Across three studies, we examine whether system justification enhances psychological well-being among members of both advantaged and disadvantaged groups. In addition, we test the novel hypothesis that perceived individual upward mobility explains this positive effect of system justification. We address these issues by focusing on system justification and life satisfaction among individuals with high and low social class in China, an understudied non-Western society. Findings suggest that system justification positively predicts both high-class and low-class individuals’ life satisfaction, and this result holds for both adults (Study 1, N = 10,196) and adolescents (Study 2, N = 4,037). Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate that system justification has a causal effect on life satisfaction through an increased level of perceived individual upward mobility (Study 3, N = 172). These findings help explain why people, especially those from lower social class, are willing to justify the status quo.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
BronkK. CHillP. L.LapsleyD. K.TalibT. L.FinchH. (2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 500–510. doi:10.1080/17439760903271439
3.
CaricatiL. (2017). Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis: A multilevel modeling approach to the perception of legitimacy in income distribution in 36 nations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 532–540. doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1242472
4.
CichockaA.JostJ. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post-communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 6–29. doi:10.1002/ijop.12011
5.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T. (2017). Movin’on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 267–274. doi:10.1177/1948550616678454
6.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
7.
FriesenJ. P.LaurinK.ShepherdS.GaucherD.KayA. C. (2019). System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 315–339. doi:10.1111/bjso.12278
8.
GodfreyE. B.SantosC. E.BursonE. (2019). For better or worse? System-justifying beliefs in sixth-grade predict trajectories of self-esteem and behavior across early adolescence. Child Development, 90, 180–195. doi:10.1111/cdev.12854
9.
HardingJ. F.SibleyC. G. (2013). The palliative function of system justification: Concurrent benefits versus longer-term costs to wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 113, 401–418. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0101-1
10.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
12.
JostJ. T. (2017). Working class conservatism: A system justification perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 73–78. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.020
13.
JostJ. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263–314. doi:10.1111/bjso.12297
14.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
15.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
16.
JostJ. T.BeckerJ.OsborneD.BadaanV. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108. doi:10.1177/0963721417690633
17.
JostJ. T.BurgessD.MossoC. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JostJ. T.Chaikalis-PetritsisV.AbramsD.SidaniusJ.Van Der ToornJ.BrattC. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197–208. doi:10.1177/0146167211422544
19.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
20.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
21.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.Ni SullivanB. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
22.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
23.
JostJ. T.van der ToornJ. (2012). System justification theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313–343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n42
24.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
25.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004. doi:10.1037/a0016357
26.
KrausM. W.TanJ. J. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.005
27.
LuX. (2017). Jottings under lamplight. In LuX.ChengE. J.KrikA.DentonK. (Eds.). Massachusetts, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1923)
28.
McCoyS. K.WellmanJ. D.CosleyB.SaslowL.EpelE. (2013). Is the belief in meritocracy palliative for members of low status groups? Evidence for a benefit for self-esteem and physical health via perceived control. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 307–318. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1959
29.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?Psychological Science, 19, 565–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x
30.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12. doi:10.1177/1745691610393524
31.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729. doi:10.1177/0146167205278261
OsborneD.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2019). System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 340–361. doi:10.1111/bjso.12302
34.
OwuamalamC. K.RubinM.SpearsR. (2019). Revisiting 25 years of system motivation explanation for system justification from the perspective of social identity model of system attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 362–381. doi:10.1111/bjso.12285
35.
PearlinLSchoolerC. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21. doi:10.2307/2136319
36.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/bf03206553
37.
QuinnD. M.CrockerJ. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402–414. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.402
38.
RankinL. E.JostJ. T.WakslakC. J. (2009). System justification and the meaning of life: Are the existential benefits of ideology distributed unequally across racial groups?Social Justice Research, 22, 312–333. doi:10.1007/s11211-009-0100-9
39.
SagioglouC.ForstmannM.GreitemeyerT. (2019). Belief in social mobility mitigates hostility resulting from disadvantaged social standing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 541–556. doi:10.1177/0146167218789073
40.
SchlenkerB. R.ChambersJ. R.LeB. M. (2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009
41.
SenguptaN. K.GreavesL. M.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2017). The sigh of the oppressed: The palliative effects of ideology are stronger for people living in highly unequal neighbourhoods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 437–454. doi:10.1111/bjso.12192
42.
SuppesA.NapierJ. L.van der ToornJ. (2019). The palliative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 372–388. doi:10.1177/0146167218785
43.
Vargas-SalfateS. (2019). The role of personal control in the palliative function of system justification among indigenous and non-indigenous Peruvian students. Revista de Psicología Social, 34, 168–201. doi:10.1080/02134748.2018.1537650
44.
Vargas-SalfateS.PaezD.KhanS. S.LiuJ. H.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2018). System justification enhances well-being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 567–590. doi:10.1111/bjso.12254
45.
Vargas-SalfateS.PaezD.LiuJ. H.PrattoF.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2018). A comparison of social dominance theory and system justification: The role of social status in 19 nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1060–1076. doi:10.1177/0146167218757455
46.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 11–24. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2275
47.
XieY.ZhouX. (2014). Income inequality in today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 6928–6933. doi:10.1073/pnas.1403158111
48.
YangY.ZhangM.KouY. (2016). Self-compassion and life satisfaction: The mediating role of hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 91–95. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.08
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
