Self-disclosure ordinarily benefits individual well-being; however, if someone discloses with an unresponsive listener, self-disclosure may fail to enhance well-being. Because prior research has primarily studied the additive effects of disclosure and listener’s responsiveness on well-being, this study investigated their interactive effects on well-being in romantic relationships. Because attachment orientation is closely associated with needs for intimacy, we further inquired into moderating effects of attachment on associations between intimacy and well-being. One-hundred fifteen cohabiting couples completed 21 daily diaries in which they recorded their experiences interacting with their partners. High self-disclosure during interactions that lacked expressed understanding yielded negative rather than positive outcomes. Multiple interactions between participants’ and partners’ attachment insecurity and intimacy were especially associated with depressive symptoms and relationship satisfaction. Results highlight the importance of the relational context of self-disclosure and well-being.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure?Assessment, 18(1), 67-87.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA.
3.
BeachS.R.H. (2001). Marital therapy for co‐occurring marital discord and depression (pp. 205–224). In BeachS.R.H. (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice. American Psychological Association.
4.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P.& Ebooks Corporation. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research (Methodology in the social sciences). Guilford Press.
5.
BowlbyJ. (1982) Attachment and loss (2nd ed., Vol.1). Basic Books. (Original work published 1969).
6.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.). In Attachment theory and close relationships. (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
7.
BrunetP. M.SchmidtL. A. (2007). Is shyness context specific? Relation between shyness and online self-disclosure with and without a live webcam in young adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 938–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.09.001
8.
CampbellS. B.RenshawK. D. (2013). PTSD symptoms, disclosure, and relationship distress: Explorations of mediation and associations over time. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27(5), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.06.007
9.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510
10.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004a). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363
11.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004b). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy. In MashekD.J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 163–188). : Erlbaum.
12.
CollinsN.L.ReadS. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
13.
CordovaJ. V. (2003). Behavior analysis and the scientific study of couples. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3(4), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100776
14.
CoxM. J.PaleyB. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 12(5), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01259
15.
CulpL. N.BeachS. R. H. (1998). Marriage and depressive symptoms: The role and bases of self-esteem differ by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 647-663.
16.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Sage.
17.
DienerE.HeintzelmanS. J.KushlevK.TayL.WirtzD.LutesL. D.OishiS. (2016). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 58(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Towards a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00033.x
20.
FinkbeinerN. M.EpsteinN. B.FalconierM. K. (2013). Low intimacy as a mediator between depression and clinic couple relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20, 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01415.x
21.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615-625.
GabrielS.KawakamiK.BartakC.KangS.-J.MannN. (2010). Negative self-synchronization: Will I change to be like you when it is bad for me?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 857-871.
24.
GriffinD. W.BartholomewK. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 17–52). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
25.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
26.
HelgesonV. S.NaqviJ. B.Gary-WebbT.KorytkowskiM. (2021). 8). Observed couple interactions among white and black persons with Type 2 diabetes. Journal of Family Psychology, 35, 1117-1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000857.
27.
HicksA. M.DiamondL. M. (2008). How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 205-228.
28.
JohnsonM. D.NeyerF. J.FinnC. (2020). Subjective well-being across partnerships. Journal of Family Psychology. 35(4), 546–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000793
29.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
30.
KiesswetterM.MarsonerH.LuehwinkA.FistarolM.MahlknechtA.DuschekS. (2020). Impairments in life satisfaction in infertility: Associations with perceived stress, affectivity, partnership quality, social support and the desire to have a child. Behavioral Medicine, 46(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2018.1564897
31.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
32.
LaurenceauJ. -P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). Interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A Daily-Diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1238
33.
LeporeS. J.RevensonT. A. (2007). Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00013.x
LozanoE. B.SzeW. Y.FraleyR. C.ChongJ. Y. (2021). Dyadic effects of attachment and relationship functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), 1572–1595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521999443
37.
MikulincerM.GillathO.HalevyV.AvihouN.AvidanS.EshkoliN. (2001). Attachment theory and reactions to others’ needs’: Evidence that activation of the sense of attachment security promotes empathic responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1205-1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1205.
38.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford.
39.
MizrahiM.HirschbergerG.MikulincerM.SzepsenwolO.BirnbaumG. E. (2016). Reassuring sex: Can sexual desire and intimacy reduce relationship-specific attachment insecurities?European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2184
40.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.84.1.126
41.
NijmanS. W. J.GroenhofT. K. J.HooglandJ.BotsM. L.BrandjesM.JacobsJ. J. L.AsselbergsF. W.MoonsK. G. M.DebrayT. P. A. (2021). Real-time imputation of missing predictor values improved the application of prediction models in daily practice. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.003
42.
PasipanodyaE. C.ParrishB. P.LaurenceauJ. -P.CohenL. H.SiegelS. D.GraberE. C.BelcherA. J.2012). Social constraints on disclosure predict daily well-being in couples coping with early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028655
43.
PennebakerJ. W. (1995). Emotion, disclosure & health. American Psychological Association.
44.
PragerK. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. The Guilford Press.
45.
PragerK. J. (2014). The dilemmas of intimacy: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Routledge.
46.
PragerK. J.BuhrmesterD. (1998). Intimacy and need fulfillment in couple relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(4), 435–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598154001
47.
PragerK. J.ShirvaniF.PoucherJ.CavallinG.TruongM.GarciaJ. J. (2015). Recovery from conflict and revival of intimacy in cohabiting couples. Personal Relationships, 22(2), 308–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12082
48.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
49.
ReisH. T.PatrickB. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). Guilford Press.
50.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Wiley.
51.
SchudlichT. D. D.PappL. M.CummingsE. M. (2011). Relations between spouses’ depressive symptoms and marital conflict: A longitudinal investigation of the role of conflict resolution styles. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024216
52.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (2015). Attachment theory and research: New directions and emerging themes. Guilford.
53.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
54.
SprecherS.HendrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
55.
TanR.OverallN. C.TaylorJ. K. (2012). Let’s talk about us: Attachment, relationship-focused disclosure, and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01383.x
56.
TravagliaL. K.OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2009). Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.015
57.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
