System Justification or Social Dominance? A Multilevel Test of the Ideological Motivators of Perceived Discrimination

Abstract

Although system-justifying beliefs often mitigate perceptions of discrimination, status-based asymmetries in the ideological motivators of perceived discrimination are unknown. Because the content and societal implications of discrimination claims are status-dependant, social dominance orientation (SDO) should motivate perceptions of (reverse) discrimination among members of high-status groups, whereas system justification should motivate the minimization of perceived discrimination among the disadvantaged. We tested these hypotheses using multilevel regressions among a nationwide random sample of New Zealand Europeans (n = 29,169) and ethnic minorities (n = 5,118). As hypothesized, group-based dominance correlated positively with perceived (reverse) discrimination among ethnic-majority group members, whereas system justification correlated negatively with perceived discrimination among the disadvantaged. Furthermore, the proportion of minorities within the region strengthened the victimizing effects of SDO-Dominance, but not SDO-Egalitarianism, among the advantaged. Together, these results reveal status-based asymmetries in the motives underlying perceptions of discrimination and identify a key contextual moderator of this association.

Keywords

system justification social dominance perceived discrimination intergroup threat multilevel modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bahamondes

Gómez

Barrientos

Cárdenas

Guzmán

(2020). Numbing the perception of stigma: System justification decreases psychological distress by reducing perceived stigma among Gay men and Lesbians. Revista de Psicología Social, 35(2), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1721052

Bahamondes

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2019). ‘We look (and feel) better through system justifying lenses’: Evidence of the palliative function of ideology among the disadvantaged. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1391–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219829178

Bahamondes

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2021). System justification and perceptions of group-based discrimination: Investigating the temporal order of the ideologically motivated minimization (or exaggeration) of discrimination across low- and high-status groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620929452

Bahamondes-Correa

(2016). System justification’s opposite effects on psychological well-being: Testing a moderated mediation model in a gay men and Lesbian sample in Chile. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(11), 1537–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1223351

Berbrier

(2000). The victim ideology of White supremacists and White separatists in the United States. Sociological Focus, 33(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2000.10571164

Billig

(1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. SAGE.

Blanz

Mummendey

Mielke

Klink

(1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697–729.

Bonilla-Silva

Goar

Embrick

D. G.

(2006). When Whites flock together: The social psychology of White habitus. Critical Sociology, 32(2–3), 229–253.

Brandt

M. J.

Reyna

(2017). Individual differences in the resistance to social change and acceptance of inequality predict system legitimacy differently depending on the social structure. European Journal of Personality, 31(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2100

10.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2018). Majority no more? The influence of neighborhood racial diversity and salient national Population changes on Whites’ perceptions of racial discrimination. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(5), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2018.4.5.07

11.

Crosby

F. J.

(1984). The denial of personal discrimination. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 371–386.

12.

DiAngelo

(2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for White people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.

13.

Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2004). Aversive racism. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6

14.

Duckitt

(2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284282

15.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2017). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 188–221). Cambridge University Press.

16.

Duckitt

Wagner

du Plessis

Birum

(2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75

17.

Eidelman

Crandall

C. S.

(2009). A psychological advantage for the Status Quo. In Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

Thorisdottir

(Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 85–106). Oxford University Press.

18.

Enders

C. K.

Bandalos

D. L.

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5

19.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

20.

Exeter

Browne

Crengle

Lee

Zhao

(2013). Deprivation and health geography within NZ: 2013 New Zealand Index of multiple deprivation (IMD13). https://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/soph/about/our-departments/epidemiology-and-biostatistics/research/hgd/research-themes/imd.html

21.

Hässler

Ullrich

Bernardino

Shnabel

Laar

C. V.

Valdenegro

Sebben

Tropp

L. R.

Visintin

E. P.

González

Ditlmann

R. K.

Abrams

Selvanathan

H. P.

Branković

Wright

von Zimmermann

Pasek

Aydin

A. L.

Žeželj

. . . Ugarte

L. M.

(2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z

22.

Heck

R. H.

Thomas

S. L.

(2020). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches (4th ed.). Routledge.

23.

Hennes

E. P.

Nam

H. H.

Stern

Jost

J. T.

(2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669

24.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

25.

A. K.

Sidanius

Pratto

Levin

Thomsen

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

(2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765

26.

Janoff-Bulman

(1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. The Free Press.

27.

Jost

J. T.

(2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press.

28.

Jost

J. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x

29.

Jost

J. T.

Burgess

(2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265003

30.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

31.

Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

32.

Jost

J. T.

Thompson

E. P.

(2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403

33.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2006). Dominant ideology threat and the interpersonal consequences of attributions to discrimination. In Levin

van Laar

(Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 45–64). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

34.

Kaiser

C. R.

Dyrenforth

P. S.

Hagiwara

(2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1523–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291475

35.

Kaiser

C. R.

Miller

C. T.

(2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010

36.

Leach

C. W.

Iyer

Pedersen

(2007). Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X99360

37.

Lee

C. H.

Duck

I. M.

Sibley

C. G.

(2017). Ethnic inequality in diagnosis with depression and anxiety disorders. New Zealand Medical Journal, 130(1454), 10–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449012

38.

Lerner

M. J.

(1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5

39.

Lowery

B. S.

Unzueta

M. M.

Knowles

E. D.

Goff

P. A.

(2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961

40.

Major

Gramzow

R. H.

McCoy

S. K.

Levin

Schmader

Sidanius

(2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.269

41.

Major

Quinton

W. J.

McCoy

S. K.

(2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80007-7

42.

Major

Sawyer

P. J.

(2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In Nelson

T. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 89–110). Psychology Press.

43.

Matthews

Levin

Sidanius

(2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30(6), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00733.x

44.

McCoy

S. K.

Major

(2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009

45.

Meyer

I. H.

(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual Issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

46.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

47.

Napier

J. L.

Suppes

Bettinsoli

M. L.

(2020). Denial of gender discrimination is associated with better subjective well-being among women: A system justification account. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2702

48.

Noor

Shnabel

Halabi

Nadler

(2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048

49.

Osborne

Sengupta

N. K.

Sibley

C. G.

(2019). System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12302

50.

Pascoe

E. A.

Richman

L. S.

(2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059.supp

51.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Meertens

R. W.

(1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106

52.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

53.

Phillips

L. T.

Lowery

B. S.

(2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.008

54.

Quillian

(1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096296

55.

Ridgeway

C. L.

(2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimizing ideology. In Jost

J. T.

Major

(Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 257–277). Cambridge University Press.

56.

Schmid

Al Ramiah

Hewstone

(2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956

57.

Schmid

Hewstone

Küpper

Zick

Wagner

(2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511430235

58.

Schmitt

M. T.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 168–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000058

59.

Schmitt

M. T.

Branscombe

N. R.

Kobrynowicz

Owen

(2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282006

60.

Sengupta

N. K.

Osborne

Sibley

C. G.

(2019). On the psychological function of nationalistic “Whitelash.” Political Psychology, 40(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12563

61.

Sengupta

N. K.

Sibley

C. G.

(2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497593

62.

Sibley

C. G.

(2018). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand attitudes and values study. NZAVS Technical Documents, e01. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e01-Sampling-Procedure-and-Sample-Details.pdf

63.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

64.

Simons

D. J.

Shoda

Lindsay

D. S.

(2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

65.

Statistics New Zealand. (2009). Geographic definitions. http://www.stats.govt.nz/

66.

Statistics New Zealand. (2018). 2018 Census ethnic group summaries: Work, income and unpaid activities. http://www.stats.govt.nz/tools_and_services/nzdotstat.aspx

67.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(2017). Intergroup threats. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 131–148). Cambridge University Press.

68.

Stronge

Sengupta

N. K.

Barlow

F. K.

Osborne

Houkamau

C. A.

Sibley

C. G.

(2016). Perceived discrimination predicts increased support for political rights and life satisfaction mediated by ethnic identity: A longitudinal analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000074

69.

Suppes

Napier

J. L.

Van der Toorn

(2019). The palliative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218785156

70.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

71.

Taylor

D. M.

Wright

S. C.

Moghaddam

F. M.

Lalonde

R. N.

(1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162006

72.

Taylor

M. C.

(1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657265

73.

Thomsen

Green

E. G. T.

A. K.

Levin

van Laar

Sinclair

Sidanius

(2010). Wolves in sheep’s clothing: SDO asymmetrically predicts perceived ethnic victimization among White and Latino students across three years. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209348617

74.

UNDP. (2019). Human development report 2019. http://hdr.undp.org

75.

Unzueta

M. M.

Everly

B. A.

Gutiérrez

A. S.

(2014). Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005

76.

Vezzali

Giovannini

(2011). Cross-group friendships, social dominance orientation and secondary transfer effect. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18, 181–194.

77.

Wagner

Christ

Pettigrew

T. F.

Stellmacher

Wolf

(2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900406

78.

Wellman

J. D.

Liu

Wilkins

C. L.

(2016). Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for Affirmative Action among White people. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12133

79.

Wetherell

Potter

(1992). Mapping the language of racism. Columbia University Press.

80.

Wilkins

C. L.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412

81.

Williams

D. R.

Williams-Morris

(2000). Racism and mental health: The African American experience. Ethnicity and Health, 5(3/4), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557800200009356

82.

Young

I. F.

Sullivan

(2016). Competitive victimhood: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.004

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

0.03 MB