevinS.SchmaderT.SidaniusJ. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.269
29.
MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2017). Ideology and the maintenance of group inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712051
30.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). Academic Press.
31.
MajorB.SawyerP. J. (2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 89–110). Psychology Press.
32.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
33.
MeyerI. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 38–56.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
37.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
38.
OlsonJ. M.HaferC. L. (2001). Tolerance of personal deprivation. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 157–175). Cambridge University Press.
39.
OwuamalamC. K.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2017). Socially creative appraisals of rejection bolster ethnic migrants’ subjective well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(7), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12444
40.
ReichleB.SchneiderA.MontadaL. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? In MontadaL.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 55–64). Springer.
41.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 168–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000058
42.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT.GarciaA. (2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035754
43.
SenguptaN. K.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2019). On the psychological function of nationalistic “Whitelash.”Political Psychology, 40(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12563
44.
SibleyC. G. (2018). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand attitudes and values study. NZAVS Technical Documents, e01.
45.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
46.
StrongeS.SenguptaN. K.BarlowF. K.OsborneD.HoukamauC. A.SibleyC. G. (2016). Perceived discrimination predicts increased support for political rights and life satisfaction mediated by ethnic identity: A longitudinal analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000074
47.
SuppesA.NapierJ. L.Van der ToornJ. (2019). The palliative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218785156
48.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
49.
TaylorD. M.WrightS. C.MoghaddamF. M.LalondeR. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162006
50.
van der ToornJ.NailP. R.LiviatanI.JostJ. T. (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003
51.
WeinerB.OsborneD.RudolphU. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310387615
52.
WellmanJ. D.LiuX.WilkinsC. L. (2016). Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for affirmative action among White people. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12133
53.
WetherellM.PotterJ. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. Columbia University Press.
54.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412
55.
YogeeswaranK.VerkuytenM.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2018). “I have a dream” of a colorblind nation? Examining the relationship between racial colorblindness, system justification, and support for policies that redress inequalities. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12269
56.
ZyphurM. J.AllisonP. D.TayL.VoelkleM. C.PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.HamakerE. L.ShamsollahiA.PieridesD. C.KovalP.DienerE. (2019). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods, 1–37. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847278
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
