In a Lonely Place: Investigating Regional Differences in Loneliness

Abstract

Loneliness has traditionally been studied on the individual level. This study is one of the first to systematically describe and explain differences in loneliness on a fine-grained regional level. Using data from the nationally representative German Socio-Economic Panel Study (N = 17,602), we mapped the regional distribution of loneliness across Germany and examined whether regional differences in loneliness can be explained by both individual and regional characteristics. Perceived neighborhood relation, perceived distance to public parks and sport/leisure facilities as well as objective regional remoteness and population change were positively related to loneliness. Individual-level characteristics, however, appeared to be more important in explaining variance in loneliness. In sum, loneliness varies across geographical regions, and these differences can partly be linked to characteristics of these regions. Our results may aid governments and public health care services to identify geographical areas most at risk of loneliness and the resulting physical and mental health issues.

Keywords

loneliness social isolation geographical psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Airaksinen

Hakulinen

Elovainio

Lehtimäki

Raitakari

O. T.

Keltikangas-Järvinen

Jokela

(2015). Neighborhood effects in depressive symptoms, social support, and mistrust: Longitudinal analysis with repeated measurements. Social Science and Medicine, 136–137, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.034

Bach

R. A.

Defever

A. M.

Chopik

W. J.

Konrath

S. H.

(2017). Geographic variation in empathy: A state-level analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.007

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beer

Faulkner

Law

Lewin

Tinker

Buys

Bentley

Watt

McKechnie

Chessman

(2016). Regional variation in social isolation amongst older Australians. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1144481

Berkman

L. F.

Glass

Brissette

Seeman

T. E.

(2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4

Beutel

M. E.

Klein

E. M.

Brähler

Reiner

Jünger

Michal

Wiltink

Wild

P. S.

Münzel

Lackner

K. L.

Tibubos

A. N.

(2017). Loneliness in the general population: Prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1262-x

Brenner

(2017). Identification of clusters—An actor-based approach (Working Papers on Innovation and Space No. 02.17) . Philipps-Universität Marburg.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Hawkley

L. C.

(2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005

Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands/Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern (CDU/CSU) and Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD). (2018). Ein neuer Aufbruch fuür Europa—Eine neue Dynamik fuür Deutschland—Ein neuer Zusammenhalt fuür unser Land: Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD. 19. Legislaturperiode [A new beginning for Europe—A new dynamic for Germany—A new cohesion for o]. https://www.bundes-tag.de/blob/543200/9f9f21a92a618c77aa330f00ed21e308/kw49_koalition_koalitionsvertrag-data.pdf

10.

Crawford

Timperio

Giles-Corti

Ball

Hume

Roberts

Andrianopoulos

Salmon

(2008). Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? Health and Place, 14(4), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.11.002

11.

Delmelle

E. C.

Haslauer

Prinz

(2013). Social satisfaction, commuting and neighborhoods. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.006

12.

Dovern

Quaas

M. F.

Rickels

(2014). A comprehensive wealth index for cities in Germany. Ecological Indicators, 41, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.009

13.

Ebert

Gebauer

J. E.

Brenner

Bleidorn

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

Rentfrow

P. J.

(2019). Are regional differences in personality and their correlates robust? Applying spatial analysis techniques to examine regional variation in personality across the US and Germany (Working Papers on Innovation and Space No. 2019.05). Philipps University Marburg.

14.

Ebert

Götz

F. M.

Obschonka

Zmigrod

Rentfrow

P. J.

(2019). Regional variation in courage and entrepreneurship: The contrasting role of courage for the emergence and survival of start-ups in the United States. Journal of Personality, 87, 1039–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12454

15.

Goebel

Grabka

M. M.

Liebig

Kroh

Richter

Schröder

Schupp

(2018). The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik/Journal of Economics and Statistics, 239(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0022

16.

Goodman

Adams

Swift

H. J.

(2015). Hidden citizens: How can we identify the most lonely older adults? The Campaign to End Loneliness

17.

Götz

F. M.

Ebert

Rentfrow

P. J.

(2018). Regional cultures and the psychological geography of Switzerland: Person–environment–fit in personality predicts subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00517

18.

Government of the United Kingdom. (2018). PM commits to government-wide drive to tackle loneliness. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-commits-to-government-wide-drive-to-tackle-loneliness

19.

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8

20.

Hawkley

L. C.

Duvoisin

Ackva

Murdoch

J. C.

Luhmann

(2015). Loneliness in older adults in the USA and Germany: Measurement invariance and validation (NORC Working Paper Series No. 2015–002). NORC at the University of Chicago.

21.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

T. B.

Baker

Harris

Stephenson

(2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352

22.

Hughes

Waite

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

(2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574

23.

Jokela

Bleidorn

Lamb

M. E.

Gosling

S. D.

Rentfrow

P. J.

(2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 725–730. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415800112

24.

Kirby

J. B.

Kaneda

(2005). Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 15–31.

25.

Kroll

L. E.

Schumann

Hoebel

Lampert

(2017). Regional health differences—Developing a socioeconomic deprivation index for Germany. Journal of Health Monitoring, 2(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-048

26.

Luhmann

Hawkley

L. C.

(2016). Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 943–959. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117

27.

Luhmann

Murdoch

J. C.

Hawkley

L. C.

(2015). Subjective well-being in context: County- and state-level socioeconomic factors and individual moderators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614548075

28.

Maas

van Dillen

S. M. E.

Verheij

R. A.

Groenewegen

P. P.

(2009). Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health and Place, 15(2), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006

29.

Matthews

Odgers

C. L.

Danese

Fisher

H. L.

Newbury

J. B.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

Arseneault

(2019). Loneliness and neighborhood characteristics: A multi-informant, nationally representative study of young adults. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619836102

30.

Matz

S. C.

Gladstone

J. J.

Stillwell

(2017). In a world of big data, small effects can still matter: A reply to Boyce, Daly, Hounkpatin, and Wood (2017). Psychological Science, 28(4), 547–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617697445

31.

Menec

V. H.

Newall

N. E.

Mackenzie

C. S.

Shooshtari

Nowicki

(2019). Examining individual and geographic factors associated with social isolation and loneliness using Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data. PLoS One, 14(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211143

32.

Nai

Narayanan

Hernandez

Savani

(2018). People in more racially diverse neighborhoods are more prosocial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000103

33.

Oishi

(2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-030413-152156

34.

Pinquart

Sörensen

(2003). Risk factors for loneliness in adulthood and old age: A meta-analysis. In Shohov

S. P.

(Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 19, pp. 111–143). Nova Science Publishers.

35.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Gosling

S. D.

Jokela

Stillwell

Kosinski

Potter

(2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 996–1012.

36.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

J. A.

(2008). Theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x

37.

Rönkä

A. R.

Rautio

Koiranen

Sunnari

Taanila

(2014). Experience of loneliness among adolescent girls and boys: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 study. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.805876

38.

Ross

C. E.

(2000). Walking, exercising, and smoking: Does neighborhood matter? Social Science and Medicine, 51(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00451-7

39.

Scharf

De Jong Gierveld

(2008). Loneliness in urban neighbourhoods: An Anglo-Dutch comparison. European Journal of Ageing, 5(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-008-0080-x

40.

Schöllgen

Huxhold

Tesch-Römer

(2010). Socioeconomic status and health in the second half of life: Findings from the German Ageing Survey. European Journal of Ageing, 7(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0140-x

41.

van den Berg

Kemperman

de Kleijn

Borgers

(2016). Ageing and loneliness: The role of mobility and the built environment. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2015.03.001

42.

Yen

I. H.

Michael

Y. L.

Perdue

(2009). Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(5), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.022

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

5.44 MB